<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ALandscape_microtemperaments</id>
	<title>Talk:Landscape microtemperaments - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Talk%3ALandscape_microtemperaments"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Landscape_microtemperaments&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-07-15T06:37:47Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.6</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Landscape_microtemperaments&amp;diff=228421&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>FloraC: Created page with &quot;== Extensions == ; Septichrome : 13-limit semiseptichrome is questionable as it&#039;s much less accurate than the 11-limit, tho it &#039;&#039;is&#039;&#039; the central segment so idk.   ; Slendscape : 13-limit is questionable, but contrary to the case with semiseptichrome, this one is more complex. Perhaps it&#039;s okay to be (c.f. 13-limit trisedodge) but 15 &amp; 270 deserves a catalog. I&#039;m not fond of the name &#039;&#039;slendscape&#039;&#039; itself however cuz it&#039;s derived from &#039;&#039;slendroschisma&#039;&#039;.   ; Avicenna : T...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Landscape_microtemperaments&amp;diff=228421&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-04-24T15:04:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;== Extensions == ; Septichrome : 13-limit semiseptichrome is questionable as it&amp;#039;s much less accurate than the 11-limit, tho it &amp;#039;&amp;#039;is&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the central segment so idk.   ; Slendscape : 13-limit is questionable, but contrary to the case with semiseptichrome, this one is more complex. Perhaps it&amp;#039;s okay to be (c.f. 13-limit trisedodge) but 15 &amp;amp; 270 deserves a catalog. I&amp;#039;m not fond of the name &amp;#039;&amp;#039;slendscape&amp;#039;&amp;#039; itself however cuz it&amp;#039;s derived from &amp;#039;&amp;#039;slendroschisma&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.   ; Avicenna : T...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;== Extensions ==&lt;br /&gt;
; Septichrome&lt;br /&gt;
: 13-limit semiseptichrome is questionable as it&amp;#039;s much less accurate than the 11-limit, tho it &amp;#039;&amp;#039;is&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the central segment so idk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; Slendscape&lt;br /&gt;
: 13-limit is questionable, but contrary to the case with semiseptichrome, this one is more complex. Perhaps it&amp;#039;s okay to be (c.f. 13-limit trisedodge) but 15 &amp;amp; 270 deserves a catalog. I&amp;#039;m not fond of the name &amp;#039;&amp;#039;slendscape&amp;#039;&amp;#039; itself however cuz it&amp;#039;s derived from &amp;#039;&amp;#039;slendroschisma&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; Avicenna&lt;br /&gt;
: The 17- and 19-limit versions (added by User: Gud2228 in 2022) are questionable. For example it&amp;#039;s not supported by 357. Feels like an edge case so idk. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
; Sextile&lt;br /&gt;
: The 17- and 19-limit versions (added by User: Gud2228 in 2022) are very questionable, perhaps should be replaced with no-17 19-limit. The 13-limit extension &amp;quot;sextilia&amp;quot; (12 &amp;amp; 270, also added by User: Gud2228 in 2022) looks useless; I think it can be safely deleted. If anything 12e &amp;amp; 270 deserves a catalog. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
—[[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 15:03, 24 April 2026 (UTC)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>FloraC</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>