Talk:Small comma - Revision history

TallKite at 05:42, 18 December 2023

2023-12-18T05:42:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:42, 18 December 2023
Line 72:		Line 72:

	So I suggest the name Yo-28 be moved to the first column, next to "oquatonic comma", and the 2nd column have the usual color name, Quadla-sepquadyo. Likewise for Gu-31 and Gu-59. -[[User:TallKite\|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite\|talk]]) 00:46, 11 March 2023 (UTC)		So I suggest the name Yo-28 be moved to the first column, next to "oquatonic comma", and the 2nd column have the usual color name, Quadla-sepquadyo. Likewise for Gu-31 and Gu-59. -[[User:TallKite\|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite\|talk]]) 00:46, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

			== Color names for 3-limit commas ==
			Color names are mostly a straightforward mapping of the numbers in the monzo to syllables, except that it obscures the 2-count and 3-count. You have to deduce those from the degree, the magnitude, etc. Mostly this works quite well. The degree lets you estimate the size in cents, which is usually more useful information than the number of threes in the ratio.

			But it doesn't work well with 3-limit commas. The most important fact about such commas is the 3-count! That tells you which edo it implies, which immediately tells you what you get when you temper out the comma. That's why I devised the "wa format", such as Wa-41, or its short form, w-41.

			But here and on the other two comma pages, the short forms have been changed from e.g. "w-41" to "s<sup>6</sup>w5". IMO this isn't a good idea.

			One could argue that it's somewhat useful to know that this comma turns out to be a very small 5th. IMO that information belongs on the page dedicated to that comma, where there's room to delve into such details. It doesn't belong in the table of commas.

			Also, I don't like seeing the short form removed. It's good to know. It's very useful for equations such as Ly-2 + w-17 = sy2.
			--[[User:TallKite\|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite\|talk]]) 05:42, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

TallKite at 00:47, 11 March 2023

2023-03-11T00:47:15Z

@@ Line 37: / Line 37: @@
 [[User:PiotrGrochowski|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski|talk]]) 11:54, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 == Links in general ==
@@ Line 72: / Line 63: @@
 Update: Nevermind "countriton". It seems it's formed by co + untriton. [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 09:56, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

TallKite: Response to user Gud2228

2023-03-11T00:46:01Z

Response to user Gud2228

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:46, 11 March 2023
Line 37:		Line 37:

	[[User:PiotrGrochowski\|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski\|talk]]) 11:54, 18 September 2018 (UTC)		[[User:PiotrGrochowski\|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski\|talk]]) 11:54, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

			== A new way to name commas in color notation? ==
			User Gud2228 recently added Yo-28, Gu-31 and Gu-59 to this page. These are generalizations of the Wa-N format for 3-limit commas. The format is obviously Yo-N = [x, 0, N> and Gu-N = [x, 0, -N>. It can be generalized to other primes, with e.g. Tho-10 meaning [-37 0 0 0 0 10> (Laquinbitho 2nd, about 5¢).

			I have mixed feelings about this usage. One the one hand, it's great to see people experimenting and improvising with color notation. That's what happens with actual languages after all. And it is a logical extension of existing usage. But still I'd rather not elevate this usage to an official status. IMO it doesn't add enough utility to justify increasing the complexity of the notation.

			So if Yo-28 isn't worth doing, why is a 3-limit name like Wa-29 OK? Because the alternative to Wa-29 is Quadsawa, which obscures the number 29. But Yo-28's alternative is Quadla-sepquadyo, in which "sepquad" clearly indicates the number 28.

			So I suggest the name Yo-28 be moved to the first column, next to "oquatonic comma", and the 2nd column have the usual color name, Quadla-sepquadyo. Likewise for Gu-31 and Gu-59. -[[User:TallKite\|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite\|talk]]) 00:46, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

	== Links in general ==		== Links in general ==

FloraC: /* Proposal to change a few comma names */ update

2022-11-30T09:56:52Z

Proposal to change a few comma names: update

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:56, 30 November 2022
Line 56:		Line 56:
	== Proposal to change a few comma names ==		== Proposal to change a few comma names ==

	* Countriton → countertriton or cotriton		* <s>Countriton → countertriton or cotriton</s>
	: "Countriton" sounds like a result of haplology. I, for one, strongly prefer full prefixes. Either countertriton or cotriton would work.		: <s>"Countriton" sounds like a result of haplology. I, for one, strongly prefer full prefixes. Either countertriton or cotriton would work. </s>
	* Moctdel → motel		* Moctdel → motel
	: "Moctdel" is hard to pronounce. I kinda get that "del" part comes from the grendel temperament (→ Mirkwai clan #Grendel) but I don't see how it's related to moct (millioctave) by any means.		: "Moctdel" is hard to pronounce. I kinda get that "del" part comes from the grendel temperament (→ Mirkwai clan #Grendel) but I don't see how it's related to moct (millioctave) by any means.
	Ideas? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 14:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)		Ideas? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 14:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

