Talk:Table of 159edo Intervals - Revision history

Xenwolf: /* Formatting */ my POV

2020-11-30T12:30:03Z

Formatting: my POV

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:30, 30 November 2020
Line 22:		Line 22:

	I've changed my mind. The table looks clean now because it's not completely filled. But if you do an exhaustive search as I did in [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Table_of_198edo_intervals&oldid=52608 Table of 198edo intervals], you'll see how messy it is and how a lot of them are unuseful. That's why I decided to remove them and now [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Table_of_198edo_intervals&oldid=53819 this version] looks much better to me. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:19, 30 November 2020 (UTC)		I've changed my mind. The table looks clean now because it's not completely filled. But if you do an exhaustive search as I did in [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Table_of_198edo_intervals&oldid=52608 Table of 198edo intervals], you'll see how messy it is and how a lot of them are unuseful. That's why I decided to remove them and now [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Table_of_198edo_intervals&oldid=53819 this version] looks much better to me. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:19, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

			: Well, in that case my comments in ''[[Talk:Table of 198edo intervals#The " meaning]]'' will also apply here. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:30, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

FloraC: /* Formatting */ new idea

2020-11-30T07:19:24Z

Formatting: new idea

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:19, 30 November 2020
Line 20:		Line 20:

	::: It's good to see that I've gotten a few things right in how I'm doing this chart. It is precisely to convey the structural characteristics of the temperament that I have set certain criteria for the inclusion of intervals in the chart, refusing to use intervals with too great of a margin of error both in absolute and relative terms. (reposted by --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 03:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC))		::: It's good to see that I've gotten a few things right in how I'm doing this chart. It is precisely to convey the structural characteristics of the temperament that I have set certain criteria for the inclusion of intervals in the chart, refusing to use intervals with too great of a margin of error both in absolute and relative terms. (reposted by --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 03:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC))

			I've changed my mind. The table looks clean now because it's not completely filled. But if you do an exhaustive search as I did in [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Table_of_198edo_intervals&oldid=52608 Table of 198edo intervals], you'll see how messy it is and how a lot of them are unuseful. That's why I decided to remove them and now [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Table_of_198edo_intervals&oldid=53819 this version] looks much better to me. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:19, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Aura at 03:34, 17 September 2020

2020-09-17T03:34:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:34, 17 September 2020
Line 19:		Line 19:
	:: Yes. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 12:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)		:: Yes. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 12:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

	::: It's good to see that I've gotten a few things right in how I'm doing this chart. It is precisely to convey the structural characteristics of the temperament that I have set certain criteria for the inclusion of intervals in the chart, refusing to use intervals with too great of a margin of error both in absolute and relative terms. ~~As far as I'm concerned, however, I think my current style for this chart can stay until all the ratios are in, then we can worry about separating the merged cells and stuff like that.~~ --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 13:17~~, 16~~ September 2020 (UTC)		::: It's good to see that I've gotten a few things right in how I'm doing this chart. It is precisely to convey the structural characteristics of the temperament that I have set certain criteria for the inclusion of intervals in the chart, refusing to use intervals with too great of a margin of error both in absolute and relative terms. (reposted by --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 03:34, 17 September 2020 (UTC))

Aura at 13:17, 16 September 2020

2020-09-16T13:17:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:17, 16 September 2020
Line 18:		Line 18:

	:: Yes. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 12:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)		:: Yes. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 12:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

			::: It's good to see that I've gotten a few things right in how I'm doing this chart. It is precisely to convey the structural characteristics of the temperament that I have set certain criteria for the inclusion of intervals in the chart, refusing to use intervals with too great of a margin of error both in absolute and relative terms. As far as I'm concerned, however, I think my current style for this chart can stay until all the ratios are in, then we can worry about separating the merged cells and stuff like that. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 13:17, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

FloraC: re

2020-09-16T12:13:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:13, 16 September 2020
Line 16:		Line 16:

	: If I understand right: you are suggesting the use of regular columns (even if with empty cells)? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 11:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)		: If I understand right: you are suggesting the use of regular columns (even if with empty cells)? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 11:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

			:: Yes. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 12:13, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Xenwolf: /* Formatting */ typos

2020-09-16T11:49:02Z

Formatting: typos

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:49, 16 September 2020
Line 15:		Line 15:
	I think Aura has a good start. We might propagate that. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)		I think Aura has a good start. We might propagate that. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

	: If I understand right~~. You suggest to have~~ regular columns (even if with empty cells)? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 11:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)		: If I understand right: you are suggesting the use of regular columns (even if with empty cells)? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 11:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Xenwolf: /* Formatting */ re

2020-09-16T11:48:17Z

Formatting: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:48, 16 September 2020
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I think Aura has a good start. We might propagate that. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)		I think Aura has a good start. We might propagate that. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

			: If I understand right. You suggest to have regular columns (even if with empty cells)? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 11:48, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

FloraC: Created page with "== Formatting == Tbh I'm not fond of the current format of most such interval table pages. # With a lot of merged columns it looks messy and hard to read. # Some important..."

2020-09-16T07:28:02Z

Created page with "== Formatting == Tbh I'm not fond of the current format of most such interval table pages. # With a lot of merged columns it looks messy and hard to read. # Some important..."

New page

== Formatting ==

Tbh I'm not fond of the current format of most such interval table pages.

# With a lot of merged columns it looks messy and hard to read.
# Some important higher-limit ratios are often obscured by simpler ratios in lower limit. That doesn't help to understand the structural characteristics of the temperament.

I suggest:

# Never merge units even if empty.
# All ratios under a certain criteria (which may vary by the complexity of the edo) should be present, despite the existence of simpler ones.

That'll make the interval table more similar to those in main edo pages, but each prime limit is in separate column, from which larger and higher-limit edos still benefit.

I think Aura has a good start. We might propagate that. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 07:28, 16 September 2020 (UTC)