Talk:Familiar melodies in unfamiliar tunings - Revision history

Bozu: /* Bohlen-Pierce */ new section

2020-05-27T19:54:51Z

Bohlen-Pierce: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 27 May 2020
Line 10:		Line 10:

	--[[User:Bozu\|Bozu]] ([[User talk:Bozu\|talk]]) 19:51, 27 May 2020 (UTC)		--[[User:Bozu\|Bozu]] ([[User talk:Bozu\|talk]]) 19:51, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

			== Bohlen-Pierce ==

			I'd love to hear what something like Bouree would sound like in BP! I can imagine it'd be a heck of a lot of effort to make any sense of something with counterpoint in a system without octaves, though.

Bozu: /* 19-edo */ new section

2020-05-27T19:51:41Z

19-edo: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:51, 27 May 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WSArchiveLink}}		{{WSArchiveLink}}

			== 19-edo ==

			I'd argue that 99.9% of all mainstream music can be adapted into 19-edo without any effort whatsoever. The article mentions only 31-edo, but really 31-edo is to 19-edo as 19-edo is to 12-edo.

			That said, I'm not even sure if pieces adapted into 19-edo even vaguely qualify as xenharmonic, although, the same ought to apply to "standard" pieces faithfully adapted into 31-edo, for the same reasons.

			I have a fairly extensive collection of recordings of other people's music I recorded in 19-edo, going back decades - none of it particularly good nor interesting, in my opinion.

			--[[User:Bozu\|Bozu]] ([[User talk:Bozu\|talk]]) 19:51, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Mike Battaglia: 1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage

2018-10-01T18:02:35Z

1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:02, 1 October 2018
(No difference)

WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia: Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' ''...

2018-10-01T18:01:16Z

Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 1 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =~~		{{WSArchiveLink}}
	~~'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''~~

	~~<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.~~

	~~----~~

	~~== One idea I had.... ==~~
	~~There are a lot of pop songs titled "Magic".~~

	~~For instance, "Magic" by the Cars, "Magic" by Pilot, etc. Or even just with the word in their title ("Strange Magic", "Do You Believe In Magic?"), etc.~~

	I'd like to see at least one of these pieces redone in magic temperament. Not just in an edo that allows magic, but actually in magic temperament, meaning chord progressions would more often modulate by major thirds than by fifths. This would necessitate a lot of changes in the chords and melody, but I'm sure there'd be a way to do this while maintaining the overall feel of the original piece.

	~~Actually, "Strange Magic" would be a great one to do. The cover could be called "StrangeR Magic".~~

	~~- '''MasonGreen1''' April 04, 2016, 08:11:45 PM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	There might be some copyright issues with recording covers, though; although I'm not sure how much of a problem that'd be if you weren't making money off the cover. (Alternatively, it might be possible to consider it a parody rather than a cover, and parodies are protected under fair use IIRC). Legal issues are not my strong suit, unfortunately.

	~~- '''MasonGreen1''' April 04, 2016, 08:13:22 PM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~

Mike Battaglia: Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' ''...

2018-09-20T07:00:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 20 September 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =		= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
	'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''		'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''

			<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.

	----		----

Wikispaces>FREEZE at 00:00, 17 July 2018

2018-07-17T00:00:00Z

New page

= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
----

== One idea I had.... ==
There are a lot of pop songs titled "Magic".

For instance, "Magic" by the Cars, "Magic" by Pilot, etc. Or even just with the word in their title ("Strange Magic", "Do You Believe In Magic?"), etc.

I'd like to see at least one of these pieces redone in magic temperament. Not just in an edo that allows magic, but actually in magic temperament, meaning chord progressions would more often modulate by major thirds than by fifths. This would necessitate a lot of changes in the chords and melody, but I'm sure there'd be a way to do this while maintaining the overall feel of the original piece.

Actually, "Strange Magic" would be a great one to do. The cover could be called "StrangeR Magic".

- '''MasonGreen1''' April 04, 2016, 08:11:45 PM UTC-0700
----
There might be some copyright issues with recording covers, though; although I'm not sure how much of a problem that'd be if you weren't making money off the cover. (Alternatively, it might be possible to consider it a parody rather than a cover, and parodies are protected under fair use IIRC). Legal issues are not my strong suit, unfortunately.

- '''MasonGreen1''' April 04, 2016, 08:13:22 PM UTC-0700
----