Talk:11edo - Revision history

Sintel: typo

2025-02-13T22:55:35Z

typo

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:55, 13 February 2025
Line 6:		Line 6:
	"The wiki page for 11EDO might need brushing up in regards to consistency, since it keeps referring to the "correct" 9-limit intervals, but the listed val in 3-limit cannot produce those 🤔 Because the 3rd harmonic is so flat, it would put 9/8 at 1\11 edosteps, but the page keeps referring it to 2\11."		"The wiki page for 11EDO might need brushing up in regards to consistency, since it keeps referring to the "correct" 9-limit intervals, but the listed val in 3-limit cannot produce those 🤔 Because the 3rd harmonic is so flat, it would put 9/8 at 1\11 edosteps, but the page keeps referring it to 2\11."

	: I don't really see the issue. Mapping 9/8 to 1/11 seems absurd, and the interval table does state that it's based on the 2.9 subgroup and not 2.3.		: I don't really see the issue. Mapping 9/8 to 1\11 seems absurd, and the interval table does state that it's based on the 2.9 subgroup and not 2.3.
	: Maybe the confusion is because in the regular temperament properties the full 13-limit [11 17 26 31 38 41] is assumed (which is questionable for sure).		: Maybe the confusion is because in the regular temperament properties the full 13-limit [11 17 26 31 38 41] is assumed (which is questionable for sure).
	: – [[User:Sintel\|<span style="color:#965d99">Sintel</span>🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 22:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)		: – [[User:Sintel\|<span style="color:#965d99">Sintel</span>🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 22:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

Sintel at 22:55, 13 February 2025

2025-02-13T22:55:22Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:55, 13 February 2025
Line 5:		Line 5:

	"The wiki page for 11EDO might need brushing up in regards to consistency, since it keeps referring to the "correct" 9-limit intervals, but the listed val in 3-limit cannot produce those 🤔 Because the 3rd harmonic is so flat, it would put 9/8 at 1\11 edosteps, but the page keeps referring it to 2\11."		"The wiki page for 11EDO might need brushing up in regards to consistency, since it keeps referring to the "correct" 9-limit intervals, but the listed val in 3-limit cannot produce those 🤔 Because the 3rd harmonic is so flat, it would put 9/8 at 1\11 edosteps, but the page keeps referring it to 2\11."

			: I don't really see the issue. Mapping 9/8 to 1/11 seems absurd, and the interval table does state that it's based on the 2.9 subgroup and not 2.3.
			: Maybe the confusion is because in the regular temperament properties the full 13-limit [11 17 26 31 38 41] is assumed (which is questionable for sure).
			: – [[User:Sintel\|<span style="color:#965d99">Sintel</span>🎏]] ([[User_talk:Sintel\|talk]]) 22:55, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

BudjarnLambeth: Please check mapping of 9-limit intervals

2025-02-13T09:26:37Z

Please check mapping of 9-limit intervals

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:26, 13 February 2025
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{WSArchiveLink}}		{{WSArchiveLink}}

			== Please check mapping of 9-limit intervals ==
			Someone private messaged me on Facebook because I'm a wiki editor, but I didn't feel confident dealing with the thing they talked about so I'm posting it here so someone more confident and experienced can deal with it:

			"The wiki page for 11EDO might need brushing up in regards to consistency, since it keeps referring to the "correct" 9-limit intervals, but the listed val in 3-limit cannot produce those 🤔 Because the 3rd harmonic is so flat, it would put 9/8 at 1\11 edosteps, but the page keeps referring it to 2\11."

Mike Battaglia: 1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage

2018-10-01T18:02:30Z

1 revision imported: Moving archived Wikispaces discussion to subpage

← Older revision	Revision as of 18:02, 1 October 2018
(No difference)

WikispacesArchive>Mike Battaglia: Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' ''...

2018-10-01T18:01:16Z

Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' <span style="color:#800000">''...

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:01, 1 October 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	~~= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =~~		{{WSArchiveLink}}
	~~'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''~~

	~~<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.~~

	~~----~~

	~~== A modest suggerence for 11-EDD notation ==~~
	~~Is possible that i put a notation based on the MOSscale 222221, like this:~~

	~~Cent-Name-Step~~

	~~0 - Q - 0~~

	~~109 - Q# - 1~~

	~~218 - R - 2~~

	~~327 - R# - 3~~

	~~436 - S - 4~~

	~~545 - S# - 5~~

	~~655 - T - 6~~

	~~764 - T# - 7~~

	~~873 - U - 8~~

	~~982 - U# - 9~~

	~~1091 - P\Qb - 10~~

	~~1200 - Q\P# - 11\0~~

	~~The letters are P, Q, R, S, T and U.~~

	~~Greetings \\\'\\\\'~~

	~~- '''Osmiorisbendi''' November 19, 2011, 09:25:31 PM UTC-0800~~
	~~----~~
	~~Sure, that's based around machine[6]. Although I'd suggest the 221222 mode as base, though...~~

