Talk:34edo - Revision history

Francium: /* Who composed Ascension? */ re

2023-05-21T07:22:24Z

Who composed Ascension?: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:22, 21 May 2023
Line 11:		Line 11:

	: heraclitus3125 is [[Peter Kosmorsky]]'s username on the Internet Archive, there are several other music links on the wiki that make it clear. I also believe that [[User:Spt3125]] is the corresponding wiki user, seeing that they did not seem to deny the fact in a discussion on [[User talk:Spt3125]] (although it isn't as explicit). --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 21:17, 20 May 2023 (UTC)		: heraclitus3125 is [[Peter Kosmorsky]]'s username on the Internet Archive, there are several other music links on the wiki that make it clear. I also believe that [[User:Spt3125]] is the corresponding wiki user, seeing that they did not seem to deny the fact in a discussion on [[User talk:Spt3125]] (although it isn't as explicit). --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 21:17, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

			:: Thank you very much :) I've changed the name of the composer. --[[User:Francium\|Francium]] ([[User talk:Francium\|talk]]) 07:22, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Fredg999: /* Who composed Ascension? */ re

2023-05-20T21:17:05Z

Who composed Ascension?: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:17, 20 May 2023
Line 9:		Line 9:

	While sorting the list I have noticed that there was this piece without naming a composer. So I clicked on the link which still worked to find out more about the composer. I only found out that the composer named themselves heraclitus3125. Who is this person? Can someone find out more and add this information if possible? --[[User:Francium\|Francium]] ([[User talk:Francium\|talk]]) 10:06, 20 May 2023 (UTC)		While sorting the list I have noticed that there was this piece without naming a composer. So I clicked on the link which still worked to find out more about the composer. I only found out that the composer named themselves heraclitus3125. Who is this person? Can someone find out more and add this information if possible? --[[User:Francium\|Francium]] ([[User talk:Francium\|talk]]) 10:06, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

			: heraclitus3125 is [[Peter Kosmorsky]]'s username on the Internet Archive, there are several other music links on the wiki that make it clear. I also believe that [[User:Spt3125]] is the corresponding wiki user, seeing that they did not seem to deny the fact in a discussion on [[User talk:Spt3125]] (although it isn't as explicit). --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 21:17, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Francium: /* Who composed Ascension? */

2023-05-20T10:06:07Z

Who composed Ascension?

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:06, 20 May 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:
	== Who composed Ascension? ==		== Who composed Ascension? ==

	While sorting the list I have noticed that there was this piece without naming a composer. So I clicked on the link which still worked to find out more about the composer. I only found out that the composer named themselves heraclitus3125. Who is this person? Can someone find out more and add this information if possible?		While sorting the list I have noticed that there was this piece without naming a composer. So I clicked on the link which still worked to find out more about the composer. I only found out that the composer named themselves heraclitus3125. Who is this person? Can someone find out more and add this information if possible? --[[User:Francium\|Francium]] ([[User talk:Francium\|talk]]) 10:06, 20 May 2023 (UTC)

Francium: /* Who composed Ascension? */ new section

2023-05-20T10:05:37Z

Who composed Ascension?: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:05, 20 May 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:

	: I put the section in question under the heading "Kosmorsky's thoughts". [[User:Inthar\|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar\|talk]]) 02:48, 6 May 2021 (UTC)		: I put the section in question under the heading "Kosmorsky's thoughts". [[User:Inthar\|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar\|talk]]) 02:48, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

			== Who composed Ascension? ==

			While sorting the list I have noticed that there was this piece without naming a composer. So I clicked on the link which still worked to find out more about the composer. I only found out that the composer named themselves heraclitus3125. Who is this person? Can someone find out more and add this information if possible?

Inthar: /* The "notations" paragraph */

2021-05-06T02:48:30Z

The "notations" paragraph

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:48, 6 May 2021
Line 3:		Line 3:

	This sounds more like someone thinking out loud than a carefully made proposal for a notation system. Now that we have ups and downs as the wiki standard, could this be cleaned up or removed? [[User:Inthar\|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar\|talk]]) 04:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)		This sounds more like someone thinking out loud than a carefully made proposal for a notation system. Now that we have ups and downs as the wiki standard, could this be cleaned up or removed? [[User:Inthar\|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar\|talk]]) 04:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

			: I put the section in question under the heading "Kosmorsky's thoughts". [[User:Inthar\|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar\|talk]]) 02:48, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Inthar at 04:08, 21 April 2021

