Talk:List of octave-reduced harmonics - Revision history

TallKite at 23:19, 21 October 2024

2024-10-21T23:19:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:19, 21 October 2024
Line 6:		Line 6:

	: I think it's good to have the octave there for reference and explicitly indicate fact that it's there for reference. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 22:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)		: I think it's good to have the octave there for reference and explicitly indicate fact that it's there for reference. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 22:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

			== Missing Harmonics ==
			83 and 107 are missing --[[User:TallKite\|TallKite]] ([[User talk:TallKite\|talk]]) 23:19, 21 October 2024 (UTC)

Wolftune: Wolftune moved page Talk:List of overtones to Talk:List of octave-reduced harmonics: These are not overtones, even the list starts with 1 as the fundamental

2022-01-22T20:17:19Z

Wolftune moved page Talk:List of overtones to Talk:List of octave-reduced harmonics: These are not overtones, even the list starts with 1 as the fundamental

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:17, 22 January 2022
(No difference)

Aura at 22:52, 27 October 2020

2020-10-27T22:52:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:52, 27 October 2020
Line 4:		Line 4:

	If we octave reduce the octave we get the unison. After making the first two columns sortable, having 2 in a list of entirely odd numbers seems wrong to me. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 21:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)		If we octave reduce the octave we get the unison. After making the first two columns sortable, having 2 in a list of entirely odd numbers seems wrong to me. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 21:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

			: I think it's good to have the octave there for reference and explicitly indicate fact that it's there for reference. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 22:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Xenwolf: /* Remove 2? */ new section

2020-10-27T21:43:00Z

Remove 2?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:43, 27 October 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WSArchiveLink}}		{{WSArchiveLink}}

			== Remove 2? ==

			If we octave reduce the octave we get the unison. After making the first two columns sortable, having 2 in a list of entirely odd numbers seems wrong to me. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 21:43, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Xenwolf: Xenwolf moved page Talk:ListOfOvertones to Talk:List of overtones: Rule: replace WikiCase lemma by normal written form. Reason: less typing when referenced

2020-06-12T07:58:22Z

Xenwolf moved page Talk:ListOfOvertones to Talk:List of overtones: Rule: replace WikiCase lemma by normal written form. Reason: less typing when referenced

← Older revision	Revision as of 07:58, 12 June 2020
(No difference)

Mike Battaglia: 1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage

2018-10-01T18:02:38Z

1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:02, 1 October 2018
(No difference)

WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia: Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' ''...

2018-10-01T18:01:16Z

Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 1 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =~~		{{WSArchiveLink}}
	~~'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''~~

	~~<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.~~

	~~----~~

	~~== octave reduces octave ==~~
	~~I'm not sure what is better to understand in a table that is based on octave reduction: summing up all octaves within the unison or add an own entry for the octave.~~

	~~- '''xenwolf''' October 05, 2015, 12:41:29 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~

Mike Battaglia: Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' ''...

2018-09-20T07:00:33Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 20 September 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =		= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
	'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''		'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''

			<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.

	----		----

Wikispaces>FREEZE at 00:00, 17 July 2018

2018-07-17T00:00:00Z

New page

= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
----

== octave reduces octave ==
I'm not sure what is better to understand in a table that is based on octave reduction: summing up all octaves within the unison or add an own entry for the octave.

- '''xenwolf''' October 05, 2015, 12:41:29 AM UTC-0700
----