Category talk:Equivalence interval - Revision history

BudjarnLambeth: Said thanks for the help

2023-07-06T03:06:26Z

Said thanks for the help

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:06, 6 July 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove the category from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove the category from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
	:::: I can handle it with my category edits accounts, it'll be faster using Cat-a-lot. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		:::: I can handle it with my category edits accounts, it'll be faster using Cat-a-lot. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
	::::: Awesome, thank you for doing that :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		::::: Awesome, thank you for doing that Fredg999 :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

BudjarnLambeth: /* What should be in this category? */

2023-07-06T02:57:47Z

What should be in this category?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:57, 6 July 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove the category from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove the category from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
	:::: I can handle it with my category edits accounts, it'll be faster using Cat-a-lot. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		:::: I can handle it with my category edits accounts, it'll be faster using Cat-a-lot. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
			::::: Awesome, thank you for doing that :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Fredg999: /* What should be in this category? */ re

2023-07-06T02:56:01Z

What should be in this category?: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:56, 6 July 2023
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:: To be honest, I don't think this category is even necessary or relevant anyway; of course the page about [[equave]]s is needed, and relevant pages can link to each other, but having a category for that seems unjustified, especially since the boundaries for that category will most likely remain fuzzy forever. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		:: To be honest, I don't think this category is even necessary or relevant anyway; of course the page about [[equave]]s is needed, and relevant pages can link to each other, but having a category for that seems unjustified, especially since the boundaries for that category will most likely remain fuzzy forever. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
	::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove the category from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove the category from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
			:::: I can handle it with my category edits accounts, it'll be faster using Cat-a-lot. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

BudjarnLambeth: Replied

2023-07-06T02:55:19Z

Replied

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:55, 6 July 2023
Line 6:		Line 6:
	: I was wondering the same. While I've seen many scales with diverse ''intervals of repetition'', including equal divisions of various just intervals, I have seen very little accounts of people stating they actually hear anything else than octaves, and possibly tritaves (although even a stack of two tritaves is a stretch in my opinion). Scales like [[10ed5]] and [[19ed11]] may well feature a just interval different from the octave, that doesn't promote it automatically to the rank of "equivalence interval".		: I was wondering the same. While I've seen many scales with diverse ''intervals of repetition'', including equal divisions of various just intervals, I have seen very little accounts of people stating they actually hear anything else than octaves, and possibly tritaves (although even a stack of two tritaves is a stretch in my opinion). Scales like [[10ed5]] and [[19ed11]] may well feature a just interval different from the octave, that doesn't promote it automatically to the rank of "equivalence interval".
	:: To be honest, I don't think this category is even necessary or relevant anyway; of course the page about [[equave]]s is needed, and relevant pages can link to each other, but having a category for that seems unjustified, especially since the boundaries for that category will most likely remain fuzzy forever. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		:: To be honest, I don't think this category is even necessary or relevant anyway; of course the page about [[equave]]s is needed, and relevant pages can link to each other, but having a category for that seems unjustified, especially since the boundaries for that category will most likely remain fuzzy forever. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
	::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove it from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove the category from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

BudjarnLambeth: /* What should be in this category? */

2023-07-06T02:52:20Z

What should be in this category?

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 6 July 2023
Line 5:		Line 5:
	: I’m happy to go with whatever the consensus is, though, because I don’t really have a strong opinion on what counts as an “equivalence interval” and what doesn’t. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		: I’m happy to go with whatever the consensus is, though, because I don’t really have a strong opinion on what counts as an “equivalence interval” and what doesn’t. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
	: I was wondering the same. While I've seen many scales with diverse ''intervals of repetition'', including equal divisions of various just intervals, I have seen very little accounts of people stating they actually hear anything else than octaves, and possibly tritaves (although even a stack of two tritaves is a stretch in my opinion). Scales like [[10ed5]] and [[19ed11]] may well feature a just interval different from the octave, that doesn't promote it automatically to the rank of "equivalence interval".		: I was wondering the same. While I've seen many scales with diverse ''intervals of repetition'', including equal divisions of various just intervals, I have seen very little accounts of people stating they actually hear anything else than octaves, and possibly tritaves (although even a stack of two tritaves is a stretch in my opinion). Scales like [[10ed5]] and [[19ed11]] may well feature a just interval different from the octave, that doesn't promote it automatically to the rank of "equivalence interval".
	: To be honest, I don't think this category is even necessary or relevant anyway; of course the page about [[equave]]s is needed, and relevant pages can link to each other, but having a category for that seems unjustified, especially since the boundaries for that category will most likely remain fuzzy forever. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		:: To be honest, I don't think this category is even necessary or relevant anyway; of course the page about [[equave]]s is needed, and relevant pages can link to each other, but having a category for that seems unjustified, especially since the boundaries for that category will most likely remain fuzzy forever. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
			::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove it from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Fredg999: /* What should be in this category? */ re

