Talk:64/63 - Revision history

Lucius Chiaraviglio: /* Naming */ Leipiger Komma removal

2025-06-20T15:21:26Z

Naming: Leipiger Komma removal

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:21, 20 June 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:

	: For German people "Leipziger Komma" would be the easiest name to remember and pronounce. But in a mathematical of functional sense all the names are just noise. 😉 --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 16:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)		: For German people "Leipziger Komma" would be the easiest name to remember and pronounce. But in a mathematical of functional sense all the names are just noise. 😉 --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 16:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

			:: Just did a Google search after [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]]'s removal of "Leipziger Komma" from the list of names, and indeed the only instance of this name that came up was the German Wikipedia article "[https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Komma_(Musik) Komma (Musik)]", and it listed this name but gave no reference (it has no references at all). [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 15:21, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

	== Organization, and the Archytas comma as a musical interval in its own right ==		== Organization, and the Archytas comma as a musical interval in its own right ==

Lucius Chiaraviglio: /* Complete the Sagittal Notation? */ Sagitype needs to be more widely known

2024-10-10T07:21:55Z

Complete the Sagittal Notation?: Sagitype needs to be more widely known

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:21, 10 October 2024
Line 19:		Line 19:

	:: Lucius, thank you for the nudge to improve the documentation. The [[Sagitype]] article should help you with learning how to make {{sagittal \| \|) }} yourself. Please let me know if you still have questions. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 15:39, 9 October 2024 (UTC)		:: Lucius, thank you for the nudge to improve the documentation. The [[Sagitype]] article should help you with learning how to make {{sagittal \| \|) }} yourself. Please let me know if you still have questions. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 15:39, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

			::: Thank you very much -- this is quite helpful. It should be made more widely known. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 07:21, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Cmloegcmluin: /* Complete the Sagittal Notation? */

2024-10-09T15:39:47Z

Complete the Sagittal Notation?

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 9 October 2024
Line 17:		Line 17:

	: Good idea. Done. [[User:Dave Keenan\|Dave Keenan]] ([[User talk:Dave Keenan\|talk]]) 12:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)		: Good idea. Done. [[User:Dave Keenan\|Dave Keenan]] ([[User talk:Dave Keenan\|talk]]) 12:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

			:: Lucius, thank you for the nudge to improve the documentation. The [[Sagitype]] article should help you with learning how to make {{sagittal \| \|) }} yourself. Please let me know if you still have questions. --[[User:Cmloegcmluin\|Cmloegcmluin]] ([[User talk:Cmloegcmluin\|talk]]) 15:39, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Dave Keenan: /* Complete the Sagittal Notation? */ Good idea. Done.

2024-10-09T12:17:00Z

Complete the Sagittal Notation?: Good idea. Done.

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:17, 9 October 2024
Line 15:		Line 15:

	Showing the symbol for Sagittal Notation down by this interval is nice, but it would be good to put the Sagittal Notation up for this interval. Unfortunately, I haven't yet figured out how to reference the right symbol myself. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 07:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)		Showing the symbol for Sagittal Notation down by this interval is nice, but it would be good to put the Sagittal Notation up for this interval. Unfortunately, I haven't yet figured out how to reference the right symbol myself. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 07:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

			: Good idea. Done. [[User:Dave Keenan\|Dave Keenan]] ([[User talk:Dave Keenan\|talk]]) 12:17, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Lucius Chiaraviglio: /* Complete the Sagittal Notation? */ new section

2024-10-09T07:13:32Z

Complete the Sagittal Notation?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:13, 9 October 2024
Line 11:		Line 11:

	: I think I'd have to say that 64/63 could be called either the "Archytas Greater Superprime" or the "Archytas Narrow Inframinor Second" depending on whether it functions as a prime or a second. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)		: I think I'd have to say that 64/63 could be called either the "Archytas Greater Superprime" or the "Archytas Narrow Inframinor Second" depending on whether it functions as a prime or a second. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

			== Complete the Sagittal Notation? ==

			Showing the symbol for Sagittal Notation down by this interval is nice, but it would be good to put the Sagittal Notation up for this interval. Unfortunately, I haven't yet figured out how to reference the right symbol myself. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 07:13, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Aura at 20:30, 30 July 2024

2024-07-30T20:30:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:30, 30 July 2024
Line 10:		Line 10:
	[[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 19:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)		[[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 19:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

	: I think I'd have to say that 64/63 could be called either the "Archytas Superprime" or the "Archytas Narrow Inframinor Second" depending on whether it functions as a prime or a second. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)		: I think I'd have to say that 64/63 could be called either the "Archytas Greater Superprime" or the "Archytas Narrow Inframinor Second" depending on whether it functions as a prime or a second. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Aura at 20:28, 30 July 2024

