Talk:218edo - Revision history

PiotrGrochowski at 15:23, 4 October 2018

2018-10-04T15:23:35Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:23, 4 October 2018
Line 117:		Line 117:
	What do you think about tables like this?		What do you think about tables like this?
	--[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 11:17, 2 October 2018 (UTC)		--[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 11:17, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

			:The problem is that they're incorrect. The match for 9/8 is 38 steps, not 37. 9/4 needs to be able to split in half to exist in patent val. [[User:PiotrGrochowski\|PiotrGrochowski]] ([[User talk:PiotrGrochowski\|talk]]) 15:23, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Xenwolf: /* Suggested Table Replacement */ upd

2018-10-02T11:18:37Z

Suggested Table Replacement: upd

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:18, 2 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Suggested Table Replacement ==		== Suggested Table Replacement ==
	I suggest to replace the table by an expanded version, that not only contains the intervals mentioned in the synopsis but also actual error values (relative in % of the step size and absolute in [[cent]]s) ~~as well~~:		I suggest to replace the table by an expanded version, that not only contains the intervals mentioned in the synopsis but also actual error values (relative in % of the step size and absolute in [[cent]]s):

	{\| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: right"		{\| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: right"

Xenwolf: /* Suggested Table Replacement */ update

2018-10-02T11:17:41Z

Suggested Table Replacement: update

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:17, 2 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Suggested Table Replacement ==		== Suggested Table Replacement ==
			I suggest to replace the table by an expanded version, that not only contains the intervals mentioned in the synopsis but also actual error values (relative in % of the step size and absolute in [[cent]]s) as well:
	I suggest to replace the table by an expanded version, that contains the intervals mentioned in the synopsis ~~and the~~ error values (absolute in [[cent]]s~~, relative in percent of the step size~~) as well~~. Here is a preview.~~

	{\| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: right"		{\| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: right"
Line 114:		Line 113:
	\|}		\|}

	~~Hopefully, the~~ sort function ~~dosn't get confused by~~ combined cells.		The sort function splits combined cells if invoked once.

	What do you think about tables like this?		What do you think about tables like this?
	--[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 09:57, 2 October 2018 (UTC)		--[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 11:17, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Xenwolf: added bold to good approximations

2018-10-02T09:57:46Z

added bold to good approximations

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:57, 2 October 2018
Line 73:		Line 73:
	\| 180.95634968557590488616982043875		\| 180.95634968557590488616982043875
	\|-		\|-
	\| style="text-align: center" \| [[9/7]]		\| style="text-align: center" \| '''[[9/7]]'''
	\| 79		\| '''79'''
	\| rowspan="2" \| 4		\| rowspan="2" \| 4
	\| rowspan="2" \| 0.222		\| rowspan="2" \| 0.222
	\| 79.040277305866399691480868404709		\| 79.040277305866399691480868404709
	\|-		\|-
	\| style="text-align: center" \| [[14/9]]		\| style="text-align: center" \| '''[[14/9]]'''
	\| 139		\| '''139'''
	\| 138.95972269413360030851913159529		\| 138.95972269413360030851913159529
	\|-		\|-
Line 93:		Line 93:
	\| 117.84390713706919814853885581378		\| 117.84390713706919814853885581378
	\|-		\|-
	\| style="text-align: center" \| [[11/10]]		\| style="text-align: center" \| '''[[11/10]]'''
	\| 30		\| '''30'''
	\| rowspan="2" \| 2		\| rowspan="2" \| 2
	\| rowspan="2" \| 0.133		\| rowspan="2" \| 0.133
	\| 29.975768177485810015731508557536		\| 29.975768177485810015731508557536
	\|-		\|-
	\| style="text-align: center" \| [[20/11]]		\| style="text-align: center" \| '''[[20/11]]'''
	\| 188		\| '''188'''
	\| 188.02423182251418998426849144246		\| 188.02423182251418998426849144246
	\|-		\|-
	\| style="text-align: center" \| [[17/16]]		\| style="text-align: center" \| '''[[17/16]]'''
	\| 19		\| '''19'''
	\| rowspan="2" \| 7		\| rowspan="2" \| 7
	\| rowspan="2" \| 0.368		\| rowspan="2" \| 0.368
	\| 19.066899392573990999386390356668		\| 19.066899392573990999386390356668
	\|-		\|-
	\| style="text-align: center" \| [[32/17]]		\| style="text-align: center" \| '''[[32/17]]'''
	\| 199		\| '''199'''
	\| 198.93310060742600900061360964333		\| 198.93310060742600900061360964333
	\|}		\|}
Line 116:		Line 116:
	Hopefully, the sort function dosn't get confused by combined cells.		Hopefully, the sort function dosn't get confused by combined cells.

