Talk:Subgroup temperament families, relationships, and genes - Revision history

FloraC: Re

2025-06-28T16:46:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:46, 28 June 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:

	== "Gene" vs step of 311? ==		== "Gene" vs step of 311? ==

	Isn't "gene" already taken as a step of 311edo? P.S. Honestly I'd rather it be removed from 311edo than from here. -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 00:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)		Isn't "gene" already taken as a step of 311edo? P.S. Honestly I'd rather it be removed from 311edo than from here. -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 00:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

	: Yeah I think this is a rare case where the name is appropriate and the concept is novel enough to deserve a name. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 00:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)		: Yeah I think this is a rare case where the name is appropriate and the concept is novel enough to deserve a name. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 00:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
	: Oh and by the way this idea is actually in use in my temperament finder right now, though I ended up just calling them families because gene isn't really a widely recognized term (I think?) – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]])		: Oh and by the way this idea is actually in use in my temperament finder right now, though I ended up just calling them families because gene isn't really a widely recognized term (I think?) – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]])

			:: I don't think these are similar enough types of concepts as to cause conflicts. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 16:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

Sintel at 00:45, 28 June 2025

2025-06-28T00:45:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:45, 28 June 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:

	: Yeah I think this is a rare case where the name is appropriate and the concept is novel enough to deserve a name. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 00:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)		: Yeah I think this is a rare case where the name is appropriate and the concept is novel enough to deserve a name. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 00:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
			: Oh and by the way this idea is actually in use in my temperament finder right now, though I ended up just calling them families because gene isn't really a widely recognized term (I think?) – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]])

Sintel: /* "Gene" vs step of 311? */

2025-06-28T00:43:16Z

"Gene" vs step of 311?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:43, 28 June 2025
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Isn't "gene" already taken as a step of 311edo? P.S. Honestly I'd rather it be removed from 311edo than from here. -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 00:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)		Isn't "gene" already taken as a step of 311edo? P.S. Honestly I'd rather it be removed from 311edo than from here. -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 00:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

			: Yeah I think this is a rare case where the name is appropriate and the concept is novel enough to deserve a name. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 00:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

VectorGraphics: /* "Gene" vs step of 311? */ new section

2025-06-28T00:16:43Z

"Gene" vs step of 311?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:16, 28 June 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:: Oops, cruft from an earlier revision where I was only looking at codimension-1 genes. Edited [[User:Mike Battaglia\|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia\|talk]]) 03:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC)		:: Oops, cruft from an earlier revision where I was only looking at codimension-1 genes. Edited [[User:Mike Battaglia\|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia\|talk]]) 03:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

			== "Gene" vs step of 311? ==

			Isn't "gene" already taken as a step of 311edo? P.S. Honestly I'd rather it be removed from 311edo than from here. -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 00:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

ArrowHead294: ArrowHead294 moved page Talk:Subgroup Temperament Families, Relationships, and Genes to Talk:Subgroup temperament families, relationships, and genes: WP:NCCAPS

2025-02-24T13:59:01Z

ArrowHead294 moved page Talk:Subgroup Temperament Families, Relationships, and Genes to Talk:Subgroup temperament families, relationships, and genes: WP:NCCAPS

← Older revision	Revision as of 13:59, 24 February 2025
(No difference)

Mike Battaglia: /* Confusion about rank of a gene */

2021-05-10T03:52:11Z

Confusion about rank of a gene

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:52, 10 May 2021
Line 6:		Line 6:

	: Because it tempers out one comma? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:10, 9 May 2021 (UTC)		: Because it tempers out one comma? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:10, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

			:: Oops, cruft from an earlier revision where I was only looking at codimension-1 genes. Edited [[User:Mike Battaglia\|Mike Battaglia]] ([[User talk:Mike Battaglia\|talk]]) 03:52, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

FloraC: /* Confusion about rank of a gene */ re

2021-05-09T07:10:14Z

Confusion about rank of a gene: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:10, 9 May 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:
	"The dimension or rank of a gene is simply its rank as a temperament (which is one less than the rank of the subgroup is being tempered from)"		"The dimension or rank of a gene is simply its rank as a temperament (which is one less than the rank of the subgroup is being tempered from)"

	:I don't understand the part in parentheses here. Why is it one less? —[[User:Keenan Pepper\|Keenan Pepper]] ([[User talk:Keenan Pepper\|talk]]) 21:14, 8 May 2021 (UTC)		I don't understand the part in parentheses here. Why is it one less? —[[User:Keenan Pepper\|Keenan Pepper]] ([[User talk:Keenan Pepper\|talk]]) 21:14, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

			: Because it tempers out one comma? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:10, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Keenan Pepper: /* Confusion about rank of a gene */ new section

2021-05-08T21:14:48Z

Confusion about rank of a gene: new section

New page

== Confusion about rank of a gene ==

"The dimension or rank of a gene is simply its rank as a temperament (which is one less than the rank of the subgroup is being tempered from)"

:I don't understand the part in parentheses here. Why is it one less? —[[User:Keenan Pepper|Keenan Pepper]] ([[User talk:Keenan Pepper|talk]]) 21:14, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:46, 28 June 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:

	== "Gene" vs step of 311? ==		== "Gene" vs step of 311? ==

	Isn't "gene" already taken as a step of 311edo? P.S. Honestly I'd rather it be removed from 311edo than from here. -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 00:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)		Isn't "gene" already taken as a step of 311edo? P.S. Honestly I'd rather it be removed from 311edo than from here. -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 00:16, 28 June 2025 (UTC)

	: Yeah I think this is a rare case where the name is appropriate and the concept is novel enough to deserve a name. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 00:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)		: Yeah I think this is a rare case where the name is appropriate and the concept is novel enough to deserve a name. – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 00:43, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
	: Oh and by the way this idea is actually in use in my temperament finder right now, though I ended up just calling them families because gene isn't really a widely recognized term (I think?) – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]])		: Oh and by the way this idea is actually in use in my temperament finder right now, though I ended up just calling them families because gene isn't really a widely recognized term (I think?) – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]])

			:: I don't think these are similar enough types of concepts as to cause conflicts. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 16:46, 28 June 2025 (UTC)