Talk:Tempered monzos and vals - Revision history

Sintel: /* FloraC Why are you so particular about breadcrumbs? */

2025-05-17T17:52:04Z

FloraC Why are you so particular about breadcrumbs?

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:52, 17 May 2025
Line 29:		Line 29:

	Or is there a navigational tool you recommend that can help page backlinks but without implying the weird... "philosophy" that you associate with subpages fsr? -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 17:11, 17 May 2025 (UTC)		Or is there a navigational tool you recommend that can help page backlinks but without implying the weird... "philosophy" that you associate with subpages fsr? -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 17:11, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

			: It's simple, breadcrumbs are for subpages to link back to their main page. A wiki is not hierarchical, so it doesn't make sense on the majority of pages. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 17:52, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

VectorGraphics: /* FloraC Why are you so particular about breadcrumbs? */ new section

2025-05-17T17:11:22Z

FloraC Why are you so particular about breadcrumbs?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:11, 17 May 2025
Line 25:		Line 25:

	::: Alright then. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:51, 23 April 2025 (UTC)		::: Alright then. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:51, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

			== FloraC Why are you so particular about breadcrumbs? ==

			Or is there a navigational tool you recommend that can help page backlinks but without implying the weird... "philosophy" that you associate with subpages fsr? -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 17:11, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

VectorGraphics: VectorGraphics moved page Talk:Tmonzos and tvals to Talk:Tempered monzos and vals

2025-05-16T04:37:35Z

VectorGraphics moved page Talk:Tmonzos and tvals to Talk:Tempered monzos and vals

← Older revision	Revision as of 04:37, 16 May 2025
(No difference)

FloraC: Re

2025-04-23T10:51:18Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:51, 23 April 2025
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:: Anyway, it's kind of besides the point, the definitions should be discussed on a single page instead of being spread out to irrelevant pages.		:: Anyway, it's kind of besides the point, the definitions should be discussed on a single page instead of being spread out to irrelevant pages.
	:: – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 10:38, 23 April 2025 (UTC)		:: – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 10:38, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

			::: Alright then. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:51, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

Sintel at 10:38, 23 April 2025

2025-04-23T10:38:49Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:38, 23 April 2025
Line 19:		Line 19:

	: [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:16, 23 April 2025 (UTC)		: [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:16, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

			:: Kind of a technical point, but the mathematical theory page doesn't say anything about equivalence classes or unimodular transformations. It is kind of implicit though, so maybe we should add that sentence there. Also, it doesn't make clear if we should consider left or right transformations. We generally only consider left transformations. Besides that, there's the question of whether we allow contorsion, which is explicitly not allowed by most definitions.
			:: Anyway, it's kind of besides the point, the definitions should be discussed on a single page instead of being spread out to irrelevant pages.
			:: – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 10:38, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

FloraC: Re

2025-04-23T10:16:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:16, 23 April 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:
	– [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 23:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)		– [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 23:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

			: Agree. Battaglia and co have a habit of making a page titled one thing and then making that page about something completely different. (See the history of the radical interval page for another example. ---[[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 23:57, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

	~~Agree. Battaglia and co have~~ a ~~habit of making~~ a ~~page titled one thing and then making~~ that ~~page about something completely different~~. ~~(See~~ the ~~history~~ of the ~~radical interval page for another example~~. ~~---~~[[User:~~VectorGraphics~~\|~~VectorGraphics~~]] ([[User talk:~~VectorGraphics~~\|talk]]) 23:57, 22 April 2025 (UTC)		: Care to explain in which way this is inconsistent with ''Mathematical theory of regular temperaments''? In that page a temp is defined as

			: > A regular temperament is a homomorphism that maps an abelian group of target/pure intervals to another abelian group of tempered intervals.

			: which seems to say the same thing as the first sentence of what you cited. The second sentence seems to just be saying there's infinitely many eqivalent matrices that represent the same temp.

			: [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:16, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

VectorGraphics at 23:57, 22 April 2025

2025-04-22T23:57:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:57, 22 April 2025
Line 9:		Line 9:

	– [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 23:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)		– [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 23:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)


			Agree. Battaglia and co have a habit of making a page titled one thing and then making that page about something completely different. (See the history of the radical interval page for another example. ---[[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 23:57, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Sintel at 23:34, 22 April 2025

2025-04-22T23:34:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:34, 22 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WSArchiveLink}}		{{WSArchiveLink}}

			== Unnecessary formalization ==

			The formal definitions given here:
			: Mathematically, a regular temperament is a homomorphism (a kind of function) from the space of just intervals to the space of tempered intervals generated by that temperament, where both these spaces are abelian groups. Technically, a regular temperament is an equivalence class of functions separated by unimodular transformations, which represent the same temperament.

			are completely out of place, and furthermore they are inconsistent with definitions given elsewhere (such as on [[Mathematical theory of regular temperaments]], which I would consider "canonical" despite the many problems of that page). I would just remove them entirely since they don't add anything.

			– [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 23:34, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Cmloegcmluin: /* Link back to less-technical article focusing only on "tmonzo" */ thanks for adding the link! (removing section for requesting it)

2023-02-07T16:26:47Z

Link back to less-technical article focusing only on "tmonzo": thanks for adding the link! (removing section for requesting it)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:26, 7 February 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WSArchiveLink}}		{{WSArchiveLink}}

	~~== Link back to less-technical article focusing only on "tmonzo" ==~~

	I recently added the article [[mapped interval]] which addresses only the "tmonzo" part of this article more simply and in more focused detail. I linked from there to here. Could we add a link from this article to the new one, please? I'd do it myself but I don't have edit rights on this locked page. Thanks. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 00:29, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Cmloegcmluin: /* Link back to less-technical article focusing only on "tmonzo" */ new section

2022-12-15T00:29:11Z

Link back to less-technical article focusing only on "tmonzo": new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:29, 15 December 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WSArchiveLink}}		{{WSArchiveLink}}

			== Link back to less-technical article focusing only on "tmonzo" ==

			I recently added the article [[mapped interval]] which addresses only the "tmonzo" part of this article more simply and in more focused detail. I linked from there to here. Could we add a link from this article to the new one, please? I'd do it myself but I don't have edit rights on this locked page. Thanks. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 00:29, 15 December 2022 (UTC)