{"batchcomplete":"","continue":{"lecontinue":"20260819145950|49147","continue":"-||"},"query":{"logevents":[{"logid":49157,"ns":0,"title":"4L 4s (3/1-equivalent)","pageid":26319,"logpage":26319,"revid":236152,"params":{},"type":"create","action":"create","user":"BudjarnLambeth","timestamp":"2026-08-22T11:32:15Z","comment":"Created page with \"{{Infobox MOS}} {{MOS intro}}   This is a relatively unexplored MOS. All its neighbouring MOS sizes have seen some degree of exploration, but 4L 4s<3/1> hasn't yet.   Its scale shape is highly reminiscent of the familiar diminished scale from octave-bssed music theory ([[4L 4s]]).  In addition to the true mos form, LsLsLsLs, there are four near-mos forms \u2013 LLsLsLss, LLsLssLs, LLssLLss, and LLssLsLs \u2013 in which the period and its multiples are the only intervals with m...\""},{"logid":49156,"ns":0,"title":"1-3-7-17 stellated hexany","pageid":26318,"logpage":26318,"revid":236139,"params":{},"type":"create","action":"create","user":"Yourmusic Productions","timestamp":"2026-08-22T10:18:05Z","comment":"Create Page."},{"logid":49155,"ns":6,"title":"File:1-3-7-17 stellated hexany.png","pageid":26317,"logpage":26317,"revid":236138,"params":{},"type":"create","action":"create","user":"Yourmusic Productions","timestamp":"2026-08-22T09:33:20Z","comment":"Made with [https://nickvuci.github.io/ScaleCircle ''ScaleCircle''] by [[Nick Vuci]]."},{"logid":49154,"ns":6,"title":"File:1-3-7-17 stellated hexany.png","pageid":26317,"logpage":26317,"revid":236138,"params":{"img_sha1":"3xlwifveblav5pgxv8v3y2ygin6svn5","img_timestamp":"2026-08-22T09:33:20Z"},"type":"upload","action":"upload","user":"Yourmusic Productions","timestamp":"2026-08-22T09:33:20Z","comment":"Made with [https://nickvuci.github.io/ScaleCircle ''ScaleCircle''] by [[Nick Vuci]]."},{"logid":49153,"ns":2,"title":"User:Retroboy87","pageid":0,"logpage":0,"params":{"userid":664},"type":"newusers","action":"byemail","user":"FloraC","timestamp":"2026-08-22T02:26:15Z","comment":""},{"logid":49152,"ns":2,"title":"User:PaoloZ","pageid":0,"logpage":0,"params":{"userid":663},"type":"newusers","action":"byemail","user":"FloraC","timestamp":"2026-08-22T02:25:43Z","comment":""},{"logid":49151,"ns":2,"title":"User:Eliora/Leaves","pageid":26316,"logpage":26316,"revid":236090,"params":{},"type":"create","action":"create","user":"FloraC","timestamp":"2026-08-20T09:25:36Z","comment":"As requested, deleted temp entries will be moved to the user page"},{"logid":49150,"ns":0,"title":"Counterpara","pageid":26315,"logpage":26315,"revid":236082,"params":{},"type":"create","action":"create","user":"FloraC","timestamp":"2026-08-20T08:54:48Z","comment":"Redirected page to [[Parakleismic family#Counterpara]]"},{"logid":49149,"ns":1,"title":"Talk:Sensipent family","pageid":26314,"logpage":26314,"revid":236068,"params":{},"type":"create","action":"create","user":"Godtone","timestamp":"2026-08-19T23:19:07Z","comment":"Created page with \"== Is 2.3.5.31 sensipent not accurate enough to be canonical? == I ask because the optimal ET sequence starts 8, 11c, 19, 46, 65 for both but 5-limit sensipent finishes with 539, 604c, 669c while 2.3.5.31 finishes with 344, 409, 474, 539, 604c, so both reach the constrained range implied by 539 and 604c. Also, it looked prettier and presented interesting information up-front in its previous form. Take a look at [https://en.xen.wiki/index.php?title=Sensipent_family&diff=2...\""},{"logid":49148,"ns":0,"title":"1-3-7-17 hexany","pageid":26313,"logpage":26313,"revid":236066,"params":{},"type":"create","action":"create","user":"Yourmusic Productions","timestamp":"2026-08-19T17:42:28Z","comment":"Create Page."}]}}