Talk:1352/1331 - Revision history

BudjarnLambeth at 12:33, 25 April 2025

2025-04-25T12:33:56Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:33, 25 April 2025
Line 10:		Line 10:

	: Since the todo issue had not been resolved,I needed this page to still be in some kind of todo category. But it was silly to have it in a category all its own. Hence me moving it to the "discuss title" category by using that mbox.		: Since the todo issue had not been resolved,I needed this page to still be in some kind of todo category. But it was silly to have it in a category all its own. Hence me moving it to the "discuss title" category by using that mbox.

			: I'm happy to replace the mbox with a regular talk page post though if you like, I'm okay either way.

	: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 11:06, 25 April 2025 (UTC)		: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 11:06, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

BudjarnLambeth: Replied

2025-04-25T11:06:07Z

Replied

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:06, 25 April 2025
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Also, archaeotonic and oneirotonic are both Lovecraft references, so I don't think people really make a big deal out of this.		Also, archaeotonic and oneirotonic are both Lovecraft references, so I don't think people really make a big deal out of this.
	– [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 10:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)		– [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 10:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

			: The original purpose of the "controversial names" category was to act like a todo category. I wasn't actually the first to complain about this comma, others had complained about it on Discord, so I lumped it in with the others in that category.

			: But since then, every other page in that category has either been renamed, or deemed not controversial abd removed, leaving this page alone in the category.

			: Since the todo issue had not been resolved,I needed this page to still be in some kind of todo category. But it was silly to have it in a category all its own. Hence me moving it to the "discuss title" category by using that mbox.

			: --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 11:06, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Sintel at 10:38, 25 April 2025

2025-04-25T10:38:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:38, 25 April 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{todo\|inline=1\|discuss title\|text=Is Lovecraft too divisive a figure for a comma and temperament to be named after, given his hard-line racist views even for the time?}}		{{todo\|inline=1\|discuss title\|text=Is Lovecraft too divisive a figure for a comma and temperament to be named after, given his hard-line racist views even for the time?}}

			Why post your comment as a todo template instead of using the talk page like usual?
			Also, archaeotonic and oneirotonic are both Lovecraft references, so I don't think people really make a big deal out of this.
			– [[User:Sintel\|Sintel🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 10:38, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

BudjarnLambeth: Created page with "{{todo|inline=1|discuss title|text=Is Lovecraft too divisive a figure for a comma and temperament to be named after, given his hard-line racist views even for the time?}}"

2025-04-25T01:04:05Z

Created page with "{{todo|inline=1|discuss title|text=Is Lovecraft too divisive a figure for a comma and temperament to be named after, given his hard-line racist views even for the time?}}"

New page

{{todo|inline=1|discuss title|text=Is Lovecraft too divisive a figure for a comma and temperament to be named after, given his hard-line racist views even for the time?}}