Talk:Schismatic family - Revision history

FloraC at 10:26, 8 July 2026

2026-07-08T10:26:11Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:26, 8 July 2026
Line 27:		Line 27:

	: I don't see a point for either 2.3.5.11.13 or 2.3.5.13. They are but restrictions of cassandra and they don't get much more accurate than cassandra by removing the 7. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:44, 23 January 2026 (UTC)		: I don't see a point for either 2.3.5.11.13 or 2.3.5.13. They are but restrictions of cassandra and they don't get much more accurate than cassandra by removing the 7. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:44, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

			== Extensions ==
			; Grackle
			: 77 & 89 and 89 & 101e are possible alternative 13-limit extensions. I think grackle may be presented as no-13. Alternatively, since I don't see the point of grack (12 & 65), I think we can delete it and re-use the name for one of the extensions above.

			; Quintaschis
			: This temp has three alternating 11-limit extensions: 277d & 289, 289 & 301, and 301 & 313, with 289 & 301 being the central segment. As such, the 11-limit extension (277d & 289) should not be canon.
			: For the alternative 11-limit extension, quintahelenic (301 & 313), the 13-limit extension should not be canon, as it's the other extension that is supported by the higher equal temps – but of course that one is very complex. So, I think it's best to present this extension as no-13.

			—[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:26, 8 July 2026 (UTC)

FloraC at 10:44, 23 January 2026

2026-01-23T10:44:55Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:44, 23 January 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== Move to "Schismic family" ==		== Move to "Schismic family" ==

	-ismatic is non-standard for temperaments -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 07:18, 19 June 2025 (UTC)		-ismatic is non-standard for temperaments -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 07:18, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Line 14:		Line 13:
	:::: AFAIK neither is more correct than the other. E.g. ''Systematic'' & ''systemic'' both exist. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 13:22, 20 June 2025 (UTC)		:::: AFAIK neither is more correct than the other. E.g. ''Systematic'' & ''systemic'' both exist. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 13:22, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

	==~~about Maqamschismic~~==		:::: I'm in favor of the move btw. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:44, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

			== About maqamschismic ==
	assuming that this temperament(Maqamschismic) is meant to explain how to tune Arabic Maqam, and according to the work of Erv Wilson of analysing Jins Rast and Bayati and [http://www.alsiadi.com/Maqam_rast.html]this website, a ''neutral third'' in the Jins Rast might be 27/22 and tuned a comma lower than 5/4, gives us this temperament within 2.3.5.11 subgroup. i didn't know the point of omitting 7 in this temperament, i cannot prove it but it's obvious that Jins Hijaz finds 16/15~15/14 as a augmented unison, and 7/6 as a doubly diminished fourth. Combining both gives us the tempering property exactly identical as Cassandra. And i didn't know the point of 2.3.5.11.13 Maqamschimic too. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 13:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)		assuming that this temperament(Maqamschismic) is meant to explain how to tune Arabic Maqam, and according to the work of Erv Wilson of analysing Jins Rast and Bayati and [http://www.alsiadi.com/Maqam_rast.html]this website, a ''neutral third'' in the Jins Rast might be 27/22 and tuned a comma lower than 5/4, gives us this temperament within 2.3.5.11 subgroup. i didn't know the point of omitting 7 in this temperament, i cannot prove it but it's obvious that Jins Hijaz finds 16/15~15/14 as a augmented unison, and 7/6 as a doubly diminished fourth. Combining both gives us the tempering property exactly identical as Cassandra. And i didn't know the point of 2.3.5.11.13 Maqamschimic too. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 13:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

	ok so the point is tempering 352/351 in somewhere like Jins Rast will give us ''more aesthetically and theoretically correct'' tuning, and I'm agree with that. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 16:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)		ok so the point is tempering 352/351 in somewhere like Jins Rast will give us ''more aesthetically and theoretically correct'' tuning, and I'm agree with that. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 16:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

	:I chose the name "maqamschismic" because it is based on a chain of fifths, is supported by edos approved by maqam theorists, because it is schismic, and because I like the name. I named it a 2.3.5.13 subgroup because the schismic chain of fifths can be very easily be extended to the 2.3.5.13, so well in fact that Pythagorean tuning can be used. It is where 53edo truly shines. --[[User:Eufalesio\|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio\|talk]]) 18:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)		: I chose the name "maqamschismic" because it is based on a chain of fifths, is supported by edos approved by maqam theorists, because it is schismic, and because I like the name. I named it a 2.3.5.13 subgroup because the schismic chain of fifths can be very easily be extended to the 2.3.5.13, so well in fact that Pythagorean tuning can be used. It is where 53edo truly shines. --[[User:Eufalesio\|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio\|talk]]) 18:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