2024-07-30T20:28:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:28, 30 July 2024
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Instead of saying "On the other hand, if one should be so bold as to treat the Archytas' comma as a musical interval in its own right", it would be better to reorganize this article after the example of the [[128/125\|Diesis]], which has an Approximations section, and following that a Temperaments section which has sub-sections for "As a comma" and "As an interval" (and while we're at it, can we get it a non-comma name?). After all, NOT tempering out the Archytas comma is a requirement for many septimal temperaments to work properly, where tempering it out results in a d (or even dd) val, although in equal divisions of the octave smaller than 44EDO, it will unavoidably be inflated.		Instead of saying "On the other hand, if one should be so bold as to treat the Archytas' comma as a musical interval in its own right", it would be better to reorganize this article after the example of the [[128/125\|Diesis]], which has an Approximations section, and following that a Temperaments section which has sub-sections for "As a comma" and "As an interval" (and while we're at it, can we get it a non-comma name?). After all, NOT tempering out the Archytas comma is a requirement for many septimal temperaments to work properly, where tempering it out results in a d (or even dd) val, although in equal divisions of the octave smaller than 44EDO, it will unavoidably be inflated.
	[[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 19:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)		[[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 19:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

			: I think I'd have to say that 64/63 could be called either the "Archytas Superprime" or the "Archytas Narrow Inframinor Second" depending on whether it functions as a prime or a second. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Lucius Chiaraviglio: /* Organization, and the Archytas comma as a musical interval in its own right */ new section

2024-07-30T19:06:58Z

Organization, and the Archytas comma as a musical interval in its own right: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:06, 30 July 2024
Line 4:		Line 4:

	: For German people "Leipziger Komma" would be the easiest name to remember and pronounce. But in a mathematical of functional sense all the names are just noise. 😉 --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 16:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)		: For German people "Leipziger Komma" would be the easiest name to remember and pronounce. But in a mathematical of functional sense all the names are just noise. 😉 --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 16:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

			== Organization, and the Archytas comma as a musical interval in its own right ==

			Instead of saying "On the other hand, if one should be so bold as to treat the Archytas' comma as a musical interval in its own right", it would be better to reorganize this article after the example of the [[128/125\|Diesis]], which has an Approximations section, and following that a Temperaments section which has sub-sections for "As a comma" and "As an interval" (and while we're at it, can we get it a non-comma name?). After all, NOT tempering out the Archytas comma is a requirement for many septimal temperaments to work properly, where tempering it out results in a d (or even dd) val, although in equal divisions of the octave smaller than 44EDO, it will unavoidably be inflated.
			[[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 19:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Xenwolf: re (added section)

2020-11-27T16:17:54Z

re (added section)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 27 November 2020
Line 1:		Line 1:
			== Naming ==

	Hey, Xenwolf, I don't know about you, but "Archytas' comma" strikes me as a unique name. It's true that I'd prefer 64/63 as title for this article, but still... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 15:48, 27 November 2020 (UTC)		Hey, Xenwolf, I don't know about you, but "Archytas' comma" strikes me as a unique name. It's true that I'd prefer 64/63 as title for this article, but still... --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 15:48, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

			: For German people "Leipziger Komma" would be the easiest name to remember and pronounce. But in a mathematical of functional sense all the names are just noise. 😉 --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 16:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Aura: Created page with "Hey, Xenwolf, I don't know about you, but "Archytas' comma" strikes me as a unique name. It's true that I'd prefer 64/63 as title for this article, but still... --~~~~"

2020-11-27T15:48:14Z

Created page with "Hey, Xenwolf, I don't know about you, but "Archytas' comma" strikes me as a unique name. It's true that I'd prefer 64/63 as title for this article, but still... --~~~~"

New page

Hey, Xenwolf, I don't know about you, but "Archytas' comma" strikes me as a unique name. It's true that I'd prefer 64/63 as title for this article, but still... --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 15:48, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:28, 30 July 2024
Line 9:		Line 9:
	Instead of saying "On the other hand, if one should be so bold as to treat the Archytas' comma as a musical interval in its own right", it would be better to reorganize this article after the example of the [[128/125\|Diesis]], which has an Approximations section, and following that a Temperaments section which has sub-sections for "As a comma" and "As an interval" (and while we're at it, can we get it a non-comma name?). After all, NOT tempering out the Archytas comma is a requirement for many septimal temperaments to work properly, where tempering it out results in a d (or even dd) val, although in equal divisions of the octave smaller than 44EDO, it will unavoidably be inflated.		Instead of saying "On the other hand, if one should be so bold as to treat the Archytas' comma as a musical interval in its own right", it would be better to reorganize this article after the example of the [[128/125\|Diesis]], which has an Approximations section, and following that a Temperaments section which has sub-sections for "As a comma" and "As an interval" (and while we're at it, can we get it a non-comma name?). After all, NOT tempering out the Archytas comma is a requirement for many septimal temperaments to work properly, where tempering it out results in a d (or even dd) val, although in equal divisions of the octave smaller than 44EDO, it will unavoidably be inflated.
	[[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 19:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)		[[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 19:06, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

			: I think I'd have to say that 64/63 could be called either the "Archytas Superprime" or the "Archytas Narrow Inframinor Second" depending on whether it functions as a prime or a second. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 20:28, 30 July 2024 (UTC)