2023-07-06T02:47:24Z

What should be in this category?: re

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:47, 6 July 2023
Line 4:		Line 4:
	: I know there is a debate about whether tritave-equivalence, pentave-equivalence, etc. actually exist. Personally, I can’t hear tritave equivalence. I can only hear octave, 4ve, and 8ve equivalence. But even though I can’t hear it, it’s a fact that people have made music using tritave, pentave, etc. equivalence as a theoretical framework. So if people have made music using this idea, I think it should still count, even if I personally can’t hear it.		: I know there is a debate about whether tritave-equivalence, pentave-equivalence, etc. actually exist. Personally, I can’t hear tritave equivalence. I can only hear octave, 4ve, and 8ve equivalence. But even though I can’t hear it, it’s a fact that people have made music using tritave, pentave, etc. equivalence as a theoretical framework. So if people have made music using this idea, I think it should still count, even if I personally can’t hear it.
	: I’m happy to go with whatever the consensus is, though, because I don’t really have a strong opinion on what counts as an “equivalence interval” and what doesn’t. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		: I’m happy to go with whatever the consensus is, though, because I don’t really have a strong opinion on what counts as an “equivalence interval” and what doesn’t. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
			: I was wondering the same. While I've seen many scales with diverse ''intervals of repetition'', including equal divisions of various just intervals, I have seen very little accounts of people stating they actually hear anything else than octaves, and possibly tritaves (although even a stack of two tritaves is a stretch in my opinion). Scales like [[10ed5]] and [[19ed11]] may well feature a just interval different from the octave, that doesn't promote it automatically to the rank of "equivalence interval".
			: To be honest, I don't think this category is even necessary or relevant anyway; of course the page about [[equave]]s is needed, and relevant pages can link to each other, but having a category for that seems unjustified, especially since the boundaries for that category will most likely remain fuzzy forever. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

BudjarnLambeth at 02:40, 6 July 2023

2023-07-06T02:40:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:40, 6 July 2023
Line 3:		Line 3:
	: My personal opinion is that any harmonic e.g. 2/1, 3/1 that is listed on the “equal-step tunings” page should count as an equivalence interval.		: My personal opinion is that any harmonic e.g. 2/1, 3/1 that is listed on the “equal-step tunings” page should count as an equivalence interval.
	: I know there is a debate about whether tritave-equivalence, pentave-equivalence, etc. actually exist. Personally, I can’t hear tritave equivalence. I can only hear octave, 4ve, and 8ve equivalence. But even though I can’t hear it, it’s a fact that people have made music using tritave, pentave, etc. equivalence as a theoretical framework. So if people have made music using this idea, I think it should still count, even if I personally can’t hear it.		: I know there is a debate about whether tritave-equivalence, pentave-equivalence, etc. actually exist. Personally, I can’t hear tritave equivalence. I can only hear octave, 4ve, and 8ve equivalence. But even though I can’t hear it, it’s a fact that people have made music using tritave, pentave, etc. equivalence as a theoretical framework. So if people have made music using this idea, I think it should still count, even if I personally can’t hear it.
	I’m happy to go with whatever the consensus is, though, because I don’t really have a strong opinion on what counts as an “equivalence interval” and what doesn’t. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		: I’m happy to go with whatever the consensus is, though, because I don’t really have a strong opinion on what counts as an “equivalence interval” and what doesn’t. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

BudjarnLambeth: Replied

2023-07-06T02:40:33Z

Replied

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:40, 6 July 2023
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== What should be in this category? ==		== What should be in this category? ==
	What counts as an equivalence interval and what doesn't? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 02:32, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		What counts as an equivalence interval and what doesn't? [[User:FloraC\|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC\|talk]]) 02:32, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
			: My personal opinion is that any harmonic e.g. 2/1, 3/1 that is listed on the “equal-step tunings” page should count as an equivalence interval.
			: I know there is a debate about whether tritave-equivalence, pentave-equivalence, etc. actually exist. Personally, I can’t hear tritave equivalence. I can only hear octave, 4ve, and 8ve equivalence. But even though I can’t hear it, it’s a fact that people have made music using tritave, pentave, etc. equivalence as a theoretical framework. So if people have made music using this idea, I think it should still count, even if I personally can’t hear it.
			I’m happy to go with whatever the consensus is, though, because I don’t really have a strong opinion on what counts as an “equivalence interval” and what doesn’t. --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:40, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

FloraC: Created page with "== What should be in this category? == What counts as an equivalence interval and what doesn't? ~~~~"

2023-07-06T02:32:45Z

Created page with "== What should be in this category? == What counts as an equivalence interval and what doesn't? ~~~~"

New page

== What should be in this category? ==
What counts as an equivalence interval and what doesn't? [[User:FloraC|FloraC]] ([[User talk:FloraC|talk]]) 02:32, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:06, 6 July 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove the category from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove the category from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
	:::: I can handle it with my category edits accounts, it'll be faster using Cat-a-lot. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		:::: I can handle it with my category edits accounts, it'll be faster using Cat-a-lot. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
	::::: Awesome, thank you for doing that :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		::::: Awesome, thank you for doing that Fredg999 :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:57, 6 July 2023
Line 8:		Line 8:
	::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove the category from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove the category from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
	:::: I can handle it with my category edits accounts, it'll be faster using Cat-a-lot. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		:::: I can handle it with my category edits accounts, it'll be faster using Cat-a-lot. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
			::::: Awesome, thank you for doing that :) --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:57, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:56, 6 July 2023
Line 7:		Line 7:
	:: To be honest, I don't think this category is even necessary or relevant anyway; of course the page about [[equave]]s is needed, and relevant pages can link to each other, but having a category for that seems unjustified, especially since the boundaries for that category will most likely remain fuzzy forever. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		:: To be honest, I don't think this category is even necessary or relevant anyway; of course the page about [[equave]]s is needed, and relevant pages can link to each other, but having a category for that seems unjustified, especially since the boundaries for that category will most likely remain fuzzy forever. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:47, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
	::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove the category from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)		::: I’m happy for the category to be deleted. Should I go ahead and remove the category from the pages I added it to? --[[User:BudjarnLambeth\|BudjarnLambeth]] ([[User talk:BudjarnLambeth\|talk]]) 02:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
			:::: I can handle it with my category edits accounts, it'll be faster using Cat-a-lot. --[[User:Fredg999\|Fredg999]] ([[User talk:Fredg999\|talk]]) 02:56, 6 July 2023 (UTC)