	:: Nevermind, I reserved ''maqamschismic'' for the 2.3.5.11.13 subgroup. ''Tridecaschismic'' it is! Either way, maqamschismic is not the best schismic tuning for maqāmāt, but it is the simplest. And for that, I think it deserves a spot.		:: Nevermind, I reserved ''maqamschismic'' for the 2.3.5.11.13 subgroup. ''Tridecaschismic'' it is! Either way, maqamschismic is not the best schismic tuning for maqāmāt, but it is the simplest. And for that, I think it deserves a spot.

	::: i actually found an extremely similar temperament before the conversation, only difference is i set 11/8 as a free generator, and it found 7 similar to garibaldi at 7-limit. then i noticed tempering out 352/351 tend to get a slightly larger fifth, and that's ''not so compatible'' with the fifth of schismatic close to just. so i gave up. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 02:39, 23 January 2026 (UTC)		::: i actually found an extremely similar temperament before the conversation, only difference is i set 11/8 as a free generator, and it found 7 similar to garibaldi at 7-limit. then i noticed tempering out 352/351 tend to get a slightly larger fifth, and that's ''not so compatible'' with the fifth of schismatic close to just. so i gave up. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 02:39, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

			: I don't see a point for either 2.3.5.11.13 or 2.3.5.13. They are but restrictions of cassandra and they don't get much more accurate than cassandra by removing the 7. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:44, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

FilterNashi at 02:57, 23 January 2026

2026-01-23T02:57:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:57, 23 January 2026
Line 23:		Line 23:
	:: Nevermind, I reserved ''maqamschismic'' for the 2.3.5.11.13 subgroup. ''Tridecaschismic'' it is! Either way, maqamschismic is not the best schismic tuning for maqāmāt, but it is the simplest. And for that, I think it deserves a spot.		:: Nevermind, I reserved ''maqamschismic'' for the 2.3.5.11.13 subgroup. ''Tridecaschismic'' it is! Either way, maqamschismic is not the best schismic tuning for maqāmāt, but it is the simplest. And for that, I think it deserves a spot.

	:: i actually found an extremely similar temperament, only difference is i set 11/8 as a free generator, and it found 7 similar to garibaldi at 7-limit. then i noticed tempering out 352/351 tend to get a slightly larger fifth, and that's ''not so compatible'' with the fifth of schismatic close to just. so i gave up. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 02:39, 23 January 2026 (UTC)		::: i actually found an extremely similar temperament before the conversation, only difference is i set 11/8 as a free generator, and it found 7 similar to garibaldi at 7-limit. then i noticed tempering out 352/351 tend to get a slightly larger fifth, and that's ''not so compatible'' with the fifth of schismatic close to just. so i gave up. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 02:39, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

FilterNashi: /* about Maqamschismic */

2026-01-23T02:39:02Z

about Maqamschismic

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:39, 23 January 2026
Line 22:		Line 22:

	:: Nevermind, I reserved ''maqamschismic'' for the 2.3.5.11.13 subgroup. ''Tridecaschismic'' it is! Either way, maqamschismic is not the best schismic tuning for maqāmāt, but it is the simplest. And for that, I think it deserves a spot.		:: Nevermind, I reserved ''maqamschismic'' for the 2.3.5.11.13 subgroup. ''Tridecaschismic'' it is! Either way, maqamschismic is not the best schismic tuning for maqāmāt, but it is the simplest. And for that, I think it deserves a spot.

			:: i actually found an extremely similar temperament, only difference is i set 11/8 as a free generator, and it found 7 similar to garibaldi at 7-limit. then i noticed tempering out 352/351 tend to get a slightly larger fifth, and that's ''not so compatible'' with the fifth of schismatic close to just. so i gave up. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 02:39, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Eufalesio at 19:48, 22 January 2026

2026-01-22T19:48:43Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:48, 22 January 2026
Line 20:		Line 20:

