Talk:Starling temperaments - Revision history

Xenwolf: /* Check EDO lists */ new section

2020-10-25T17:41:46Z

Check EDO lists: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:41, 25 October 2020
Line 12:		Line 12:

	I'm extending this temperament to 13-limit cuz there's an obvious mapping for 13. For 11, there's 27p & 77 or 27e & 77. It can be shown 27e & 77 is lowest in badness so I'm going for that. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 06:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)		I'm extending this temperament to 13-limit cuz there's an obvious mapping for 13. For 11, there's 27p & 77 or 27e & 77. It can be shown 27e & 77 is lowest in badness so I'm going for that. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 06:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

			== Check EDO lists ==

			FloraC, can you give a short HowTo for checking these lists? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 17:41, 25 October 2020 (UTC)

FloraC at 06:46, 19 August 2020

2020-08-19T06:46:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:46, 19 August 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:

	:: I added the badness (thru my own code). [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)		:: I added the badness (thru my own code). [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

			I'm extending this temperament to 13-limit cuz there's an obvious mapping for 13. For 11, there's 27p & 77 or 27e & 77. It can be shown 27e & 77 is lowest in badness so I'm going for that. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 06:46, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

FloraC at 11:47, 6 August 2020

2020-08-06T11:47:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:47, 6 August 2020
Line 8:		Line 8:

	:Added 7-limit Oolong. (everything except badness) [[User:IlL\|IlL]] ([[User talk:IlL\|talk]]) 07:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC)		:Added 7-limit Oolong. (everything except badness) [[User:IlL\|IlL]] ([[User talk:IlL\|talk]]) 07:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

			:: I added the badness (thru my own code). [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:47, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Inthar: /* Undocumented temperament */

2020-08-06T07:10:54Z

Undocumented temperament

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:10, 6 August 2020
Line 6:		Line 6:

	It has a name but not documented here. Maybe we add it? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 06:56, 6 August 2020 (UTC)		It has a name but not documented here. Maybe we add it? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 06:56, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

			:Added 7-limit Oolong. (everything except badness) [[User:IlL\|IlL]] ([[User talk:IlL\|talk]]) 07:10, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

FloraC: /* Undocumented temperament */ new section

2020-08-06T06:56:23Z

Undocumented temperament: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:56, 6 August 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WSArchiveLink}}		{{WSArchiveLink}}

			== Undocumented temperament ==

			I was wandering around the temperament finder and found this: http://x31eq.com/cgi-bin/rt.cgi?ets=27+%26+50&limit=7

			It has a name but not documented here. Maybe we add it? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 06:56, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Mike Battaglia: 1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage

2018-10-01T18:02:43Z

1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:02, 1 October 2018
(No difference)

Wikispaces>FREEZE at 18:01, 1 October 2018

2018-10-01T18:01:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 1 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =~~		{{WSArchiveLink}}
	~~'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''~~
	~~----~~

	~~== POTE generator ==~~
	~~I am looking for an understandable explanation of POTE generator, the linked POTE tuning (and also Tenney-Euclidean Tuning) doesn't help very much.~~

	~~...maybe I'm not patient enough or too poor in English, but I cannot find a description in the text. Please help!~~

	~~- '''xenwolf''' August 26, 2011, 12:37:45 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~Would it help if I described how to find the POTE tuning in a way which did not attempt to discuss any theory?~~

	~~- '''genewardsmith''' August 27, 2011, 09:57:52 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	Yes, a practical help to get done a particulare POTE tuning. Nothing against the theory (and links to theoretical topics will be good), but the way to percept a theory is better, when it starts at the problem. Try first to ask: What is the problem that is solved by this technique (an why is it a problem at all). I think if the problem is not well understood, then the solution either.

	~~- '''xenwolf''' August 29, 2011, 12:09:17 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~See what you think now.~~

	~~- '''genewardsmith''' August 29, 2011, 04:23:54 PM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~

	~~== Temperament Names? ==~~
	~~Does anyone have any idea why the temperaments have such cool names? Why are there no examples of songs or even samples of the temperament?~~

	~~- '''Cenobyte''' August 25, 2011, 09:50:58 PM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~Some time back in the last millenium Herman Miller came up with a scale he called "starling", analysis of which indicated it was based on tempering out 126/125.~~

	~~- '''genewardsmith''' August 25, 2011, 11:26:39 PM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~Did he know what he was making, or did he just to it intuitively?~~

	~~- '''Cenobyte''' August 27, 2011, 11:30:12 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~

Wikispaces>FREEZE at 00:00, 17 July 2018

2018-07-17T00:00:00Z

New page

= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
----

== POTE generator ==
I am looking for an understandable explanation of POTE generator, the linked POTE tuning (and also Tenney-Euclidean Tuning) doesn't help very much.

...maybe I'm not patient enough or too poor in English, but I cannot find a description in the text. Please help!

- '''xenwolf''' August 26, 2011, 12:37:45 AM UTC-0700
----
Would it help if I described how to find the POTE tuning in a way which did not attempt to discuss any theory?

- '''genewardsmith''' August 27, 2011, 09:57:52 AM UTC-0700
----
Yes, a practical help to get done a particulare POTE tuning. Nothing against the theory (and links to theoretical topics will be good), but the way to percept a theory is better, when it starts at the problem. Try first to ask: What is the problem that is solved by this technique (an why is it a problem at all). I think if the problem is not well understood, then the solution either.

- '''xenwolf''' August 29, 2011, 12:09:17 AM UTC-0700
----
See what you think now.

- '''genewardsmith''' August 29, 2011, 04:23:54 PM UTC-0700
----

== Temperament Names? ==
Does anyone have any idea why the temperaments have such cool names? Why are there no examples of songs or even samples of the temperament?

- '''Cenobyte''' August 25, 2011, 09:50:58 PM UTC-0700
----
Some time back in the last millenium Herman Miller came up with a scale he called "starling", analysis of which indicated it was based on tempering out 126/125.

- '''genewardsmith''' August 25, 2011, 11:26:39 PM UTC-0700
----
Did he know what he was making, or did he just to it intuitively?

- '''Cenobyte''' August 27, 2011, 11:30:12 AM UTC-0700
----