Talk:Ainismic chords - Revision history

FloraC: FloraC moved page Talk:Ainic chords to Talk:Ainismic chords without leaving a redirect: Follow the name change

2023-08-15T17:00:52Z

FloraC moved page Talk:Ainic chords to Talk:Ainismic chords without leaving a redirect: Follow the name change

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:00, 15 August 2023
(No difference)

Aura at 18:59, 1 January 2021

2021-01-01T18:59:15Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 1 January 2021
Line 30:		Line 30:

	Hey, Flora, since I'm starting to find a noticeable degree of asymmetry in the tetrads that are confined to the 17-odd limit, do you think we can divide this type of essentially tempered chord into two classes based on odd limit? You know, something like Ainic I and Ainic II? If this is feasible, then Ainic I chords are those that have a 17-odd limit in all inversions, but it looks like Ainic II chords have something like a 39-odd-limit. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 18:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)		Hey, Flora, since I'm starting to find a noticeable degree of asymmetry in the tetrads that are confined to the 17-odd limit, do you think we can divide this type of essentially tempered chord into two classes based on odd limit? You know, something like Ainic I and Ainic II? If this is feasible, then Ainic I chords are those that have a 17-odd limit in all inversions, but it looks like Ainic II chords have something like a 39-odd-limit. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 18:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

			Hmm, looking at the article on [[Keenanismic chords]], it says more chords exist if you're willing to go to higher odd limits, so perhaps dividing the ainic chords into two classes like this is unnecessary... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 18:59, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Aura at 18:27, 1 January 2021

2021-01-01T18:27:58Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:27, 1 January 2021
Line 27:		Line 27:
	:: @FloraC: since you seem to "see the light" here (for me it was also mostly confusing), wouldn't you be the right person to rework the [[dyadic chord]] article? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC)		:: @FloraC: since you seem to "see the light" here (for me it was also mostly confusing), wouldn't you be the right person to rework the [[dyadic chord]] article? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

	== Different ~~Types~~ of Ainic Chords Based on Odd-Limit ==		== Different Classes of Ainic Chords Based on Odd-Limit ==

	Hey, Flora, since I'm starting to find a noticeable degree of asymmetry in the tetrads that are confined to the 17-odd limit, do you think we can divide this ~~class~~ of essentially tempered ~~chords~~ into two ~~types~~ based on odd limit? You know, something like Ainic I and Ainic II? If this is feasible, then Ainic I chords are those that have a 17-odd limit in all inversions, but it looks like Ainic II chords have something like a 39-odd-limit. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 18:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)		Hey, Flora, since I'm starting to find a noticeable degree of asymmetry in the tetrads that are confined to the 17-odd limit, do you think we can divide this type of essentially tempered chord into two classes based on odd limit? You know, something like Ainic I and Ainic II? If this is feasible, then Ainic I chords are those that have a 17-odd limit in all inversions, but it looks like Ainic II chords have something like a 39-odd-limit. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 18:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Aura at 18:27, 1 January 2021

2021-01-01T18:27:13Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:27, 1 January 2021
Line 29:		Line 29:
	== Different Types of Ainic Chords Based on Odd-Limit ==		== Different Types of Ainic Chords Based on Odd-Limit ==

	Hey, Flora, since I'm starting to find a noticeable degree of asymmetry in the tetrads that are confined to the 17-odd limit, do you think we can divide this class of essentially tempered chords into two ~~classed~~ based on odd limit? You know, something like Ainic I and Ainic II? If this is feasible, then Ainic I chords are those that have a 17-odd limit in all inversions, but it looks like Ainic II chords have something like a 39-odd-limit. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 18:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)		Hey, Flora, since I'm starting to find a noticeable degree of asymmetry in the tetrads that are confined to the 17-odd limit, do you think we can divide this class of essentially tempered chords into two types based on odd limit? You know, something like Ainic I and Ainic II? If this is feasible, then Ainic I chords are those that have a 17-odd limit in all inversions, but it looks like Ainic II chords have something like a 39-odd-limit. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 18:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Aura: /* Different Types of Ainic Chords Based on Odd-Limit */ new section