	:I chose the name "maqamschismic" because it is based on a chain of fifths, is supported by edos approved by maqam theorists, because it is schismic, and because I like the name. I named it a 2.3.5.13 subgroup because the schismic chain of fifths can be very easily be extended to the 2.3.5.13, so well in fact that Pythagorean tuning can be used. It is where 53edo truly shines. --[[User:Eufalesio\|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio\|talk]]) 18:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)		:I chose the name "maqamschismic" because it is based on a chain of fifths, is supported by edos approved by maqam theorists, because it is schismic, and because I like the name. I named it a 2.3.5.13 subgroup because the schismic chain of fifths can be very easily be extended to the 2.3.5.13, so well in fact that Pythagorean tuning can be used. It is where 53edo truly shines. --[[User:Eufalesio\|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio\|talk]]) 18:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

			:: Nevermind, I reserved ''maqamschismic'' for the 2.3.5.11.13 subgroup. ''Tridecaschismic'' it is! Either way, maqamschismic is not the best schismic tuning for maqāmāt, but it is the simplest. And for that, I think it deserves a spot.

Eufalesio at 18:59, 22 January 2026

2026-01-22T18:59:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 22 January 2026
Line 19:		Line 19:
	ok so the point is tempering 352/351 in somewhere like Jins Rast will give us ''more aesthetically and theoretically correct'' tuning, and I'm agree with that. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 16:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)		ok so the point is tempering 352/351 in somewhere like Jins Rast will give us ''more aesthetically and theoretically correct'' tuning, and I'm agree with that. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 16:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

	:I chose the name "maqamschismic" because it is based on a chain of fifths, is supported by edos approved by maqam theorists, because it is schismic, and because I like the name. ~~At first,~~ I ~~put~~ it as 2.3.5.13 because ~~it's much better there (so much so that Pythagorean tuning is a possible tuning for this temp) than at~~ 2.3.5.~~11(~~.~~13)~~. --[[User:Eufalesio\|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio\|talk]]) 18:48, 22 January 2026 (UTC)		:I chose the name "maqamschismic" because it is based on a chain of fifths, is supported by edos approved by maqam theorists, because it is schismic, and because I like the name. I named it a 2.3.5.13 subgroup because the schismic chain of fifths can be very easily be extended to the 2.3.5.13, so well in fact that Pythagorean tuning can be used. It is where 53edo truly shines. --[[User:Eufalesio\|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio\|talk]]) 18:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Eufalesio at 18:48, 22 January 2026

2026-01-22T18:48:10Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:48, 22 January 2026
Line 18:		Line 18:

	ok so the point is tempering 352/351 in somewhere like Jins Rast will give us ''more aesthetically and theoretically correct'' tuning, and I'm agree with that. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 16:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)		ok so the point is tempering 352/351 in somewhere like Jins Rast will give us ''more aesthetically and theoretically correct'' tuning, and I'm agree with that. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 16:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

			:I chose the name "maqamschismic" because it is based on a chain of fifths, is supported by edos approved by maqam theorists, because it is schismic, and because I like the name. At first, I put it as 2.3.5.13 because it's much better there (so much so that Pythagorean tuning is a possible tuning for this temp) than at 2.3.5.11(.13). --[[User:Eufalesio\|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio\|talk]]) 18:48, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

FilterNashi: /* about Maqamschismic */

2026-01-22T16:17:33Z

about Maqamschismic

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 22 January 2026
Line 16:		Line 16:
	==about Maqamschismic==		==about Maqamschismic==
	assuming that this temperament(Maqamschismic) is meant to explain how to tune Arabic Maqam, and according to the work of Erv Wilson of analysing Jins Rast and Bayati and [http://www.alsiadi.com/Maqam_rast.html]this website, a ''neutral third'' in the Jins Rast might be 27/22 and tuned a comma lower than 5/4, gives us this temperament within 2.3.5.11 subgroup. i didn't know the point of omitting 7 in this temperament, i cannot prove it but it's obvious that Jins Hijaz finds 16/15~15/14 as a augmented unison, and 7/6 as a doubly diminished fourth. Combining both gives us the tempering property exactly identical as Cassandra. And i didn't know the point of 2.3.5.11.13 Maqamschimic too. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 13:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)		assuming that this temperament(Maqamschismic) is meant to explain how to tune Arabic Maqam, and according to the work of Erv Wilson of analysing Jins Rast and Bayati and [http://www.alsiadi.com/Maqam_rast.html]this website, a ''neutral third'' in the Jins Rast might be 27/22 and tuned a comma lower than 5/4, gives us this temperament within 2.3.5.11 subgroup. i didn't know the point of omitting 7 in this temperament, i cannot prove it but it's obvious that Jins Hijaz finds 16/15~15/14 as a augmented unison, and 7/6 as a doubly diminished fourth. Combining both gives us the tempering property exactly identical as Cassandra. And i didn't know the point of 2.3.5.11.13 Maqamschimic too. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 13:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

			ok so the point is tempering 352/351 in somewhere like Jins Rast will give us ''more aesthetically and theoretically correct'' tuning, and I'm agree with that. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 16:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