	~~- '''mbattaglia1''' November 19, 2011, 09:56:02 PM UTC-0800~~
	~~----~~
	~~Thanks, Mike. So, the MOSscale 5L1s is called Machine?~~

	~~Ok (;~~

	~~- '''Osmiorisbendi''' November 20, 2011, 09:08:03 PM UTC-0800~~
	~~----~~

	~~== Dan Stearns? ==~~
	~~Works by Dan Stearns have been repeatedly inserted and deleted again. Why that?~~

	~~- '''hstraub''' April 08, 2008, 01:30:03 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~Who did the deleting?~~

	~~- '''genewardsmith''' March 28, 2011, 10:47:17 PM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~The deleting was always done by a guest. But it seems that the link target istn't available any more.~~

	~~- '''xenwolf''' March 28, 2011, 11:56:28 PM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~here I googled some infos, (links also broken)~~

	~~http://www.musik-news.org/post/12124/thinking_outside_the_box...and_the_circle_of_fifths.html~~

	~~but look here :)~~

	~~http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/dan-stearns/individual-files-20100308/~~

	~~- '''xenwolf''' March 29, 2011, 12:02:23 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~I think it was Dan Stearns himself who deleted them.~~

	~~- '''hstraub''' March 29, 2011, 12:03:03 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	~~Do you know him? Doesn't he want to be listed here?~~

	~~- '''xenwolf''' March 29, 2011, 12:16:33 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~
	I remember some e-mails I exchanged with someone who had deleted links to his music on the xenwiki, and he explicitly said he did not wanted the links. But I do not remember whether it was Dan Stearns. I will check tonight at home.

	~~- '''hstraub''' March 29, 2011, 05:11:13 AM UTC-0700~~
	~~----~~

Mike Battaglia: Text replacement - "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''" to "'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.''' ''...

2018-09-20T07:00:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 20 September 2018
Line 1:		Line 1:
	= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =		= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
	'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''		'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''

			<span style="color:#800000">'''PLEASE MAKE ANY NEW COMMENTS <u>ABOVE</u> THIS SECTION.'''</span> Anything below here is for archival purposes only.

	----		----

Wikispaces>FREEZE at 00:00, 17 July 2018

2018-07-17T00:00:00Z

New page

= ARCHIVED WIKISPACES DISCUSSION BELOW =
'''All discussion below is archived from the Wikispaces export in its original unaltered form.'''
----

== A modest suggerence for 11-EDD notation ==
Is possible that i put a notation based on the MOSscale 222221, like this:

Cent-Name-Step

0 - Q - 0

109 - Q# - 1

218 - R - 2

327 - R# - 3

436 - S - 4

545 - S# - 5

655 - T - 6

764 - T# - 7

873 - U - 8

982 - U# - 9

1091 - P\Qb - 10

1200 - Q\P# - 11\0

The letters are P, Q, R, S, T and U.

Greetings \\\'\\\\'

- '''Osmiorisbendi''' November 19, 2011, 09:25:31 PM UTC-0800
----
Sure, that's based around machine[6]. Although I'd suggest the 221222 mode as base, though...

- '''mbattaglia1''' November 19, 2011, 09:56:02 PM UTC-0800
----
Thanks, Mike. So, the MOSscale 5L1s is called Machine?

Ok (;

- '''Osmiorisbendi''' November 20, 2011, 09:08:03 PM UTC-0800
----

== Dan Stearns? ==
Works by Dan Stearns have been repeatedly inserted and deleted again. Why that?

- '''hstraub''' April 08, 2008, 01:30:03 AM UTC-0700
----
Who did the deleting?

- '''genewardsmith''' March 28, 2011, 10:47:17 PM UTC-0700
----
The deleting was always done by a guest. But it seems that the link target istn't available any more.

- '''xenwolf''' March 28, 2011, 11:56:28 PM UTC-0700
----
here I googled some infos, (links also broken)

http://www.musik-news.org/post/12124/thinking_outside_the_box...and_the_circle_of_fifths.html

but look *here* :)

http://clones.soonlabel.com/public/micro/dan-stearns/individual-files-20100308/

- '''xenwolf''' March 29, 2011, 12:02:23 AM UTC-0700
----
I think it was Dan Stearns himself who deleted them.

- '''hstraub''' March 29, 2011, 12:03:03 AM UTC-0700
----
Do you know him? Doesn't he want to be listed here?

- '''xenwolf''' March 29, 2011, 12:16:33 AM UTC-0700
----
I remember some e-mails I exchanged with someone who had deleted links to his music on the xenwiki, and he explicitly said he did not wanted the links. But I do not remember whether it was Dan Stearns. I will check tonight at home.

- '''hstraub''' March 29, 2011, 05:11:13 AM UTC-0700
----