Talk:Primodality - Revision history

Cmloegcmluin at 19:23, 30 March 2021

2021-03-30T19:23:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:23, 30 March 2021
Line 11:		Line 11:

	::::: No disagreement from me. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 15:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)		::::: No disagreement from me. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 15:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

			:::::: Okay, thanks. Done. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 19:23, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

FloraC: re

2021-03-29T15:29:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:29, 29 March 2021
Line 9:		Line 9:
	:::: I'll continue the conversation about circulating vs. well temperament on its page: https://en.xen.wiki/w/Talk:Circulating_temperament		:::: I'll continue the conversation about circulating vs. well temperament on its page: https://en.xen.wiki/w/Talk:Circulating_temperament
	:::: Regardless if neji are a special case of any or many other tuning concepts, is there disagreement that a safe and appropriate choice is to extract neji to its own dedicated page, which could be linked to any or all tuning concepts it is related to or a special case of? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 14:47, 29 March 2021 (UTC)		:::: Regardless if neji are a special case of any or many other tuning concepts, is there disagreement that a safe and appropriate choice is to extract neji to its own dedicated page, which could be linked to any or all tuning concepts it is related to or a special case of? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 14:47, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

			::::: No disagreement from me. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 15:29, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Cmloegcmluin at 14:47, 29 March 2021

2021-03-29T14:47:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:47, 29 March 2021
Line 6:		Line 6:

	::: Now that there're nejis, circulating temperaments can be a broader term than well temperaments. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)		::: Now that there're nejis, circulating temperaments can be a broader term than well temperaments. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

			:::: I'll continue the conversation about circulating vs. well temperament on its page: https://en.xen.wiki/w/Talk:Circulating_temperament
			:::: Regardless if neji are a special case of any or many other tuning concepts, is there disagreement that a safe and appropriate choice is to extract neji to its own dedicated page, which could be linked to any or all tuning concepts it is related to or a special case of? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 14:47, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

FloraC: re

2021-03-29T08:51:45Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:51, 29 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I suggest that the concept of a neji, the rational approximation of an EDO, is independent from primodality, the use of prime mode of the harmonic series, and therefore it should be extracted to its own page. But I'm still new to Zheanism so if that's not the case, maybe it should be clarified on this article. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 23:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)		I suggest that the concept of a neji, the rational approximation of an EDO, is independent from primodality, the use of prime mode of the harmonic series, and therefore it should be extracted to its own page. But I'm still new to Zheanism so if that's not the case, maybe it should be clarified on this article. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 23:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

	: I'd consider them a special case of [[circulating temperament]], personally. --[[User:Flirora\|Flirora]] ([[User talk:Flirora\|talk]]) 00:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)		: I'd consider them a special case of [[circulating temperament]], personally. --[[User:Flirora\|Flirora]] ([[User talk:Flirora\|talk]]) 00:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

	:: Thanks for the comment. I'd never heard that term before, "circulating temperament". It looks like it's a Gene-ism; I can't figure out what the difference is between it and well temperament (Gene himself seems to have originally introduced it as a synonym: https://www.webcitation.org/5xemAJsWE). So I don't see the connection myself between it a quasi-rational equal tuning. Are you suggesting that neji be moved to instead be a subtopic of the circulating temperament, rather than be extracted to its own dedicated page? Are you specifically against extracting it to its own dedicated page for any reason independent of circulating temperament? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 00:47, 29 March 2021 (UTC)		:: Thanks for the comment. I'd never heard that term before, "circulating temperament". It looks like it's a Gene-ism; I can't figure out what the difference is between it and well temperament (Gene himself seems to have originally introduced it as a synonym: https://www.webcitation.org/5xemAJsWE). So I don't see the connection myself between it a quasi-rational equal tuning. Are you suggesting that neji be moved to instead be a subtopic of the circulating temperament, rather than be extracted to its own dedicated page? Are you specifically against extracting it to its own dedicated page for any reason independent of circulating temperament? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 00:47, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

			::: Now that there're nejis, circulating temperaments can be a broader term than well temperaments. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 08:51, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Cmloegcmluin at 00:47, 29 March 2021

2021-03-29T00:47:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:47, 29 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I suggest that the concept of a neji, the rational approximation of an EDO, is independent from primodality, the use of prime mode of the harmonic series, and therefore it should be extracted to its own page. But I'm still new to Zheanism so if that's not the case, maybe it should be clarified on this article. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 23:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)		I suggest that the concept of a neji, the rational approximation of an EDO, is independent from primodality, the use of prime mode of the harmonic series, and therefore it should be extracted to its own page. But I'm still new to Zheanism so if that's not the case, maybe it should be clarified on this article. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 23:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
	: I'd consider them a special case of [[circulating temperament]], personally. --[[User:Flirora\|Flirora]] ([[User talk:Flirora\|talk]]) 00:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)		: I'd consider them a special case of [[circulating temperament]], personally. --[[User:Flirora\|Flirora]] ([[User talk:Flirora\|talk]]) 00:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
			:: Thanks for the comment. I'd never heard that term before, "circulating temperament". It looks like it's a Gene-ism; I can't figure out what the difference is between it and well temperament (Gene himself seems to have originally introduced it as a synonym: https://www.webcitation.org/5xemAJsWE). So I don't see the connection myself between it a quasi-rational equal tuning. Are you suggesting that neji be moved to instead be a subtopic of the circulating temperament, rather than be extracted to its own dedicated page? Are you specifically against extracting it to its own dedicated page for any reason independent of circulating temperament? --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 00:47, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Flirora at 00:24, 29 March 2021

2021-03-29T00:24:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:24, 29 March 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I suggest that the concept of a neji, the rational approximation of an EDO, is independent from primodality, the use of prime mode of the harmonic series, and therefore it should be extracted to its own page. But I'm still new to Zheanism so if that's not the case, maybe it should be clarified on this article. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 23:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)		I suggest that the concept of a neji, the rational approximation of an EDO, is independent from primodality, the use of prime mode of the harmonic series, and therefore it should be extracted to its own page. But I'm still new to Zheanism so if that's not the case, maybe it should be clarified on this article. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 23:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
			: I'd consider them a special case of [[circulating temperament]], personally. --[[User:Flirora\|Flirora]] ([[User talk:Flirora\|talk]]) 00:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Cmloegcmluin: Created page with "I suggest that the concept of a neji, the rational approximation of an EDO, is independent from primodality, the use of prime mode of the harmonic series, and therefore it sho..."

2021-03-28T23:43:18Z

Created page with "I suggest that the concept of a neji, the rational approximation of an EDO, is independent from primodality, the use of prime mode of the harmonic series, and therefore it sho..."

New page

I suggest that the concept of a neji, the rational approximation of an EDO, is independent from primodality, the use of prime mode of the harmonic series, and therefore it should be extracted to its own page. But I'm still new to Zheanism so if that's not the case, maybe it should be clarified on this article. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 23:43, 28 March 2021 (UTC)