FilterNashi: /* about Maqamschismic */

2026-01-22T13:28:16Z

about Maqamschismic

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:28, 22 January 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:

	==about Maqamschismic==		==about Maqamschismic==
	assuming that this temperament(Maqamschismic) is meant to explain how to tune Arabic Maqam, and according to the work of Erv Wilson of analysing ~~Jis~~ Rast and Bayati and [http://www.alsiadi.com/Maqam_rast.html]this website, a ''neutral third'' in the Jins Rast might be 27/22 and tuned a comma lower than 5/4, gives us this temperament within 2.3.5.11 subgroup. i didn't know the point of omitting 7 in this temperament, i cannot prove it but it's obvious that Jins Hijaz finds 16/15~15/14 as a augmented unison, and 7/6 as a doubly diminished fourth. Combining both gives us the tempering property exactly identical as Cassandra. And i didn't know the point of 2.3.5.11.13 Maqamschimic too. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 13:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)		assuming that this temperament(Maqamschismic) is meant to explain how to tune Arabic Maqam, and according to the work of Erv Wilson of analysing Jins Rast and Bayati and [http://www.alsiadi.com/Maqam_rast.html]this website, a ''neutral third'' in the Jins Rast might be 27/22 and tuned a comma lower than 5/4, gives us this temperament within 2.3.5.11 subgroup. i didn't know the point of omitting 7 in this temperament, i cannot prove it but it's obvious that Jins Hijaz finds 16/15~15/14 as a augmented unison, and 7/6 as a doubly diminished fourth. Combining both gives us the tempering property exactly identical as Cassandra. And i didn't know the point of 2.3.5.11.13 Maqamschimic too. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 13:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

FilterNashi: /* about Maqamschismic */

2026-01-22T13:15:35Z

about Maqamschismic

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:15, 22 January 2026
Line 15:		Line 15:

	==about Maqamschismic==		==about Maqamschismic==
	assuming that this temperament is meant to explain how to tune Arabic Maqam, and according to the work of Erv Wilson's of analysing Jis Rast and Bayati and [http://www.alsiadi.com/Maqam_rast.html]this website, a ''neutral third'' in the Jins Rast might be 27/22 and tuned a comma lower than 5/4, gives us this temperament within 2.3.5.11 subgroup. i didn't know the point of omitting 7 in this temperament, i cannot prove it but it's obvious that Jins Hijaz finds 16/15~15/14 as a augmented unison, and 7/6 as a doubly diminished fourth. Combining both gives us the tempering property exactly identical as Cassandra. And i didn't know the point of 2.3.5.11.13 Maqamschimic too. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 13:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)		assuming that this temperament(Maqamschismic) is meant to explain how to tune Arabic Maqam, and according to the work of Erv Wilson of analysing Jis Rast and Bayati and [http://www.alsiadi.com/Maqam_rast.html]this website, a ''neutral third'' in the Jins Rast might be 27/22 and tuned a comma lower than 5/4, gives us this temperament within 2.3.5.11 subgroup. i didn't know the point of omitting 7 in this temperament, i cannot prove it but it's obvious that Jins Hijaz finds 16/15~15/14 as a augmented unison, and 7/6 as a doubly diminished fourth. Combining both gives us the tempering property exactly identical as Cassandra. And i didn't know the point of 2.3.5.11.13 Maqamschimic too. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 13:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:44, 23 January 2026
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== Move to "Schismic family" ==		== Move to "Schismic family" ==

	-ismatic is non-standard for temperaments -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 07:18, 19 June 2025 (UTC)		-ismatic is non-standard for temperaments -- [[User:VectorGraphics\|VectorGraphics]] ([[User talk:VectorGraphics\|talk]]) 07:18, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Line 14:		Line 13:
	:::: AFAIK neither is more correct than the other. E.g. ''Systematic'' & ''systemic'' both exist. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 13:22, 20 June 2025 (UTC)		:::: AFAIK neither is more correct than the other. E.g. ''Systematic'' & ''systemic'' both exist. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 13:22, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

