Talk:29edo - Revision history

FloraC: re

2023-03-09T07:48:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:48, 9 March 2023
Line 32:		Line 32:

	::: Also note how it isn't a coincidence that the approximation of logarithmic phi in [[34edo]] is 21/34 octaves. :) --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 03:00, 9 March 2023 (UTC)		::: Also note how it isn't a coincidence that the approximation of logarithmic phi in [[34edo]] is 21/34 octaves. :) --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 03:00, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

			:::: Well, other acoustic quadratic roots are just like acoustic phi and have associated rational series. For the same reason we might find logarithmic quadratic roots relevant, too. I've also heard that acoustic e is the limit of something. I think we can agree that pi, either acoustic or logarithmic, is irrelevant. [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 07:48, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Godtone: /* Logarithmic mathematical constants vs acoustic mathematical constants */

2023-03-09T03:00:59Z

Logarithmic mathematical constants vs acoustic mathematical constants

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:00, 9 March 2023
Line 30:		Line 30:

	::: I'm of the opinion that there is no such thing as accoustic pi or accoustic any irrational number. However, I think accoustic phi exists as a series of rational numbers that build on themselves recursively and naturally (5:8:13:21:34:55:...) and therefore it has potential importance sonically. However, I disagree with the notion that logarithmic phi is irrelevant. Phi is important because it is the most efficient number for escaping rational approximations, therefore it generates a progression of smooth recursively nested/interrelated structures; MOSSes (Moment Of Symmetry Scales) specifically. (Scales generated by 741.6407865c.) Note that this concept works for any period, so you could do the same thing but interpreting phi (~1.618 or ~-0.618; both are equivalent under period-equivalence) as describing an amount of tritaves, or fifths, etc. It is interesting to me that, for example, [[34edo]] approximates logarithmic phi, as it is a great system non-meantone system. Similarly you can use phi in yet other ways like in the case of [[golden meantone]], which highlights [[31edo]] as especially interesting as a great meantone system. --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 02:52, 9 March 2023 (UTC)		::: I'm of the opinion that there is no such thing as accoustic pi or accoustic any irrational number. However, I think accoustic phi exists as a series of rational numbers that build on themselves recursively and naturally (5:8:13:21:34:55:...) and therefore it has potential importance sonically. However, I disagree with the notion that logarithmic phi is irrelevant. Phi is important because it is the most efficient number for escaping rational approximations, therefore it generates a progression of smooth recursively nested/interrelated structures; MOSSes (Moment Of Symmetry Scales) specifically. (Scales generated by 741.6407865c.) Note that this concept works for any period, so you could do the same thing but interpreting phi (~1.618 or ~-0.618; both are equivalent under period-equivalence) as describing an amount of tritaves, or fifths, etc. It is interesting to me that, for example, [[34edo]] approximates logarithmic phi, as it is a great system non-meantone system. Similarly you can use phi in yet other ways like in the case of [[golden meantone]], which highlights [[31edo]] as especially interesting as a great meantone system. --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 02:52, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

			::: Also note how it isn't a coincidence that the approximation of logarithmic phi in [[34edo]] is 21/34 octaves. :) --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 03:00, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Godtone: /* Logarithmic mathematical constants vs acoustic mathematical constants */

2023-03-09T02:52:21Z

Logarithmic mathematical constants vs acoustic mathematical constants

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 9 March 2023
Line 28:		Line 28:

	:: --[[User:Contribution\|Contribution]] ([[User talk:Contribution\|talk]]) 16:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)		:: --[[User:Contribution\|Contribution]] ([[User talk:Contribution\|talk]]) 16:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

			::: I'm of the opinion that there is no such thing as accoustic pi or accoustic any irrational number. However, I think accoustic phi exists as a series of rational numbers that build on themselves recursively and naturally (5:8:13:21:34:55:...) and therefore it has potential importance sonically. However, I disagree with the notion that logarithmic phi is irrelevant. Phi is important because it is the most efficient number for escaping rational approximations, therefore it generates a progression of smooth recursively nested/interrelated structures; MOSSes (Moment Of Symmetry Scales) specifically. (Scales generated by 741.6407865c.) Note that this concept works for any period, so you could do the same thing but interpreting phi (~1.618 or ~-0.618; both are equivalent under period-equivalence) as describing an amount of tritaves, or fifths, etc. It is interesting to me that, for example, [[34edo]] approximates logarithmic phi, as it is a great system non-meantone system. Similarly you can use phi in yet other ways like in the case of [[golden meantone]], which highlights [[31edo]] as especially interesting as a great meantone system. --[[User:Godtone\|Godtone]] ([[User talk:Godtone\|talk]]) 02:52, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Contribution at 16:51, 7 March 2023

2023-03-07T16:51:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:51, 7 March 2023
Line 24:		Line 24:

	: [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 13:30, 7 March 2023 (UTC)		: [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 13:30, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

			:: Yes, that's why I attempted to delete what I wrote on the 29edo article.

			:: --[[User:Contribution\|Contribution]] ([[User talk:Contribution\|talk]]) 16:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Contribution: /* Logarithmic mathematical constants vs acoustic mathematical constants */

2023-03-07T15:51:50Z

Logarithmic mathematical constants vs acoustic mathematical constants

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 7 March 2023
Line 16:		Line 16:

	Acoustic constants are the only real musical ones.		Acoustic constants are the only real musical ones.

			--[[User:Contribution\|Contribution]] ([[User talk:Contribution\|talk]]) 15:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

	: I agree they are not of much harmonic value, but you seem to be the one who added them yourself.		: I agree they are not of much harmonic value, but you seem to be the one who added them yourself.

