Talk:Ringer scale - Revision history

BudjarnLambeth: Ask question

2026-02-05T22:14:18Z

Ask question

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 5 February 2026
Line 6:		Line 6:
	: Okay. I did not know there were many such names for this type of tuning until now, although I suppose we should discuss that on the topic you put in [[Talk:ADO]].		: Okay. I did not know there were many such names for this type of tuning until now, although I suppose we should discuss that on the topic you put in [[Talk:ADO]].
	[[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 03:45, 2 March 2023 (UTC)		[[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 03:45, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

			== Should Carlos harmonic be added to the list? ==

			On the [[Carlos harmonic scale]] page, it says that scale is a ringer scale. If it is, should it be added to the list of ringer scales on this page?

			--[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 22:14, 5 February 2026 (UTC)

CompactStar at 03:45, 2 March 2023

2023-03-02T03:45:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:45, 2 March 2023
Line 4:		Line 4:
	: They are rather different, in fact. ADO (aka [[Harmonotonic tuning\|harmonic series segment]], aka [[overtone scale]], aka [[Primodality\|lineal segment]], etc.) describes a contiguous set of harmonics spanning an octave, while a Ringer scale would be a subset which satisfies the criteria mentioned in the article ([[constant structure]], and representing the largest possible continuous sequence of harmonics). Merging the pages would not be beneficial in any way I can think of. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 03:21, 2 March 2023 (UTC)		: They are rather different, in fact. ADO (aka [[Harmonotonic tuning\|harmonic series segment]], aka [[overtone scale]], aka [[Primodality\|lineal segment]], etc.) describes a contiguous set of harmonics spanning an octave, while a Ringer scale would be a subset which satisfies the criteria mentioned in the article ([[constant structure]], and representing the largest possible continuous sequence of harmonics). Merging the pages would not be beneficial in any way I can think of. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 03:21, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

	: Okay. I did not know there were many such names for this ~~scale~~ until now, although I suppose we should discuss that on the topic you put in [[Talk:ADO]].		: Okay. I did not know there were many such names for this type of tuning until now, although I suppose we should discuss that on the topic you put in [[Talk:ADO]].
	[[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 03:45, 2 March 2023 (UTC)		[[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 03:45, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

CompactStar at 03:45, 2 March 2023

2023-03-02T03:45:14Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:45, 2 March 2023
Line 3:		Line 3:

	: They are rather different, in fact. ADO (aka [[Harmonotonic tuning\|harmonic series segment]], aka [[overtone scale]], aka [[Primodality\|lineal segment]], etc.) describes a contiguous set of harmonics spanning an octave, while a Ringer scale would be a subset which satisfies the criteria mentioned in the article ([[constant structure]], and representing the largest possible continuous sequence of harmonics). Merging the pages would not be beneficial in any way I can think of. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 03:21, 2 March 2023 (UTC)		: They are rather different, in fact. ADO (aka [[Harmonotonic tuning\|harmonic series segment]], aka [[overtone scale]], aka [[Primodality\|lineal segment]], etc.) describes a contiguous set of harmonics spanning an octave, while a Ringer scale would be a subset which satisfies the criteria mentioned in the article ([[constant structure]], and representing the largest possible continuous sequence of harmonics). Merging the pages would not be beneficial in any way I can think of. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 03:21, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

			: Okay. I did not know there were many such names for this scale until now, although I suppose we should discuss that on the topic you put in [[Talk:ADO]].
			[[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 03:45, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Fredg999: Change link

2023-03-02T03:28:08Z

Change link

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:28, 2 March 2023
Line 2:		Line 2:
	From my understanding of this article, thhese scales appear to be equal to [[ADO]] (arithmetic or otonal division of the octave) scales. Am I correct? If so, should we consider merging these articles? [[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 01:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)		From my understanding of this article, thhese scales appear to be equal to [[ADO]] (arithmetic or otonal division of the octave) scales. Am I correct? If so, should we consider merging these articles? [[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 01:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

	: They are rather different, in fact. ADO (aka [[harmonic series]] ~~segment~~, aka [[overtone scale]], aka [[Primodality\|lineal segment]], etc.) describes a contiguous set of harmonics spanning an octave, while a Ringer scale would be a subset which satisfies the criteria mentioned in the article ([[constant structure]], and representing the largest possible continuous sequence of harmonics). Merging the pages would not be beneficial in any way I can think of. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 03:21, 2 March 2023 (UTC)		: They are rather different, in fact. ADO (aka [[Harmonotonic tuning\|harmonic series segment]], aka [[overtone scale]], aka [[Primodality\|lineal segment]], etc.) describes a contiguous set of harmonics spanning an octave, while a Ringer scale would be a subset which satisfies the criteria mentioned in the article ([[constant structure]], and representing the largest possible continuous sequence of harmonics). Merging the pages would not be beneficial in any way I can think of. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 03:21, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Fredg999: Add header, reply

2023-03-02T03:21:47Z

Add header, reply

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:21, 2 March 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== Merge with ADO ==
	From my understanding of this article, thhese scales appear to be equal to [[ADO]] (arithmetic or otonal division of the octave) scales. Am I correct? If so, should we consider merging these articles? [[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 01:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)		From my understanding of this article, thhese scales appear to be equal to [[ADO]] (arithmetic or otonal division of the octave) scales. Am I correct? If so, should we consider merging these articles? [[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 01:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

			: They are rather different, in fact. ADO (aka [[harmonic series]] segment, aka [[overtone scale]], aka [[Primodality\|lineal segment]], etc.) describes a contiguous set of harmonics spanning an octave, while a Ringer scale would be a subset which satisfies the criteria mentioned in the article ([[constant structure]], and representing the largest possible continuous sequence of harmonics). Merging the pages would not be beneficial in any way I can think of. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 03:21, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

CompactStar at 01:07, 2 March 2023

2023-03-02T01:07:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:07, 2 March 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	From my understanding of this article, thhese scales appear to be equal to [[ADO]] (arithmetic or otonal division of the octave) scales, ~~although I might be incorrect. Should~~ we consider merging these articles? [[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 01:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)		From my understanding of this article, thhese scales appear to be equal to [[ADO]] (arithmetic or otonal division of the octave) scales. Am I correct? If so, should we consider merging these articles? [[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 01:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

CompactStar at 01:06, 2 March 2023

2023-03-02T01:06:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:06, 2 March 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	From my understanding of this article, thhese scales appear to be equal to [[ADO]] (arithmetic or otonal division of the octave) scales. Should we consider merging these articles? [[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 01:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)		From my understanding of this article, thhese scales appear to be equal to [[ADO]] (arithmetic or otonal division of the octave) scales, although I might be incorrect. Should we consider merging these articles? [[User:CompactStar\|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar\|talk]]) 01:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

CompactStar: Created page with "From my understanding of this article, thhese scales appear to be equal to ADO (arithmetic or otonal division of the octave) scales. Should we consider merging these artic..."

2023-03-02T01:06:13Z

Created page with "From my understanding of this article, thhese scales appear to be equal to ADO (arithmetic or otonal division of the octave) scales. Should we consider merging these artic..."

New page

From my understanding of this article, thhese scales appear to be equal to [[ADO]] (arithmetic or otonal division of the octave) scales. Should we consider merging these articles? [[User:CompactStar|CompactStar]] ([[User talk:CompactStar|talk]]) 01:06, 2 March 2023 (UTC)