	==~~about Maqamschismic~~==		:::: I'm in favor of the move btw. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:44, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

			== About maqamschismic ==
	assuming that this temperament(Maqamschismic) is meant to explain how to tune Arabic Maqam, and according to the work of Erv Wilson of analysing Jins Rast and Bayati and [http://www.alsiadi.com/Maqam_rast.html]this website, a ''neutral third'' in the Jins Rast might be 27/22 and tuned a comma lower than 5/4, gives us this temperament within 2.3.5.11 subgroup. i didn't know the point of omitting 7 in this temperament, i cannot prove it but it's obvious that Jins Hijaz finds 16/15~15/14 as a augmented unison, and 7/6 as a doubly diminished fourth. Combining both gives us the tempering property exactly identical as Cassandra. And i didn't know the point of 2.3.5.11.13 Maqamschimic too. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 13:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)		assuming that this temperament(Maqamschismic) is meant to explain how to tune Arabic Maqam, and according to the work of Erv Wilson of analysing Jins Rast and Bayati and [http://www.alsiadi.com/Maqam_rast.html]this website, a ''neutral third'' in the Jins Rast might be 27/22 and tuned a comma lower than 5/4, gives us this temperament within 2.3.5.11 subgroup. i didn't know the point of omitting 7 in this temperament, i cannot prove it but it's obvious that Jins Hijaz finds 16/15~15/14 as a augmented unison, and 7/6 as a doubly diminished fourth. Combining both gives us the tempering property exactly identical as Cassandra. And i didn't know the point of 2.3.5.11.13 Maqamschimic too. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 13:14, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

	ok so the point is tempering 352/351 in somewhere like Jins Rast will give us ''more aesthetically and theoretically correct'' tuning, and I'm agree with that. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 16:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)		ok so the point is tempering 352/351 in somewhere like Jins Rast will give us ''more aesthetically and theoretically correct'' tuning, and I'm agree with that. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 16:17, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

	:I chose the name "maqamschismic" because it is based on a chain of fifths, is supported by edos approved by maqam theorists, because it is schismic, and because I like the name. I named it a 2.3.5.13 subgroup because the schismic chain of fifths can be very easily be extended to the 2.3.5.13, so well in fact that Pythagorean tuning can be used. It is where 53edo truly shines. --[[User:Eufalesio\|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio\|talk]]) 18:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)		: I chose the name "maqamschismic" because it is based on a chain of fifths, is supported by edos approved by maqam theorists, because it is schismic, and because I like the name. I named it a 2.3.5.13 subgroup because the schismic chain of fifths can be very easily be extended to the 2.3.5.13, so well in fact that Pythagorean tuning can be used. It is where 53edo truly shines. --[[User:Eufalesio\|Eufalesio]] ([[User talk:Eufalesio\|talk]]) 18:59, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

	:: Nevermind, I reserved ''maqamschismic'' for the 2.3.5.11.13 subgroup. ''Tridecaschismic'' it is! Either way, maqamschismic is not the best schismic tuning for maqāmāt, but it is the simplest. And for that, I think it deserves a spot.		:: Nevermind, I reserved ''maqamschismic'' for the 2.3.5.11.13 subgroup. ''Tridecaschismic'' it is! Either way, maqamschismic is not the best schismic tuning for maqāmāt, but it is the simplest. And for that, I think it deserves a spot.

	::: i actually found an extremely similar temperament before the conversation, only difference is i set 11/8 as a free generator, and it found 7 similar to garibaldi at 7-limit. then i noticed tempering out 352/351 tend to get a slightly larger fifth, and that's ''not so compatible'' with the fifth of schismatic close to just. so i gave up. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 02:39, 23 January 2026 (UTC)		::: i actually found an extremely similar temperament before the conversation, only difference is i set 11/8 as a free generator, and it found 7 similar to garibaldi at 7-limit. then i noticed tempering out 352/351 tend to get a slightly larger fifth, and that's ''not so compatible'' with the fifth of schismatic close to just. so i gave up. -[[User:FilterNashi\|FilterNashi]] ([[User talk:FilterNashi\|talk]]) 02:39, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

			: I don't see a point for either 2.3.5.11.13 or 2.3.5.13. They are but restrictions of cassandra and they don't get much more accurate than cassandra by removing the 7. —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:44, 23 January 2026 (UTC)