			Update: Nevermind "countriton". It seems it's formed by co + untriton. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 09:56, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

FloraC: /* Proposal to change a few comma names */ addition

2022-09-02T14:15:53Z

Proposal to change a few comma names: addition

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:15, 2 September 2022
Line 59:		Line 59:
	: "Countriton" sounds like a result of haplology. I, for one, strongly prefer full prefixes. Either countertriton or cotriton would work.		: "Countriton" sounds like a result of haplology. I, for one, strongly prefer full prefixes. Either countertriton or cotriton would work.
	* Moctdel → motel		* Moctdel → motel
	: "Moctdel" is hard to pronounce ~~and doesn~~'t ~~have a meaning~~.		: "Moctdel" is hard to pronounce. I kinda get that "del" part comes from the grendel temperament (→ Mirkwai clan #Grendel) but I don't see how it's related to moct (millioctave) by any means.
	Ideas? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 14:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)		Ideas? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 14:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

FloraC: /* Proposal to change a few comma names */ new section

2022-09-02T14:10:18Z

Proposal to change a few comma names: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:10, 2 September 2022
Line 53:		Line 53:

	:::::: Okay, then we'll just let it go. Maybe we or someone else will come up with a really good solution for it later. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)		:::::: Okay, then we'll just let it go. Maybe we or someone else will come up with a really good solution for it later. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

			== Proposal to change a few comma names ==

			* Countriton → countertriton or cotriton
			: "Countriton" sounds like a result of haplology. I, for one, strongly prefer full prefixes. Either countertriton or cotriton would work.
			* Moctdel → motel
			: "Moctdel" is hard to pronounce and doesn't have a meaning.
			Ideas? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 14:10, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Xenwolf: /* Links in general */ okay

2020-11-28T12:56:40Z

Links in general: okay

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:56, 28 November 2020
Line 51:		Line 51:

	::::: A further-reading column for links sounds rather forced. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:16, 28 November 2020 (UTC)		::::: A further-reading column for links sounds rather forced. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:16, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

			:::::: Okay, then we'll just let it go. Maybe we or someone else will come up with a really good solution for it later. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:56, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

FloraC: /* Links in general */ re

2020-11-28T08:16:29Z

Links in general: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:16, 28 November 2020
Line 49:		Line 49:

	:::: Would it be too confusing if we link to the existing lemma (in changing columns)? Or should we add a "further reading" column which would help us to place links (like ''[[Garischismic temperaments\|satin comma]]'') that are only loosely coupled with the comma itself? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 19:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)		:::: Would it be too confusing if we link to the existing lemma (in changing columns)? Or should we add a "further reading" column which would help us to place links (like ''[[Garischismic temperaments\|satin comma]]'') that are only loosely coupled with the comma itself? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 19:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

			::::: A further-reading column for links sounds rather forced. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:16, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Xenwolf: /* Links in general */ re

2020-11-27T19:41:46Z

Links in general: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:41, 27 November 2020
Line 47:		Line 47:

	::: Yes, it's an issue for commas with non-unique names. Shall we stick to a ''simple link priciple'', where we always link directly to the page in these tables? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 19:27, 27 November 2020 (UTC)		::: Yes, it's an issue for commas with non-unique names. Shall we stick to a ''simple link priciple'', where we always link directly to the page in these tables? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 19:27, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

			:::: Would it be too confusing if we link to the existing lemma (in changing columns)? Or should we add a "further reading" column which would help us to place links (like ''[[Garischismic temperaments\|satin comma]]'') that are only loosely coupled with the comma itself? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 19:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

FloraC: /* Links in general */ re

2020-11-27T19:27:42Z

Links in general: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 27 November 2020
Line 45:		Line 45:

	:: I think names and ratios of these three commas will be obscure to most people, so there will be no best option. This probably applies to commas in general (except [[81/80]]=syntonic or meantone comma and [[pythagorean comma]] whose ratio I can remember even worse than my phone number). BTW: in cases like [[7/5]] and [[10/7]], who knows (without cheating!) which of them is Euler's and which Huygens' tritone? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 15:58, 27 November 2020 (UTC)		:: I think names and ratios of these three commas will be obscure to most people, so there will be no best option. This probably applies to commas in general (except [[81/80]]=syntonic or meantone comma and [[pythagorean comma]] whose ratio I can remember even worse than my phone number). BTW: in cases like [[7/5]] and [[10/7]], who knows (without cheating!) which of them is Euler's and which Huygens' tritone? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 15:58, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

			::: Yes, it's an issue for commas with non-unique names. Shall we stick to a ''simple link priciple'', where we always link directly to the page in these tables? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 19:27, 27 November 2020 (UTC)