2021-01-01T18:23:08Z

Different Types of Ainic Chords Based on Odd-Limit: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:23, 1 January 2021
Line 26:		Line 26:

	:: @FloraC: since you seem to "see the light" here (for me it was also mostly confusing), wouldn't you be the right person to rework the [[dyadic chord]] article? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC)		:: @FloraC: since you seem to "see the light" here (for me it was also mostly confusing), wouldn't you be the right person to rework the [[dyadic chord]] article? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

			== Different Types of Ainic Chords Based on Odd-Limit ==

			Hey, Flora, since I'm starting to find a noticeable degree of asymmetry in the tetrads that are confined to the 17-odd limit, do you think we can divide this class of essentially tempered chords into two classed based on odd limit? You know, something like Ainic I and Ainic II? If this is feasible, then Ainic I chords are those that have a 17-odd limit in all inversions, but it looks like Ainic II chords have something like a 39-odd-limit. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 18:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

Xenwolf: /* Essentially Tempered Chords */ re

2020-12-30T12:15:14Z

Essentially Tempered Chords: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:15, 30 December 2020
Line 24:		Line 24:

	: It's confusingly written. Anyway, the problem of your addition was that you didn't notice the notion is based on odd limits (not prime limits), so intervals like 44/39 is not considered "17-limit". [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 06:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)		: It's confusingly written. Anyway, the problem of your addition was that you didn't notice the notion is based on odd limits (not prime limits), so intervals like 44/39 is not considered "17-limit". [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 06:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

			:: @FloraC: since you seem to "see the light" here (for me it was also mostly confusing), wouldn't you be the right person to rework the [[dyadic chord]] article? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:15, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Xenwolf: /* Structure */ re

2020-12-30T12:10:56Z

Structure: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:10, 30 December 2020
Line 14:		Line 14:

	: Sorry about that. I wasn't sure how to style an article like this, and so I figured that I'd mimic the structure of some of the other articles on specific essentially tempered chord types. Apparently that didn't work to well. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 23:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)		: Sorry about that. I wasn't sure how to style an article like this, and so I figured that I'd mimic the structure of some of the other articles on specific essentially tempered chord types. Apparently that didn't work to well. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 23:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

			:: It's much better now with a list. Maybe also the repeating parts could be cut. I also tried to build a table from it which turned out to be not as good as I expected. Maybe there is a better way of presenting chords and steps but I have to admit that this is not easy in wikitext. --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 12:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

	== Essentially Tempered Chords ==		== Essentially Tempered Chords ==

FloraC: /* Essentially Tempered Chords */ re

2020-12-30T06:29:08Z

Essentially Tempered Chords: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:29, 30 December 2020
Line 20:		Line 20:

	I tried reading again, and it still flies over my head. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 06:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)		I tried reading again, and it still flies over my head. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 06:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

			: It's confusingly written. Anyway, the problem of your addition was that you didn't notice the notion is based on odd limits (not prime limits), so intervals like 44/39 is not considered "17-limit". [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 06:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Aura at 06:01, 30 December 2020

2020-12-30T06:01:08Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:01, 30 December 2020
Line 18:		Line 18:

	I have to admit that the definition of "Essentially Tempered Chords" kind of flew over my head when I read it the first time. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:57, 30 December 2020 (UTC)		I have to admit that the definition of "Essentially Tempered Chords" kind of flew over my head when I read it the first time. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:57, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

			I tried reading again, and it still flies over my head. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 06:01, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Aura at 05:57, 30 December 2020

2020-12-30T05:57:40Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:57, 30 December 2020
Line 14:		Line 14:

	: Sorry about that. I wasn't sure how to style an article like this, and so I figured that I'd mimic the structure of some of the other articles on specific essentially tempered chord types. Apparently that didn't work to well. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 23:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)		: Sorry about that. I wasn't sure how to style an article like this, and so I figured that I'd mimic the structure of some of the other articles on specific essentially tempered chord types. Apparently that didn't work to well. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 23:52, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

			== Essentially Tempered Chords ==

			I have to admit that the definition of "Essentially Tempered Chords" kind of flew over my head when I read it the first time. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 05:57, 30 December 2020 (UTC)