Talk:Prime number - Revision history

FloraC: /* Factorization */ re

2021-07-04T12:46:34Z

Factorization: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:46, 4 July 2021
Line 4:		Line 4:

	I think we should, besides the [[Wikipedia: Fundamental theorem of arithmetic\|Fundamental theorem of arithmetic]], we should add some information about the relation between prime numbers and ratios. Maybe factorization hints as well? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 11:41, 4 July 2021 (UTC)		I think we should, besides the [[Wikipedia: Fundamental theorem of arithmetic\|Fundamental theorem of arithmetic]], we should add some information about the relation between prime numbers and ratios. Maybe factorization hints as well? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 11:41, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

			: I added a sentence for that. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 12:46, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Xenwolf: /* Factorization */ new section

2021-07-04T11:41:16Z

Factorization: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:41, 4 July 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WSArchiveLink}}		{{WSArchiveLink}}

			== Factorization ==

			I think we should, besides the [[Wikipedia: Fundamental theorem of arithmetic\|Fundamental theorem of arithmetic]], we should add some information about the relation between prime numbers and ratios. Maybe factorization hints as well? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 11:41, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Xenwolf: Xenwolf moved page Talk:Prime numbers to Talk:Prime number: rule: use singular form for lemma; reason: easier to link by adding the s needed in the text like monzos

2020-06-12T14:13:45Z

Xenwolf moved page Talk:Prime numbers to Talk:Prime number: rule: use singular form for lemma; reason: easier to link by adding the s needed in the text like monzos

← Older revision	Revision as of 14:13, 12 June 2020
(No difference)

Mike Battaglia: 1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage

2018-10-01T18:02:41Z

1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:02, 1 October 2018
(No difference)

WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia: Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' ''...

2018-10-01T18:01:16Z

Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 1 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =~~		{{WSArchiveLink}}
	~~'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''~~

	~~<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.~~

	~~----~~

	~~== Please, more 'precisione' in the redaction! ==~~
	~~The wording of this page is not quite understandable. Please someone write better descriptions here said.~~

	~~- '''Osmiorisbendi''' July 18, 2011, 01:46:51 PM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~Which of the words or expressions would you consider not understandable?~~

	~~- '''hstraub''' January 26, 2012, 12:58:29 AM UTC-0800~~
	~~----~~
	~~Perhaps we should explain these terms:~~

	1. "composite", as used in the expression "For composite EDOs, ...", means "non-prime" (since any such number can be considered to be "composed" of its multiplicative factors; e.g. the composite integer 6 is the product of multiplying the prime numbers 2 and 3).

	2. "co-prime": Two integers are co-prime if they have no common prime factors; e.g. 14 and 15 are co-prime since 14 has only the prime factors 2 and 7 whilst 15 has only the prime factors 3 and 5, so they share no common prime factor.

	~~- '''YahyaA''' October 29, 2015, 06:06:21 PM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~The terms "xenharmonician" and "ekmelician" are surely incomprehensible to most people, including many of our readers. (What DOES that second word mean?!)~~

	~~- '''YahyaA''' October 29, 2015, 06:09:24 PM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~

Mike Battaglia: Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' ''...

2018-09-20T07:00:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 20 September 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =		= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
	'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''		'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''

			<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.

	----		----

Wikispaces>FREEZE at 00:00, 17 July 2018

2018-07-17T00:00:00Z

New page

= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
----

== Please, more 'precisione' in the redaction! ==
The wording of this page is not quite understandable. Please someone write better descriptions here said.

- '''Osmiorisbendi''' July 18, 2011, 01:46:51 PM UTC-0700
----
Which of the words or expressions would you consider not understandable?

- '''hstraub''' January 26, 2012, 12:58:29 AM UTC-0800
----
Perhaps we should explain these terms:

1. "composite", as used in the expression "For composite EDOs, ...", means "non-prime" (since any such number can be considered to be "composed" of its multiplicative factors; e.g. the composite integer 6 is the product of multiplying the prime numbers 2 and 3).

2. "co-prime": Two integers are co-prime if they have no common prime factors; e.g. 14 and 15 are co-prime since 14 has only the prime factors 2 and 7 whilst 15 has only the prime factors 3 and 5, so they share no common prime factor.

- '''YahyaA''' October 29, 2015, 06:06:21 PM UTC-0700
----
The terms "xenharmonician" and "ekmelician" are surely incomprehensible to most people, including many of our readers. (What DOES that second word mean?!)

- '''YahyaA''' October 29, 2015, 06:09:24 PM UTC-0700
----