https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Talk%3AConstant_structure%2FWikispacesArchive 2026-07-09T20:27:45Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.43.6 https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Constant_structure/WikispacesArchive&diff=34572&oldid=prev 2018-10-01T18:01:39Z

<p>1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage</p> <table style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122;" data-mw="interface"> <tr class="diff-title" lang="en"> <td colspan="1" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan="1" style="background-color: #fff; color: #202122; text-align: center;">Revision as of 18:01, 1 October 2018</td> </tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-notice" lang="en"><div class="mw-diff-empty">(No difference)</div> </td></tr></table>

Mike Battaglia https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Talk:Constant_structure/WikispacesArchive&diff=34571&oldid=prev 2018-10-01T18:01:16Z

<p>Text replacement - &quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.&#039;&#039;&#039;&quot; to &quot;&#039;&#039;&#039;All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.&#039;&#039;&#039; &lt;span style=&quot;color:#800000&quot;&gt;&#039;&#039;...</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>{{WSArchiveHeader}}<br /> <br /> <br /> == **to have** v.s **to be** a constant structure ==<br /> the introduction uses &lt;em&gt;to have&lt;/em&gt; which I find better to understand, should we decide for a more consistent terminology for the verb?<br /> <br /> - &#039;&#039;&#039;xenwolf&#039;&#039;&#039; September 04, 2017, 12:15:04 AM UTC-0700<br /> ----<br /> <br /> == Construction of Constant Structures ==<br /> Could some material or resources on -how- to construct these scales be added? It seems to get exponentially harder the more notes you want and the brute force approach isn&#039;t getting me anywhere.<br /> <br /> I&#039;m particularly interested in CS Scales because they seem to be the best option for bringing Just Intonation to isomorphic keyboards.<br /> <br /> - &#039;&#039;&#039;kai.lugheidh&#039;&#039;&#039; March 21, 2017, 07:33:10 PM UTC-0700<br /> ----<br /> I&#039;ve noticed that when constructing regular scales for certain limits in a way that extends the concept of well-formedness – that is, having no more different scale steps than generating primes, and always breaking up any extraneous scale steps in the same way – Scala always reports them as being constant structures. Could I be on to something here?<br /> <br /> - &#039;&#039;&#039;kai.lugheidh&#039;&#039;&#039; June 01, 2017, 08:15:01 PM UTC-0700<br /> ----<br /> <br /> == Density of CS Scales in EDO&#039;s ==<br /> What is the definition of density?<br /> <br /> - &#039;&#039;&#039;xenwolf&#039;&#039;&#039; June 12, 2015, 01:21:15 AM UTC-0700<br /> ----<br /> I guess I was thinking of something akin to this definition, but for scales instead of numbers:<br /> <br /> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_density<br /> <br /> Basically, it is a way to ask the question of &quot;how many CS scales are there compared to non-CS scales?&quot;<br /> <br /> - &#039;&#039;&#039;Sarzadoce&#039;&#039;&#039; June 12, 2015, 09:01:02 PM UTC-0700<br /> ----</div>

WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia