Talk:MicrotonalTheory - Revision history

Fredg999: /* Merge into Approaches to musical tuning? */ new section

2022-03-09T04:21:42Z

Merge into Approaches to musical tuning?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:21, 9 March 2022
Line 5:		Line 5:
	So on the quote "not discoveries but inventions," there's a link leading to some PDF file that either has the wrong link or is gone. Can I ask if there is a point for this, and if there is, can we find the original PDF again?		So on the quote "not discoveries but inventions," there's a link leading to some PDF file that either has the wrong link or is gone. Can I ask if there is a point for this, and if there is, can we find the original PDF again?
	--[[User:CritDeathX\|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX\|talk]]) 14:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)		--[[User:CritDeathX\|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX\|talk]]) 14:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

			== Merge into Approaches to musical tuning? ==

			It looks like in 2014, most of the contents of this page were copied to a new page called [[Approaches to musical tuning]]. Now, it would probably make sense to keep the older page and merge the newer one into it, but I have a preference for "Approaches to musical tuning" for the title; if I want to be pedantic, I'd even suggest something like "Outline of approaches to musical tuning". Also, the shorter introduction on the "new page' also seems sufficient for now, it's better categorized, etc. The links at the bottom are probably already noted elsewhere on the wiki, although double-checking just in case that wouldn't take long. Therefore, I propose the merge. Any thoughts? --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 04:21, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

CritDeathX: /* Confusing Dead Link */

2020-03-12T14:42:46Z

Confusing Dead Link

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:42, 12 March 2020
Line 3:		Line 3:
	== Confusing Dead Link ==		== Confusing Dead Link ==

	So on the quote "not ~~theories~~ but inventions," there's a link leading to some PDF file that either has the wrong link or is gone. Can I ask if there is a point for this, and if there is, can we find the original PDF again?		So on the quote "not discoveries but inventions," there's a link leading to some PDF file that either has the wrong link or is gone. Can I ask if there is a point for this, and if there is, can we find the original PDF again?
	--[[User:CritDeathX\|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX\|talk]]) 14:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)		--[[User:CritDeathX\|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX\|talk]]) 14:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

CritDeathX: /* Confusing Dead Link */ new section

2020-03-12T14:42:11Z

Confusing Dead Link: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:42, 12 March 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WSArchiveLink}}		{{WSArchiveLink}}

			== Confusing Dead Link ==

			So on the quote "not theories but inventions," there's a link leading to some PDF file that either has the wrong link or is gone. Can I ask if there is a point for this, and if there is, can we find the original PDF again?
			--[[User:CritDeathX\|CritDeathX]] ([[User talk:CritDeathX\|talk]]) 14:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)

Mike Battaglia: 1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage

2018-10-01T18:02:39Z

1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:02, 1 October 2018
(No difference)

WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia: Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' ''...

2018-10-01T18:01:16Z

Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 1 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =~~		{{WSArchiveLink}}
	~~'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''~~

	~~<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.~~

	~~----~~

	~~== EDO theory links to EDO pages? ==~~
	~~Since each EDO now has its own page, maybe the EDO theory links here should be moved there?~~

	~~Besides, I am, once more, asking myself what the distinction between "Theory" and "Scales" is...~~

	~~- '''hstraub''' May 29, 2007, 01:11:32 PM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~I moved the EDO theory links to the repective EDO pages - and also the otonal 17 link.~~

	~~I think we could organize each EDO page into 3 paragraphs: theory - scales - compositions. 17edo is already like that.~~

	~~Still wondering about what to do with the "scales" page...~~

	~~- '''hstraub''' June 01, 2007, 01:46:12 PM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~

	~~== nixed the links ==~~
	I'm hoping this becomes a place especially for building new structures of information and knowledge and pedagogy within the domain of microtonal theory, and I don't see the need right now for a list of external links without any guide as to how to peruse those links.

	~~- '''xenjacob''' February 15, 2007, 07:47:41 PM UTC-0800~~
	~~----~~
	Just a list of links without any guide does indeed not make that much sense. Yet I think links with guide ought to be there, since there is quite some amount of microtonal theory on the web that I consider relevant. I would say that Monz's encyclopedia on tuning terms should be there at least. And maybe Paul Erlich's paper on 22-tone theory, parallel to the 17-tone theory on this wiki?

	~~- '''hstraub''' March 25, 2007, 10:51:28 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~yes. I think if we could have a guide to monz's encyclopedia, like groups of topics, e.g. "read these articles in this order to better understand x", i think that could be great. now, to do it...~~

	~~- '''xenjacob''' March 25, 2007, 10:55:46 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~

Mike Battaglia: Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' ''...

2018-09-20T07:00:37Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 20 September 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =		= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
	'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''		'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''

			<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.

	----		----

Wikispaces>FREEZE at 00:00, 17 July 2018

2018-07-17T00:00:00Z

New page

= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
----

== EDO theory links to EDO pages? ==
Since each EDO now has its own page, maybe the EDO theory links here should be moved there?

Besides, I am, once more, asking myself what the distinction between "Theory" and "Scales" is...

- '''hstraub''' May 29, 2007, 01:11:32 PM UTC-0700
----
I moved the EDO theory links to the repective EDO pages - and also the otonal 17 link.

I think we could organize each EDO page into 3 paragraphs: theory - scales - compositions. 17edo is already like that.

Still wondering about what to do with the "scales" page...

- '''hstraub''' June 01, 2007, 01:46:12 PM UTC-0700
----

== nixed the links ==
I'm hoping this becomes a place especially for building new structures of information and knowledge and pedagogy within the domain of microtonal theory, and I don't see the need right now for a list of external links without any guide as to how to peruse those links.

- '''xenjacob''' February 15, 2007, 07:47:41 PM UTC-0800
----
Just a list of links without any guide does indeed not make that much sense. Yet I think links *with* guide ought to be there, since there is quite some amount of microtonal theory on the web that I consider relevant. I would say that Monz's encyclopedia on tuning terms should be there at least. And maybe Paul Erlich's paper on 22-tone theory, parallel to the 17-tone theory on this wiki?

- '''hstraub''' March 25, 2007, 10:51:28 AM UTC-0700
----
yes. I think if we could have a guide to monz's encyclopedia, like groups of topics, e.g. "read these articles in this order to better understand x", i think that could be great. now, to do it...

- '''xenjacob''' March 25, 2007, 10:55:46 AM UTC-0700
----