Talk:Sensi - Revision history

FloraC: /* Sensi vs. sensamagic */ re

2025-10-09T10:26:35Z

Sensi vs. sensamagic: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:26, 9 October 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:

	== Sensi vs. sensamagic ==		== Sensi vs. sensamagic ==

	According to Leriendil, there ARE people who call sensamagic/sentry "sensi", just in reference to the basic structure of (9/7)^2 = (5/3). I was definitely confused about that before recently, so I feel it's fair to include a disclaimer.		According to Leriendil, there ARE people who call sensamagic/sentry "sensi", just in reference to the basic structure of (9/7)^2 = (5/3). I was definitely confused about that before recently, so I feel it's fair to include a disclaimer.

Line 16:		Line 15:

	: Yeah, I just don't think an ''article header'' is warranted for that, cuz that's for people who might potentially open say an obsolete link to something that leads to the wrong place, or one of a couple things with the same name. There's little risk of the sort of confusion warranting an article header in this case. --[[User:Lériendil\|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil\|talk]]) 23:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)		: Yeah, I just don't think an ''article header'' is warranted for that, cuz that's for people who might potentially open say an obsolete link to something that leads to the wrong place, or one of a couple things with the same name. There's little risk of the sort of confusion warranting an article header in this case. --[[User:Lériendil\|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil\|talk]]) 23:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

			: Sentry is a strong restriction of sensi so it's a fair use of the term. As for sensamagic, I don't think there is any confusion, and even if there is, it's an easy enough distinction that doesn't warrant a notice on the wiki. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:26, 9 October 2025 (UTC)

Lériendil at 23:16, 8 October 2025

2025-10-08T23:16:25Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:16, 8 October 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:

	-- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 19:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)		-- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 19:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

			: Yeah, I just don't think an ''article header'' is warranted for that, cuz that's for people who might potentially open say an obsolete link to something that leads to the wrong place, or one of a couple things with the same name. There's little risk of the sort of confusion warranting an article header in this case. --[[User:Lériendil\|Lériendil]] ([[User talk:Lériendil\|talk]]) 23:16, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

VectorGraphics: /* Sensi vs. sensamagic */ new section

2025-10-08T19:11:58Z

Sensi vs. sensamagic: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:11, 8 October 2025
Line 8:		Line 8:

	Just some slightly-sleep deprived brain vomit of mine, take of it what you will. [[User:Kaiveran\|Kaiveran]] ([[User talk:Kaiveran\|talk]]) 13:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)		Just some slightly-sleep deprived brain vomit of mine, take of it what you will. [[User:Kaiveran\|Kaiveran]] ([[User talk:Kaiveran\|talk]]) 13:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)

			== Sensi vs. sensamagic ==

			According to Leriendil, there ARE people who call sensamagic/sentry "sensi", just in reference to the basic structure of (9/7)^2 = (5/3). I was definitely confused about that before recently, so I feel it's fair to include a disclaimer.

			-- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 19:11, 8 October 2025 (UTC)

Kaiveran at 05:18, 6 January 2019

2019-01-06T05:18:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:18, 6 January 2019
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Hey Dustin! ==		== Hey Dustin! ==

	Using this nifty tool called FretFind2D, I outlined a version of your proposed Sensi[19] guitar according to my own multiscale design ~~program~~ of sorts. Check it out [http://www.ekips.org/tools/guitar/fretfind2d/#len=25&lenF=25&lenL=27&pDist=0.296&ipDist=0.5&nutWidth=1.8&bridgeWidth=2.7&oE=0.09375&oN=0.1&oB=0.15&oL=0.09375&oF=0.09375&oNL=0.09375&oNF=0.09375&oBL=0.09375&oBF=0.09375&root=12&scl=%0A!+12tet.scl%0A!%0ASensi%2C+tuned+in+46led(2%2F1)%0A19%0A!%0A78.26087%0A130.43478%0A208.69565%0A260.86957%0A339.13043%0A391.30435%0A443.47826%0A521.73913%0A573.91304%0A652.17391%0A704.34783%0A782.60870%0A834.78261%0A886.95652%0A965.21739%0A1017.39130%0A1095.65217%0A1147.82609%0A2%2F1%0A&numFrets=38&numStrings=7&t%5B%5D=4&t%5B%5D=16&t%5B%5D=9&t%5B%5D=21&t%5B%5D=14&t%5B%5D=7&t%5B%5D=0&il%5B%5D=25&il%5B%5D=25.5&il%5B%5D=26&il%5B%5D=26.5&il%5B%5D=27&il%5B%5D=27.5&il%5B%5D=28&u=in&sl=multiple&scale=scala&o=nutbridge here].		Using this nifty tool called FretFind2D, I outlined a version of your proposed Sensi[19] guitar according to my own multiscale design language of sorts. Check it out [http://www.ekips.org/tools/guitar/fretfind2d/#len=25&lenF=25&lenL=27&pDist=0.296&ipDist=0.5&nutWidth=1.8&bridgeWidth=2.7&oE=0.09375&oN=0.1&oB=0.15&oL=0.09375&oF=0.09375&oNL=0.09375&oNF=0.09375&oBL=0.09375&oBF=0.09375&root=12&scl=%0A!+12tet.scl%0A!%0ASensi%2C+tuned+in+46led(2%2F1)%0A19%0A!%0A78.26087%0A130.43478%0A208.69565%0A260.86957%0A339.13043%0A391.30435%0A443.47826%0A521.73913%0A573.91304%0A652.17391%0A704.34783%0A782.60870%0A834.78261%0A886.95652%0A965.21739%0A1017.39130%0A1095.65217%0A1147.82609%0A2%2F1%0A&numFrets=38&numStrings=7&t%5B%5D=4&t%5B%5D=16&t%5B%5D=9&t%5B%5D=21&t%5B%5D=14&t%5B%5D=7&t%5B%5D=0&il%5B%5D=25&il%5B%5D=25.5&il%5B%5D=26&il%5B%5D=26.5&il%5B%5D=27&il%5B%5D=27.5&il%5B%5D=28&u=in&sl=multiple&scale=scala&o=nutbridge here].