2021-04-21T04:08:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:08, 21 April 2021
Line 2:		Line 2:
	"The chain of fifths gives you the seven naturals, and their sharps and flats. The sharp or flat of a note is (what is commonly called) a neutral second away – the double-sharp means a minor third away from the natural. This has led certain "complainers", in seeking to notate 17 edo, to create an extra character to raise something a small step of which. To render this symbol philosophically harmonious with 34 tone equal temperament, a symbol indicating an adjustment of 1/34 up or down serves the purpose by using two of it, doubled laterally or vertically as composer. This however emphasizes certain aspects of 34edo which may not be most efficient expressions of some musical purposes. Users can construct their own notation to the needs of the music and performer. As an example, a system with 15 "nominals" like A, B, C … F, instead of seven, might be waste – of paper, or space, or memory if they aren't used consecutively frequently. The system spelled out here has familiarity as an advantage and disadvantage. The spacing of the nominals and lines is the same. Dense chords of certain types would be very impossible to notate. Finally, the table uses ^ and v for "up" and "down", but these might be reserved for adjustments of 1/68th of an octave, being hollow, and filled in triangles are recommended. "		"The chain of fifths gives you the seven naturals, and their sharps and flats. The sharp or flat of a note is (what is commonly called) a neutral second away – the double-sharp means a minor third away from the natural. This has led certain "complainers", in seeking to notate 17 edo, to create an extra character to raise something a small step of which. To render this symbol philosophically harmonious with 34 tone equal temperament, a symbol indicating an adjustment of 1/34 up or down serves the purpose by using two of it, doubled laterally or vertically as composer. This however emphasizes certain aspects of 34edo which may not be most efficient expressions of some musical purposes. Users can construct their own notation to the needs of the music and performer. As an example, a system with 15 "nominals" like A, B, C … F, instead of seven, might be waste – of paper, or space, or memory if they aren't used consecutively frequently. The system spelled out here has familiarity as an advantage and disadvantage. The spacing of the nominals and lines is the same. Dense chords of certain types would be very impossible to notate. Finally, the table uses ^ and v for "up" and "down", but these might be reserved for adjustments of 1/68th of an octave, being hollow, and filled in triangles are recommended. "

	This sounds more like someone thinking out loud than a carefully made proposal for a notation system. Now that we have ups and downs, could this be cleaned up or removed? [[User:Inthar\|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar\|talk]]) 04:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)		This sounds more like someone thinking out loud than a carefully made proposal for a notation system. Now that we have ups and downs as the wiki standard, could this be cleaned up or removed? [[User:Inthar\|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar\|talk]]) 04:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Inthar: Created page with "== The "notations" paragraph == "The chain of fifths gives you the seven naturals, and their sharps and flats. The sharp or flat of a note is (what is commonly called) a neutr..."

2021-04-21T04:04:02Z

Created page with "== The "notations" paragraph == "The chain of fifths gives you the seven naturals, and their sharps and flats. The sharp or flat of a note is (what is commonly called) a neutr..."

New page

== The "notations" paragraph ==
"The chain of fifths gives you the seven naturals, and their sharps and flats. The sharp or flat of a note is (what is commonly called) a neutral second away – the double-sharp means a minor third away from the natural. This has led certain "complainers", in seeking to notate 17 edo, to create an extra character to raise something a small step of which. To render this symbol philosophically harmonious with 34 tone equal temperament, a symbol indicating an adjustment of 1/34 up or down serves the purpose by using two of it, doubled laterally or vertically as composer. This however emphasizes certain aspects of 34edo which may not be most efficient expressions of some musical purposes. Users can construct their own notation to the needs of the music and performer. As an example, a system with 15 "nominals" like A, B, C … F, instead of seven, might be waste – of paper, or space, or memory if they aren't used consecutively frequently. The system spelled out here has familiarity as an advantage and disadvantage. The spacing of the nominals and lines is the same. Dense chords of certain types would be very impossible to notate. Finally, the table uses ^ and v for "up" and "down", but these might be reserved for adjustments of 1/68th of an octave, being hollow, and filled in triangles are recommended. "

This sounds more like someone thinking out loud than a carefully made proposal for a notation system. Now that we have ups and downs, could this be cleaned up or removed? [[User:Inthar|Inthar]] ([[User talk:Inthar|talk]]) 04:04, 21 April 2021 (UTC)