Talk:Generalized Tenney norms and Tp interval space - Revision history

Cmloegcmluin: reminder to admins w/ editing rights

2023-05-06T22:58:32Z

reminder to admins w/ editing rights

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:58, 6 May 2023
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Through Mike's personal wiki page ([[User:Mike Battaglia]]) just now I discovered the page [[Generalized Tenney Dual Norms and Tp Tuning Space]]. It seems to me like these two pages should be linked together, at least through a "See also" section. If an admin agrees, please take care of this when you get a chance. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 14:43, 6 June 2022 (UTC)		Through Mike's personal wiki page ([[User:Mike Battaglia]]) just now I discovered the page [[Generalized Tenney Dual Norms and Tp Tuning Space]]. It seems to me like these two pages should be linked together, at least through a "See also" section. If an admin agrees, please take care of this when you get a chance. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 14:43, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

			I'm just posting here as a reminder to admins about this request, in case they all missed it the first time. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 22:58, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

FloraC: FloraC moved page Talk:Generalized Tenney Norms and Tp Interval Space to Talk:Generalized Tenney norms and Tp interval space: WP:NCCAPS

2023-02-13T09:37:40Z

FloraC moved page Talk:Generalized Tenney Norms and Tp Interval Space to Talk:Generalized Tenney norms and Tp interval space: WP:NCCAPS

← Older revision	Revision as of 09:37, 13 February 2023
(No difference)

Cmloegcmluin: /* Adding link to related page */ new section

2022-06-06T14:43:30Z

Adding link to related page: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:43, 6 June 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WSArchiveLink}}		{{WSArchiveLink}}

			== Adding link to related page ==

			Through Mike's personal wiki page ([[User:Mike Battaglia]]) just now I discovered the page [[Generalized Tenney Dual Norms and Tp Tuning Space]]. It seems to me like these two pages should be linked together, at least through a "See also" section. If an admin agrees, please take care of this when you get a chance. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 14:43, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Mike Battaglia: 1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage

2018-10-01T18:02:36Z

1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:02, 1 October 2018
(No difference)

WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia: Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' ''...

2018-10-01T18:01:16Z

Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 1 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =~~		{{WSArchiveLink}}
	~~'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''~~

	~~<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.~~

	~~----~~

	~~== Alternatively? ==~~
	~~You seem to be saying you can embed monzos in a real vector space, or alternatively, in a real vector space.~~

	~~- '''genewardsmith''' August 06, 2012, 09:02:21 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~Fantastic, my post was deleted.~~

	I was trying to say that you can think of interval space as embedding the =free abelian group= of monzos, specifically, as a lattice in some random real vector space. Or, alternatively, if you prefer thinking of monzos in terms of Z-modules and things, then you can get the same construction by just allowing your monzos to take real coefficients.

	The conceptual distinction is more important when talking about vals. For instance, when we construct tuning space are we just allowing our vals to take real coordinates so that we end up with a vector space made up of "real vals"? Or are we embedding the vals into this other vector space that's otherwise made tuning maps, which aren't vals of any kind?

	~~- '''mbattaglia1''' August 06, 2012, 10:13:30 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~Why in hell was your post deleted?~~

	~~I think you are trying to draw a distinction so fine it's confusing.~~

	~~- '''genewardsmith''' August 06, 2012, 10:21:04 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~I think a stray click on my end did it.~~

	~~If you think it's unnecessary, feel free to tweak it or nix it altogether. I spent too many hours on this and now I'm fried.~~

	~~- '''mbattaglia1''' August 06, 2012, 10:56:05 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~

Mike Battaglia: Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' ''...

2018-09-20T07:00:30Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 20 September 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =		= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
	'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''		'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''

			<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.

	----		----

Wikispaces>FREEZE at 00:00, 17 July 2018

2018-07-17T00:00:00Z

New page

= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
----

== Alternatively? ==
You seem to be saying you can embed monzos in a real vector space, or alternatively, in a real vector space.

- '''genewardsmith''' August 06, 2012, 09:02:21 AM UTC-0700
----
Fantastic, my post was deleted.

I was trying to say that you can think of interval space as embedding the =free abelian group= of monzos, specifically, as a lattice in some random real vector space. Or, alternatively, if you prefer thinking of monzos in terms of Z-modules and things, then you can get the same construction by just allowing your monzos to take real coefficients.

The conceptual distinction is more important when talking about vals. For instance, when we construct tuning space are we just allowing our vals to take real coordinates so that we end up with a vector space made up of "real vals"? Or are we embedding the vals into this other vector space that's otherwise made tuning maps, which aren't vals of any kind?

- '''mbattaglia1''' August 06, 2012, 10:13:30 AM UTC-0700
----
Why in hell was your post deleted?

I think you are trying to draw a distinction so fine it's confusing.

- '''genewardsmith''' August 06, 2012, 10:21:04 AM UTC-0700
----
I think a stray click on my end did it.

If you think it's unnecessary, feel free to tweak it or nix it altogether. I spent too many hours on this and now I'm fried.

- '''mbattaglia1''' August 06, 2012, 10:56:05 AM UTC-0700
----