	Since the reach of the guitar is a 7/6 higher than normal, and most available strings don't take too kindly to being tuned ''up'', an expedient solution would be to keep the top note around a 12edo/A440 "E" and go ''down'' from there, making the bottom string a kinda sharp C#/Db. The extended 27" scale on the low end would help keep such a note singing nice and clear, while the shorter 25" scale would keep the higher strings warm sounding and easy to handle.		Since the reach of the guitar is a 7/6 higher than normal, and most available strings don't take too kindly to being tuned ''up'', an expedient solution would be to keep the top note around a 12edo/A440 "E" and go ''down'' from there, making the bottom string a kinda sharp C#/Db. The extended 27" scale on the low end would help keep such a note singing nice and clear, while the shorter 25" scale would keep the higher strings warm sounding and easy to handle.

Kaiveran: Created page with "== Hey Dustin! == Using this nifty tool called FretFind2D, I outlined a version of your proposed Sensi[19] guitar according to my own multiscale design program of sorts. Chec..."

2018-12-29T13:32:34Z

Created page with "== Hey Dustin! == Using this nifty tool called FretFind2D, I outlined a version of your proposed Sensi[19] guitar according to my own multiscale design program of sorts. Chec..."

New page

== Hey Dustin! ==

Using this nifty tool called FretFind2D, I outlined a version of your proposed Sensi[19] guitar according to my own multiscale design program of sorts. Check it out [http://www.ekips.org/tools/guitar/fretfind2d/#len=25&lenF=25&lenL=27&pDist=0.296&ipDist=0.5&nutWidth=1.8&bridgeWidth=2.7&oE=0.09375&oN=0.1&oB=0.15&oL=0.09375&oF=0.09375&oNL=0.09375&oNF=0.09375&oBL=0.09375&oBF=0.09375&root=12&scl=%0A!+12tet.scl%0A!%0ASensi%2C+tuned+in+46led(2%2F1)%0A19%0A!%0A78.26087%0A130.43478%0A208.69565%0A260.86957%0A339.13043%0A391.30435%0A443.47826%0A521.73913%0A573.91304%0A652.17391%0A704.34783%0A782.60870%0A834.78261%0A886.95652%0A965.21739%0A1017.39130%0A1095.65217%0A1147.82609%0A2%2F1%0A&numFrets=38&numStrings=7&t%5B%5D=4&t%5B%5D=16&t%5B%5D=9&t%5B%5D=21&t%5B%5D=14&t%5B%5D=7&t%5B%5D=0&il%5B%5D=25&il%5B%5D=25.5&il%5B%5D=26&il%5B%5D=26.5&il%5B%5D=27&il%5B%5D=27.5&il%5B%5D=28&u=in&sl=multiple&scale=scala&o=nutbridge here].

Since the reach of the guitar is a 7/6 higher than normal, and most available strings don't take too kindly to being tuned ''up'', an expedient solution would be to keep the top note around a 12edo/A440 "E" and go ''down'' from there, making the bottom string a kinda sharp C#/Db. The extended 27" scale on the low end would help keep such a note singing nice and clear, while the shorter 25" scale would keep the higher strings warm sounding and easy to handle.

Looking at the fretboard, it would be really nice to connect the "breaks" in the fret positions with curved frets that hit both distances, similar to [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I6PtMIxLzhQ True Temperament] frets, so that you can bend to your heart's content.

Just some slightly-sleep deprived brain vomit of mine, take of it what you will. [[User:Kaiveran|Kaiveran]] ([[User talk:Kaiveran|talk]]) 13:32, 29 December 2018 (UTC)