	What do you think about tables like this? --[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 09:52, 2 October 2018 (UTC)		What do you think about tables like this?
			--[[User:Xenwolf\|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf\|talk]]) 09:57, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Xenwolf: /* Suggested Table Replacement */ new section

2018-10-02T09:52:49Z

Suggested Table Replacement: new section

New page

== Suggested Table Replacement ==

I suggest to replace the table by an expanded version, that contains the intervals mentioned in the synopsis and the error values (absolute in [[cent]]s, relative in percent of the step size) as well. Here is a preview.

{| class="wikitable sortable" style="text-align: right"
|-
! rowspan="2" class="unsortable" | Interval
! rowspan="2" | Steps
! colspan="2" | Delta
! rowspan="2" | 218 × log<sub>2</sub> Interval
|-
! rel (%)
! abs ([[Cent|¢]])
|-
| style="text-align: center" | [[3/2]]
| 128
| rowspan="2" | 48
| rowspan="2" | 2.632
| 127.52182515721204755691508978062
|-
| style="text-align: center" | [[4/3]]
| 90
| 90.478174842787952443084910219376
|-
| style="text-align: center" | [[5/4]]
| 70
| rowspan="2" | 18
| rowspan="2" | 0.993
| 70.180324685444991835729635628687
|-
| style="text-align: center" | [[8/5]]
| 148
| 147.81967531455500816427036437131
|-
| style="text-align: center" | [[5/3]]
| 161
| rowspan="2" | 34
| rowspan="2" | 1.880
| 160.65849952823294427881454584806
|-
| style="text-align: center" | [[6/5]]
| 57
| 57.341500471767055721185454151937
|-
| style="text-align: center" | '''[[7/4]]'''
| '''176'''
| rowspan="2" | 0
| rowspan="2" | 0.019
| 176.00337300855769542234931115654
|-
| style="text-align: center" | '''[[8/7]]'''
| '''42'''
| 41.996626991442304577650688843461
|-
| style="text-align: center" | [[10/9]]
| 33
| rowspan="2" | 14
| rowspan="2" | 0.752
| 33.136674371020896721899456067439
|-
| style="text-align: center" | [[9/5]]
| 185
| 184.86332562897910327810054393256
|-
| style="text-align: center" | '''[[9/8]]'''
| '''37'''
| rowspan="2" | 4
| rowspan="2" | 0.240
| 37.043650314424095113830179561248
|-
| style="text-align: center" | '''[[16/9]]'''
| '''181'''
| 180.95634968557590488616982043875
|-
| style="text-align: center" | [[9/7]]
| 79
| rowspan="2" | 4
| rowspan="2" | 0.222
| 79.040277305866399691480868404709
|-
| style="text-align: center" | [[14/9]]
| 139
| 138.95972269413360030851913159529
|-
| style="text-align: center" | [[11/8]]
| 100
| rowspan="2" | 16
| rowspan="2" | 0.859
| 100.15609286293080185146114418622
|-
| style="text-align: center" | [[16/11]]
| 118
| 117.84390713706919814853885581378
|-
| style="text-align: center" | [[11/10]]
| 30
| rowspan="2" | 2
| rowspan="2" | 0.133
| 29.975768177485810015731508557536
|-
| style="text-align: center" | [[20/11]]
| 188
| 188.02423182251418998426849144246
|-
| style="text-align: center" | [[17/16]]
| 19
| rowspan="2" | 7
| rowspan="2" | 0.368
| 19.066899392573990999386390356668
|-
| style="text-align: center" | [[32/17]]
| 199
| 198.93310060742600900061360964333
|}

Hopefully, the sort function dosn't get confused by combined cells.

What do you think about tables like this? --[[User:Xenwolf|Xenwolf]] ([[User talk:Xenwolf|talk]]) 09:52, 2 October 2018 (UTC)