Talk:Mathematical theory of regular temperaments - Revision history

Sintel: /* 'map list' */

2025-06-22T11:49:11Z

'map list'

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:49, 22 June 2025
Line 14:		Line 14:

	: The section is about representing temps using mapping matrices, not which form they are in, right? How about ''normal mapping matrix'' (and ''normal comma basis'' for the next section)? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:10, 22 June 2025 (UTC)		: The section is about representing temps using mapping matrices, not which form they are in, right? How about ''normal mapping matrix'' (and ''normal comma basis'' for the next section)? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:10, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

			:: Fine by me! – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 11:49, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

FloraC: Re

2025-06-22T11:10:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:10, 22 June 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Consolidate RREF in with other normal lists? ==		== Consolidate RREF in with other normal lists? ==

	In this section of the page ([[Mathematical_theory_of_regular_temperaments #Reduced_row_echelon_form]]), RREF is given as a separate means of identifying temperaments besides normal lists. But isn't it really just a different normal type? Unlike the other options, it's just a different form for a mapping or comma matrix. I suggest we should remove it from this page and put on the [[normal lists]] page. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 00:32, 6 November 2021 (UTC)		In this section of the page ([[Mathematical_theory_of_regular_temperaments #Reduced_row_echelon_form]]), RREF is given as a separate means of identifying temperaments besides normal lists. But isn't it really just a different normal type? Unlike the other options, it's just a different form for a mapping or comma matrix. I suggest we should remove it from this page and put on the [[normal lists]] page. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 00:32, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Line 8:		Line 7:

	== Concern about nonstandard symbol used for interior product ==		== Concern about nonstandard symbol used for interior product ==

	I believe the symbol used on this page for the interior product is actually the standard symbol for the regressive product. It's consistent with the page on this wiki for interior product, but I think that page could be made more standard as well. Please see: [[Talk:Interior product]] --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 17:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)		I believe the symbol used on this page for the interior product is actually the standard symbol for the regressive product. It's consistent with the page on this wiki for interior product, but I think that page could be made more standard as well. Please see: [[Talk:Interior product]] --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 17:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)


	== 'map list' ==		== 'map list' ==

	Since we just agreed on calling them normal forms on [[Talk:Normal forms#Title]], I don't really understand the insistence on "normal map list".		Since we just agreed on calling them normal forms on [[Talk:Normal forms#Title]], I don't really understand the insistence on "normal map list".
	Of course you can call a matrix a 'list of rows' but it is just as well a list of columns! – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 10:42, 22 June 2025 (UTC)		Of course you can call a matrix a 'list of rows' but it is just as well a list of columns! – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 10:42, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

			: The section is about representing temps using mapping matrices, not which form they are in, right? How about ''normal mapping matrix'' (and ''normal comma basis'' for the next section)? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 11:10, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Sintel at 10:42, 22 June 2025

2025-06-22T10:42:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:42, 22 June 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:

	I believe the symbol used on this page for the interior product is actually the standard symbol for the regressive product. It's consistent with the page on this wiki for interior product, but I think that page could be made more standard as well. Please see: [[Talk:Interior product]] --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 17:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)		I believe the symbol used on this page for the interior product is actually the standard symbol for the regressive product. It's consistent with the page on this wiki for interior product, but I think that page could be made more standard as well. Please see: [[Talk:Interior product]] --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 17:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)


			== 'map list' ==

			Since we just agreed on calling them normal forms on [[Talk:Normal forms#Title]], I don't really understand the insistence on "normal map list".
			Of course you can call a matrix a 'list of rows' but it is just as well a list of columns! – [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 10:42, 22 June 2025 (UTC)

Cmloegcmluin at 17:31, 11 December 2021

2021-12-11T17:31:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:31, 11 December 2021
Line 6:		Line 6:

	:: Done. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 21:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)		:: Done. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 21:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

			== Concern about nonstandard symbol used for interior product ==

			I believe the symbol used on this page for the interior product is actually the standard symbol for the regressive product. It's consistent with the page on this wiki for interior product, but I think that page could be made more standard as well. Please see: [[Talk:Interior product]] --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 17:31, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Cmloegcmluin at 21:55, 8 November 2021

2021-11-08T21:55:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:55, 8 November 2021
Line 4:		Line 4:

	: Agree. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 00:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)		: Agree. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 00:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

			:: Done. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 21:55, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

FloraC at 00:51, 6 November 2021

2021-11-06T00:51:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:51, 6 November 2021
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==~~= consolidate~~ RREF in with other normal lists? ===		== Consolidate RREF in with other normal lists? ==

	In this section of the page ([[Mathematical_theory_of_regular_temperaments#Reduced_row_echelon_form]]), RREF is given as a separate means of identifying temperaments besides normal lists. But isn't it really just a different normal type? Unlike the other options, it's just a different form for a mapping or comma matrix. I suggest we should remove it from this page and put on the [[normal lists]] page. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 00:32, 6 November 2021 (UTC)		In this section of the page ([[Mathematical_theory_of_regular_temperaments #Reduced_row_echelon_form]]), RREF is given as a separate means of identifying temperaments besides normal lists. But isn't it really just a different normal type? Unlike the other options, it's just a different form for a mapping or comma matrix. I suggest we should remove it from this page and put on the [[normal lists]] page. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 00:32, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

			: Agree. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 00:51, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Cmloegcmluin: Created page with "=== consolidate RREF in with other normal lists? === In this section of the page (Mathematical_theory_of_regular_temperaments#Reduced_row_echelon_form), RREF is given as..."

2021-11-06T00:32:06Z

Created page with "=== consolidate RREF in with other normal lists? === In this section of the page (Mathematical_theory_of_regular_temperaments#Reduced_row_echelon_form), RREF is given as..."

New page

=== consolidate RREF in with other normal lists? ===

In this section of the page ([[Mathematical_theory_of_regular_temperaments#Reduced_row_echelon_form]]), RREF is given as a separate means of identifying temperaments besides normal lists. But isn't it really just a different normal type? Unlike the other options, it's just a different form for a mapping or comma matrix. I suggest we should remove it from this page and put on the [[normal lists]] page. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin|talk]]) 00:32, 6 November 2021 (UTC)