Damage - Revision history

ArrowHead294: Update links

2024-11-02T17:57:17Z

Update links

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:57, 2 November 2024
Line 2:		Line 2:

	== History ==		== History ==
			The use of the term "damage" in the modern sense was popularized by Paul Erlich through his paper [[A Middle Path]], published in August of 2004. Leading up to the publication of this paper, Erlich had begun using it on the [[Yahoo Groups tuning lists]], where it had already started to gain some traction with other members of the community.<ref group="note">
	The use of the term "damage" in the modern sense was popularized by Paul Erlich through his paper [[A Middle Path]], published in August of 2004. Leading up to the publication of this paper, Erlich had begun using it on the [[Yahoo Groups tuning lists]], where it had already started to gain some traction with other members of the community.<ref>
	See:		See:
	* https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning-math/topicId_1449#1449		* https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning-math/topicId_1449#1449
Line 11:		Line 10:
	</ref>		</ref>

	In Middle Path, Erlich used the word "damage" to refer to the absolute value of error<ref>Erlich referred to error as "mistuning" in this paper.</ref> weighted by [[harmonic distance]]. As the term damage grew in popularity and began to be generalized to be weighted by other complexities (such as TE), the original measurement eventually came to assume the more specific and technical name of "TOP damage". The "TOP" part of the name is due to the fact that when Erlich first described it, he described it in the context [[TOP tuning]], a tuning which is designed to minimize this particular type of damage. This sets a historical precedent, then, that other types of damage may be named either after a tuning that minimizes it, or the complexity used as a weight in its calculation (sometimes these are the same thing).		In Middle Path, Erlich used the word "damage" to refer to the absolute value of error<ref group="note">Erlich referred to error as "mistuning" in this paper.</ref> weighted by [[harmonic distance]]. As the term damage grew in popularity and began to be generalized to be weighted by other complexities (such as TE), the original measurement eventually came to assume the more specific and technical name of "TOP damage". The "TOP" part of the name is due to the fact that when Erlich first described it, he described it in the context [[TOP tuning]], a tuning which is designed to minimize this particular type of damage. This sets a historical precedent, then, that other types of damage may be named either after a tuning that minimizes it, or the complexity used as a weight in its calculation (sometimes these are the same thing).

	== See also ==		== See also ==
			* [[Dave Keenan & Douglas Blumeyer's guide to RTT/Tuning fundamentals#Damage]]: for a step-by-step textbook tutorial style introduction to this topic

	* [[Dave Keenan & Douglas Blumeyer's guide to RTT: tuning fundamentals#Damage]]: for a step-by-step textbook tutorial style introduction to this topic		== Notes ==
			<references group="note" />

	~~== Notes ==~~
	[[Category:Error]]		[[Category:Error]]
	[[Category:Terms]]		[[Category:Terms]]

Fredg999 category edits: Categories

2023-03-11T05:58:17Z

Fredg999 category edits: Moving from Category:Tuning to Category:Error using Cat-a-lot

2023-02-26T06:28:47Z

Moving from Category:Tuning to Category:Error using Cat-a-lot

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:28, 26 February 2023
Line 20:		Line 20:
	[[Category:Regular temperament theory]]		[[Category:Regular temperament theory]]
	[[Category:Terms]]		[[Category:Terms]]
	[[Category:~~Tuning~~]]		[[Category:Error]]

Cmloegcmluin: add link to D&D guide

2022-12-14T23:05:26Z

add link to D&D guide

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:05, 14 December 2022
Line 12:		Line 12:

	In Middle Path, Erlich used the word "damage" to refer to the absolute value of error<ref>Erlich referred to error as "mistuning" in this paper.</ref> weighted by [[harmonic distance]]. As the term damage grew in popularity and began to be generalized to be weighted by other complexities (such as TE), the original measurement eventually came to assume the more specific and technical name of "TOP damage". The "TOP" part of the name is due to the fact that when Erlich first described it, he described it in the context [[TOP tuning]], a tuning which is designed to minimize this particular type of damage. This sets a historical precedent, then, that other types of damage may be named either after a tuning that minimizes it, or the complexity used as a weight in its calculation (sometimes these are the same thing).		In Middle Path, Erlich used the word "damage" to refer to the absolute value of error<ref>Erlich referred to error as "mistuning" in this paper.</ref> weighted by [[harmonic distance]]. As the term damage grew in popularity and began to be generalized to be weighted by other complexities (such as TE), the original measurement eventually came to assume the more specific and technical name of "TOP damage". The "TOP" part of the name is due to the fact that when Erlich first described it, he described it in the context [[TOP tuning]], a tuning which is designed to minimize this particular type of damage. This sets a historical precedent, then, that other types of damage may be named either after a tuning that minimizes it, or the complexity used as a weight in its calculation (sometimes these are the same thing).

