Talk:Just intonation - Revision history

FloraC: This should work fine without {{clear}} now

2025-04-14T16:11:57Z

This should work fine without {{clear}} now

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:11, 14 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{High priority~~}}{{clear~~}}		{{High priority}}
	{{WSArchiveLink}}		{{WSArchiveLink}}

ArrowHead294 at 13:56, 14 April 2025

2025-04-14T13:56:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:56, 14 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
			{{High priority}}{{clear}}
	{{WSArchiveLink}}		{{WSArchiveLink}}
	~~{{High priority}}~~

ArrowHead294: Undid revision 190738 by ArrowHead294 (talk)

2025-04-10T22:04:20Z

Undid revision 190738 by ArrowHead294 (talk)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:04, 10 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WSArchiveLink}}		{{WSArchiveLink}}
			{{High priority}}

ArrowHead294 at 21:55, 10 April 2025

2025-04-10T21:55:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:55, 10 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WSArchiveLink}}		{{WSArchiveLink}}
	~~{{High priority}}~~

Fredg999: Move high priority to talk page

2025-04-10T17:07:07Z

Move high priority to talk page

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:07, 10 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WSArchiveLink}}		{{WSArchiveLink}}
			{{High priority}}

Mike Battaglia: 1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage

2018-10-01T18:02:37Z

1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:02, 1 October 2018
(No difference)

WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia: Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' ''...

2018-10-01T18:01:16Z

Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 1 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =~~		{{WSArchiveLink}}
	~~'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''~~

	~~<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.~~

	~~----~~

	~~== JI ==~~
	I created a new article by going back to an older version of this one, because I don't like this article (a lot of useless blah blah blah so far as I can see) but other people do. So let's have two articles!

	~~- '''genewardsmith''' January 29, 2012, 03:11:40 AM UTC-0800~~
	~~----~~
	~~Thank you. I was trying to clean up the old one, but I was afraid people would get mad if I removed their sentences entirely. We definitely need something concise and to the point.~~

	~~- '''Sarzadoce''' January 29, 2012, 02:42:21 PM UTC-0800~~
	~~----~~

	~~== omission of JI propaganda statement. ==~~
	~~It does not serve the unbiased nature to have such a thing included.~~

	~~One could as easily say that those that temper become troubled by those who point out that temperments can be appox. by JI.~~

	~~- '''kraiggrady''' November 01, 2010, 04:31:27 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	Yes Kraig, I agree with your removing that section. I'm less interested in th "biased/unbiased" argument than simply th argument that "them's fightin' words." Phrases in particular: "some people", "pig-headed", "quasi-religious", etc. I don't want to welcome that kind of verbal violence in this community.

	~~If somebody wants to write an opinionated article on another page, add a link to it on th JI page, and sign their name to it, that would be different, imho.~~

	~~Not that there are any policies in place....~~

	~~- '''Andrew_Heathwaite''' November 01, 2010, 12:05:15 PM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~We can't jump from an "a,b,c" definition to neologism-laden filligreed stuff in the same paragraph. This is tantamount to simply writing "go away, sane folk!"~~

	~~- '''lobawad''' July 04, 2011, 02:04:28 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~

Mike Battaglia: Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' ''...

2018-09-20T07:00:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 20 September 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =		= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
	'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''		'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''

			<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.

	----		----

Wikispaces>FREEZE at 00:00, 17 July 2018

2018-07-17T00:00:00Z

New page

= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
----

== JI ==
I created a new article by going back to an older version of this one, because I don't like this article (a lot of useless blah blah blah so far as I can see) but other people do. So let's have two articles!

- '''genewardsmith''' January 29, 2012, 03:11:40 AM UTC-0800
----
Thank you. I was trying to clean up the old one, but I was afraid people would get mad if I removed their sentences entirely. We definitely need something concise and to the point.

- '''Sarzadoce''' January 29, 2012, 02:42:21 PM UTC-0800
----

== omission of JI propaganda statement. ==
It does not serve the unbiased nature to have such a thing included.

One could as easily say that those that temper become troubled by those who point out that temperments can be appox. by JI.

- '''kraiggrady''' November 01, 2010, 04:31:27 AM UTC-0700
----
Yes Kraig, I agree with your removing that section. I'm less interested in th "biased/unbiased" argument than simply th argument that "them's fightin' words." Phrases in particular: "some people", "pig-headed", "quasi-religious", etc. I don't want to welcome that kind of verbal violence in this community.

If somebody wants to write an opinionated article on another page, add a link to it on th JI page, and sign their name to it, that would be different, imho.

Not that there are any policies in place....

- '''Andrew_Heathwaite''' November 01, 2010, 12:05:15 PM UTC-0700
----
We can't jump from an "a,b,c" definition to neologism-laden filligreed stuff in the same paragraph. This is tantamount to simply writing "go away, sane folk!"

- '''lobawad''' July 04, 2011, 02:04:28 AM UTC-0700
----