FloraC: re

2023-03-07T13:30:39Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:30, 7 March 2023
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Same thing for logarithmic pi, the number that comes to our ears is 2**(pi) = 8.825		Same thing for logarithmic pi, the number that comes to our ears is 2**(pi) = 8.825


	While these intervals can still be used in a way or another as useful tones in a piece of music, they don't correspond to anything.		While these intervals can still be used in a way or another as useful tones in a piece of music, they don't correspond to anything.


	Moreover, music is fundamentally the art of numbers made audible. This is something that was already known in antiquity. That's why I believe that what is completely outside the "grid of numbers" and the "harmonic grids" that emerge from it does not truly correspond to what music is fundamentally nor to the actual functioning of hearing (for this reason, I believe that most of what was composed in the Second Viennese School does not truly correspond to what music is deeply about, although it is interesting to analyse intellectually).		Moreover, music is fundamentally the art of numbers made audible. This is something that was already known in antiquity. That's why I believe that what is completely outside the "grid of numbers" and the "harmonic grids" that emerge from it does not truly correspond to what music is fundamentally nor to the actual functioning of hearing (for this reason, I believe that most of what was composed in the Second Viennese School does not truly correspond to what music is deeply about, although it is interesting to analyse intellectually).


	This is why I say that logarithmic phi and pi are not musical.		This is why I say that logarithmic phi and pi are not musical.


	When it comes to acoustic constants, we are truly hearing the mathematical constants phi = 1.6180 and pi = 3.1416		When it comes to acoustic constants, we are truly hearing the mathematical constants phi = 1.6180 and pi = 3.1416

	Acoustic constants are the only real musical ones.		Acoustic constants are the only real musical ones.

			: I agree they are not of much harmonic value, but you seem to be the one who added them yourself.

			: Plz remember to sign your talk by leaving four tildes.

			: [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 13:30, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

Contribution: /* Logarithmic mathematical constants vs acoustic mathematical constants */

2023-03-07T10:31:14Z

Logarithmic mathematical constants vs acoustic mathematical constants

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:31, 7 March 2023
Line 19:		Line 19:
	When it comes to acoustic constants, we are truly hearing the mathematical constants phi = 1.6180 and pi = 3.1416		When it comes to acoustic constants, we are truly hearing the mathematical constants phi = 1.6180 and pi = 3.1416

	Acoustic constants are the only "musical ones".		Acoustic constants are the only real musical ones.

Contribution: /* Logarithmic mathematical constants vs acoustic mathematical constants */

2023-03-07T10:27:34Z

Logarithmic mathematical constants vs acoustic mathematical constants

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:27, 7 March 2023
Line 10:		Line 10:
	While these intervals can still be used in a way or another as useful tones in a piece of music, they don't correspond to anything.		While these intervals can still be used in a way or another as useful tones in a piece of music, they don't correspond to anything.

	Moreover, music is fundamentally the art of numbers made audible. This is something that was already known in antiquity. That's why I believe that what is completely outside the "grid of numbers" and the "harmonic grids" that emerge from it does not truly correspond to what music is fundamentally nor to the actual functioning of hearing.
	~~For example, and~~ for this reason, I believe that most of what was composed in the Second Viennese School does not truly correspond to what music is deeply about, although it is interesting to analyse intellectually.		Moreover, music is fundamentally the art of numbers made audible. This is something that was already known in antiquity. That's why I believe that what is completely outside the "grid of numbers" and the "harmonic grids" that emerge from it does not truly correspond to what music is fundamentally nor to the actual functioning of hearing (for this reason, I believe that most of what was composed in the Second Viennese School does not truly correspond to what music is deeply about, although it is interesting to analyse intellectually).


	This is why I say that logarithmic phi and pi are not musical.		This is why I say that logarithmic phi and pi are not musical.

Contribution: /* Logarithmic mathematical constants vs acoustic mathematical constants */

2023-03-07T10:25:16Z

Logarithmic mathematical constants vs acoustic mathematical constants

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:25, 7 March 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:


	While these intervals can still be used in a way or another in a ~~musical context~~, they don't correspond to anything.		While these intervals can still be used in a way or another as useful tones in a piece of music, they don't correspond to anything.

			Moreover, music is fundamentally the art of numbers made audible. This is something that was already known in antiquity. That's why I believe that what is completely outside the "grid of numbers" and the "harmonic grids" that emerge from it does not truly correspond to what music is fundamentally nor to the actual functioning of hearing.
			For example, and for this reason, I believe that most of what was composed in the Second Viennese School does not truly correspond to what music is deeply about, although it is interesting to analyse intellectually.

	When it comes to acoustic constants, we are truly hearing the ~~numbers~~ phi = 1.6180 and pi = 3.1416		This is why I say that logarithmic phi and pi are not musical.


			When it comes to acoustic constants, we are truly hearing the mathematical constants phi = 1.6180 and pi = 3.1416

			Acoustic constants are the only "musical ones".

Contribution: /* Logarithmic mathematical constants vs acoustic mathematical constants */

2023-03-07T09:21:16Z

Logarithmic mathematical constants vs acoustic mathematical constants

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:21, 7 March 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	When we are hearing logarithmic phi, we are in fact hearing the number 2**(phi) = 3.070		When we are hearing logarithmic phi, we are in fact hearing the number 2**(phi) = 3.070

	Same thing for logarithmic pi, the number that comes to our ~~hears~~ is 2**(pi) = 8.825		Same thing for logarithmic pi, the number that comes to our ears is 2**(pi) = 8.825