Talk:5L 2s - Revision history

Overthink: link fix

2026-01-17T19:58:46Z

link fix

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:58, 17 January 2026
Line 14:		Line 14:
	: Aren't they already named so? —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:49, 17 January 2026 (UTC)		: Aren't they already named so? —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:49, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

	:: Seems like we're most of the way there, but not quite. In [[7L 12s]] it says "Temperaments associated with this scale include [[flattone]], as the flattone enharmonic scale" (basically there but for lack of the abbreviation). In [12L 7s]] it says "Essentially the entire range of this scale is spanned by various tunings of [[meantone]], as the meantone enharmonic scale" (again basically there but for lack of the abbreviation). In [[12L 5s]] the closest thing I can find is "Temperaments supported by this scale include those under the Pythagorean and schismic families" (nothing exactly homologous to the previous ones). In [[5L 12s]] I do not see any equivalent phrase. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 11:25, 17 January 2026 (UTC)		:: Seems like we're most of the way there, but not quite. In [[7L 12s]] it says "Temperaments associated with this scale include [[flattone]], as the flattone enharmonic scale" (basically there but for lack of the abbreviation). In [[12L 7s]] it says "Essentially the entire range of this scale is spanned by various tunings of [[meantone]], as the meantone enharmonic scale" (again basically there but for lack of the abbreviation). In [[12L 5s]] the closest thing I can find is "Temperaments supported by this scale include those under the Pythagorean and schismic families" (nothing exactly homologous to the previous ones). In [[5L 12s]] I do not see any equivalent phrase. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 11:25, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Lucius Chiaraviglio: /* Enharmonic scales */ Naming so far

2026-01-17T11:25:14Z

Enharmonic scales: Naming so far

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:25, 17 January 2026
Line 13:		Line 13:

	: Aren't they already named so? —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:49, 17 January 2026 (UTC)		: Aren't they already named so? —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:49, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

			:: Seems like we're most of the way there, but not quite. In [[7L 12s]] it says "Temperaments associated with this scale include [[flattone]], as the flattone enharmonic scale" (basically there but for lack of the abbreviation). In [12L 7s]] it says "Essentially the entire range of this scale is spanned by various tunings of [[meantone]], as the meantone enharmonic scale" (again basically there but for lack of the abbreviation). In [[12L 5s]] the closest thing I can find is "Temperaments supported by this scale include those under the Pythagorean and schismic families" (nothing exactly homologous to the previous ones). In [[5L 12s]] I do not see any equivalent phrase. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 11:25, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

FloraC: /* Enharmonic scales */ re

2026-01-17T10:49:01Z

Enharmonic scales: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:49, 17 January 2026
Line 11:		Line 11:

	There should probably be a name for enharmonic scales. There are actually ''four'' possible enharmonic scales which derive from diatonic, these being [[7L 12s]], [[12L 7s]], [[12L 5s]], and [[5L 12s]]. I believe they should be called ''f''-enharmonic (f for [[flattone]]), ''m''-enharmonic (m for [[meantone]]), ''p''-enharmonic (p for [[Pythagorean tuning\|Pythagorean]]), and ''s''-enharmonic (s for [[superpyth]]), respectively.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 05:49, 17 January 2026 (UTC)		There should probably be a name for enharmonic scales. There are actually ''four'' possible enharmonic scales which derive from diatonic, these being [[7L 12s]], [[12L 7s]], [[12L 5s]], and [[5L 12s]]. I believe they should be called ''f''-enharmonic (f for [[flattone]]), ''m''-enharmonic (m for [[meantone]]), ''p''-enharmonic (p for [[Pythagorean tuning\|Pythagorean]]), and ''s''-enharmonic (s for [[superpyth]]), respectively.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 05:49, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

			: Aren't they already named so? —[[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 10:49, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Overthink: /* Enharmonic scales */ new section

2026-01-17T05:49:07Z

Enharmonic scales: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:49, 17 January 2026
Line 7:		Line 7:
	This page gives several instances of the error "Lua error in Module:MOS_tunings at line 304: attempt to call field 'parse_search_args' (a nil value)". Anybody know how to fix this? [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 13:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)		This page gives several instances of the error "Lua error in Module:MOS_tunings at line 304: attempt to call field 'parse_search_args' (a nil value)". Anybody know how to fix this? [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 13:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
	: Strange -- it seems to have fixed itself now. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 22:42, 22 December 2024 (UTC)		: Strange -- it seems to have fixed itself now. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 22:42, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

			== Enharmonic scales ==

			There should probably be a name for enharmonic scales. There are actually ''four'' possible enharmonic scales which derive from diatonic, these being [[7L 12s]], [[12L 7s]], [[12L 5s]], and [[5L 12s]]. I believe they should be called ''f''-enharmonic (f for [[flattone]]), ''m''-enharmonic (m for [[meantone]]), ''p''-enharmonic (p for [[Pythagorean tuning\|Pythagorean]]), and ''s''-enharmonic (s for [[superpyth]]), respectively.--[[User:Overthink\|Overthink]] ([[User talk:Overthink\|talk]]) 05:49, 17 January 2026 (UTC)

Lucius Chiaraviglio: /* Broken Page Element */ Fixed itself?

2024-12-22T22:42:53Z

Broken Page Element: Fixed itself?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:42, 22 December 2024
Line 6:		Line 6:

	This page gives several instances of the error "Lua error in Module:MOS_tunings at line 304: attempt to call field 'parse_search_args' (a nil value)". Anybody know how to fix this? [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 13:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)		This page gives several instances of the error "Lua error in Module:MOS_tunings at line 304: attempt to call field 'parse_search_args' (a nil value)". Anybody know how to fix this? [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 13:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)
			: Strange -- it seems to have fixed itself now. [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 22:42, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Lucius Chiaraviglio: Lua error in Module:MOS_tunings at line 304: attempt to call field 'parse_search_args' (a nil value)

2024-12-22T13:52:51Z

Lua error in Module:MOS_tunings at line 304: attempt to call field 'parse_search_args' (a nil value)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:52, 22 December 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:

	While I think it's safe to say that this page pretty well covers the Diatonic MOSes, I think we should link this page to a related page cataloging some of the more noteworthy muddles that are also called diatonic. After all, it would be great to see what EDOs support these just as is the case for Diatonic MOSes. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 00:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)		While I think it's safe to say that this page pretty well covers the Diatonic MOSes, I think we should link this page to a related page cataloging some of the more noteworthy muddles that are also called diatonic. After all, it would be great to see what EDOs support these just as is the case for Diatonic MOSes. --[[User:Aura\|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura\|talk]]) 00:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

			== Broken Page Element ==

			This page gives several instances of the error "Lua error in Module:MOS_tunings at line 304: attempt to call field 'parse_search_args' (a nil value)". Anybody know how to fix this? [[User:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|Lucius Chiaraviglio]] ([[User talk:Lucius Chiaraviglio\|talk]]) 13:52, 22 December 2024 (UTC)

Aura: /* Related Muddles */ new section

2021-03-23T00:41:43Z

Related Muddles: new section

New page

== Related Muddles ==

While I think it's safe to say that this page pretty well covers the Diatonic MOSes, I think we should link this page to a related page cataloging some of the more noteworthy muddles that are also called diatonic. After all, it would be great to see what EDOs support these just as is the case for Diatonic MOSes. --[[User:Aura|Aura]] ([[User talk:Aura|talk]]) 00:41, 23 March 2021 (UTC)