			== See also ==

			* [[Dave Keenan & Douglas Blumeyer's guide to RTT: tuning fundamentals#Damage]]: for a step-by-step textbook tutorial style introduction to this topic

	== Notes ==		== Notes ==

FloraC: Style

2022-03-06T00:30:55Z

Style

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:30, 6 March 2022
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Damage''' is a measurement of how much an interval deviates from another interval it is approximating. In the simplest case it is the absolute value of [[error]], and variations are defined where the error is also weighted, typically by a [[complexity]] measure.		'''Damage''' is a measurement of how much an interval deviates from another interval it is approximating. In the simplest case it is the absolute value of [[error]], and variations are defined where the error is also weighted, typically by a [[complexity]] measure.

	= History =		== History ==

	The use of the term "damage" in the modern sense was popularized by Paul Erlich through his paper [[A Middle Path]], published in August of 2004. Leading up to the publication of this paper, Erlich had begun using it on the [[Yahoo Groups tuning lists]], where it had already started to gain some traction with other members of the community.<ref>		The use of the term "damage" in the modern sense was popularized by Paul Erlich through his paper [[A Middle Path]], published in August of 2004. Leading up to the publication of this paper, Erlich had begun using it on the [[Yahoo Groups tuning lists]], where it had already started to gain some traction with other members of the community.<ref>
	See:		See:
	https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning-math/topicId_1449#1449		* https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning-math/topicId_1449#1449
	https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/makemicromusic/topicId_2109#2109		* https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/makemicromusic/topicId_2109#2109
	https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_35583#36052		* https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_35583#36052
	https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_53712#53849		* https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_53712#53849
	</ref>		</ref>

	In Middle Path, Erlich used the word "damage" to refer to the absolute value of error<ref>Erlich referred to error as "mistuning" in this paper.</ref> weighted by [[harmonic distance]]. As the term damage grew in popularity and began to be generalized to be weighted by other complexities (such as TE), the original measurement eventually came to assume the more specific and technical name of "TOP damage". The "TOP" part of the name is due to the fact that when Erlich first described it, he described it in the context [[TOP tuning]], a tuning which is designed to minimize this particular type of damage. This sets a historical precedent, then, that other types of damage may be named either after a tuning that minimizes it, or the complexity used as a weight in its calculation (sometimes these are the same thing).		In Middle Path, Erlich used the word "damage" to refer to the absolute value of error<ref>Erlich referred to error as "mistuning" in this paper.</ref> weighted by [[harmonic distance]]. As the term damage grew in popularity and began to be generalized to be weighted by other complexities (such as TE), the original measurement eventually came to assume the more specific and technical name of "TOP damage". The "TOP" part of the name is due to the fact that when Erlich first described it, he described it in the context [[TOP tuning]], a tuning which is designed to minimize this particular type of damage. This sets a historical precedent, then, that other types of damage may be named either after a tuning that minimizes it, or the complexity used as a weight in its calculation (sometimes these are the same thing).

			== Notes ==
	[[Category:Regular temperament theory]]		[[Category:Regular temperament theory]]
	[[Category:Terms]]		[[Category:Terms]]
	[[Category:Tuning]]		[[Category:Tuning]]

Cmloegcmluin: Created page with "'''Damage''' is a measurement of how much an interval deviates from another interval it is approximating. In the simplest case it is the absolute value of error, and varia..."

2022-03-06T00:15:44Z

Created page with "'''Damage''' is a measurement of how much an interval deviates from another interval it is approximating. In the simplest case it is the absolute value of error, and varia..."

New page

'''Damage''' is a measurement of how much an interval deviates from another interval it is approximating. In the simplest case it is the absolute value of [[error]], and variations are defined where the error is also weighted, typically by a [[complexity]] measure.

= History =

The use of the term "damage" in the modern sense was popularized by Paul Erlich through his paper [[A Middle Path]], published in August of 2004. Leading up to the publication of this paper, Erlich had begun using it on the [[Yahoo Groups tuning lists]], where it had already started to gain some traction with other members of the community.<ref>
See:
https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning-math/topicId_1449#1449
https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/makemicromusic/topicId_2109#2109
https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_35583#36052
https://yahootuninggroupsultimatebackup.github.io/tuning/topicId_53712#53849
</ref>

In Middle Path, Erlich used the word "damage" to refer to the absolute value of error<ref>Erlich referred to error as "mistuning" in this paper.</ref> weighted by [[harmonic distance]]. As the term damage grew in popularity and began to be generalized to be weighted by other complexities (such as TE), the original measurement eventually came to assume the more specific and technical name of "TOP damage". The "TOP" part of the name is due to the fact that when Erlich first described it, he described it in the context [[TOP tuning]], a tuning which is designed to minimize this particular type of damage. This sets a historical precedent, then, that other types of damage may be named either after a tuning that minimizes it, or the complexity used as a weight in its calculation (sometimes these are the same thing).

[[Category:Regular temperament theory]]
[[Category:Terms]]
[[Category:Tuning]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:58, 11 March 2023
Line 18:		Line 18:

	== Notes ==		== Notes ==
	[[Category:~~Regular temperament theory~~]]		[[Category:Error]]
	[[Category:Terms]]		[[Category:Terms]]
	~~[[Category:Error]]~~